Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas Likely to Have Price Fixed

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Likely to Have Price Fixed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Aug 2007, 11:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas Likely to Have Price Fixed

By Mark Schliebs (News.com)

August 02, 2007 09:32pm
QANTAS may be facing massive penalties after admitting it was "likely" it had engaged in price-fixing of the type that saw British Airways fined a total of $643.96m for anti-competitive behaviour last night.

During the trans-Atlantic investigation into the collusion between BA, Korean Air Lines, Virgin Atlantic and Lufthansa to set prices, Qantas management handed over documents to the US Department of Justice (DoJ), which showed possible breaches of competition law.

In a later company document from the failed takeover bid by Air Partners Australia dated February 2007 and seen by NEWS.com.au, Qantas admitted the DoJ investigation had found likely breaches in non-passenger services.

"During this investigation Qantas learned that the practice adopted by Qantas Freight and the cargo industry generally, to fix and impose cargo fuel surcharges is likely to have breached relevant competition laws," the document said.

"Qantas has been co-operating fully with all regulators and will continue to provide information to assist with their investigations."

Previous to this Qantas had only admitted that there "may" have been breaches.

Qantas management has categorically denied involvement in price-fixing on passenger services.

In February of this year court cases were launched in the US and Australia alleging anti-competitive Qantas behaviour in the freight and cargo sector.

The sums being extracted from British Airlines in the US and Britain would give the national carrier reason to worry.

Qantas has refused to be drawn on the matter of damages except that it "expects that it will take at least 12 months before it is possible to quantify any direct or indirect liability associated with these matters."
Z Force is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2007, 13:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all pacific routes maybe?

i thinks its a bit hypocritical of the USA to fine BA, as almost all US airlines are propped up with taxpayer funds..
would be nice though to see BA put a fine surcharge on all tickets from the USA.
Ultralights is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2007, 00:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Keeping The Enema Bandit in line
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I wonder how young aircraft will defend these alledged management indiscretions??
Enema Bandit's Dad is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2007, 00:44
  #4 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Enema Bandit's Dad,

That is an eay one to answer as aircraft will ineviteably show as well.
Our management's only responsibility is to the shareholders and as such carries out "sustainable management solutions going forward" in order to identify and isolate priorities that will enable it to fulfill these requirements.

These may at one time or another result in discrepancies that may or may not be entirely conducive to the legal requirements of various government authorities and statutes.

RedTBar is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2007, 00:52
  #5 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
or in other words sometimes they get caught..oops....

Remember it's only illegal if someone finds out....
RedTBar is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2007, 10:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: brisneyland
Age: 48
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No 3% this year sorry. Bills to pay
blackhander is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2007, 10:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 57
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New company strategy: Lure your competitors in with a few phone calls and copy every price movement then dob them in for price fixing whilst escaping penatly yourself as a whistleblower.

Perhaps not.
Romulus is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2007, 11:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: airside
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if Sir Richard now has a body guard?
max autobrakes is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2007, 04:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stralya
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There used to be a thing called responsibility.

The withered uneducated CEO could have a read of the word accountability in the dictionary....

Of Course should it be proven, naturally we can expect Dixon to take responsbility and resign...
QFinsider is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2007, 13:03
  #10 (permalink)  

Retired Tiger pilot
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Club Morocco. Subic Bay. Philippines
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why Cargo and Freight only, unless of course this does include SLF. Would the airlines dabble in similar SLF price-fixing over more lucrative routes. Mi no save masta!
Sharpie is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.