Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Virgin Pilot's EBA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jun 2007, 18:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tent
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have fatigue management at EK and you would not believe what the computer spits out.You will have a bunch of non pilots sipping Latte's entering
data into a fatigue module which wiil decide what is a fatiguing pattern and what is not.It seems you guys had them by the proverbials.Only time will tell.
gj18457 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2007, 11:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Aus
Posts: 764
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Is this the same FMS that was based on train drivers?

Pearl used it for a couple of years and both the pilot group and management decided to drop it like a you know what.

Even if it is not the same one, may I suggest it is to be treated with care.

Once burnt, twice shy.
olderairhead is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2007, 13:02
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney
Age: 53
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh please!!...stop the bitching!...
Hear Hear!

I am sure the EBA might have a clause or two, but the fatigue management system itself has no set limits - except a fatigue score...
wethereyet..On what basis do you make this statement?

Is this the same FMS that was based on train drivers?
If you are interested it is based on a UK CAA publication CAP 371: https://www.auc.org.uk/application.a...e=detail&id=22

Overnights will be reduced to a minimum as they can pax you home with no penalty or cost.
Surely this is a case of you can't please everyone. I am sure there are plenty of pilots with families that would prefer to reduce the number of overnights?
Krumlov is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2007, 14:12
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AssStrapped2aSAAB340
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Krumlov, I only worked under it for three years. For two separate and quite reputable GA companies

It is a free-for-all... fine when your building exp. Does anyone really think this will bring a net benefit to an already undervalued profession?
wethereyet is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2007, 14:17
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Straya
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"wethereyet"

Virgin will not be using the dreaded "fatigue management system" that many loathe and distrust. It has drafted a set or work rules based on the British CAP371 and will replace CAO48, providing it is approved by CASA. This satisfies CASA's requirement to have a "fatigue management system" in place but is not remotely related to any PC algorithm based metod you may have encountered in GA.
Yusef Danet is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2007, 02:28
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amos and Krumlov, it's about proportion not bitching. Congrats to the 47% of VB's who understood that much.

Twenty short years ago you could buy a pretty decent shack in Brisvegas for 100K and that was about what an airline skipper earned.

Now you need 7-800K for the roof over your noggin and the earning is south of 200K.

Something's amiss!!!
bustard is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2007, 22:31
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a pathetic end to a very protracted negotiation.

Once again a pilot group that can't stand together despite EVERYTHING being in their favour. Absolutely pathetic!
Grivation is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2007, 03:13
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: melbourne
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am always amused when pilot's talk about sticking together in Industrial negotiations because one thing that history has shown is that they almost never do ( in this country anyway). Any Eba vote is always about what the individual thinks, not the self appointed generals in the ranks. What is suitable for one person is unacceptable for another and to denigrate them for that really shows some interesting character traits. Any management is trying to get the numbers right to get the YES vote they need. It shows that they are not paying too much on a pure economic point of view. The first vote going down in flames showed that they were well short and they reacted. Even if you offered Cathay A scale wages you wouldn't please everyone. This Eba Vote is over so get on with your life.
coaldemon is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2007, 03:34
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AssStrapped2aSAAB340
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
coaldemon, there are some of us who don't believe in the "ME, NOW!" of modern society.

Those of us who can see that only through sticking together strongly against the wealthy and greedy can a net gain be achieved for real people. To denigrate somebody for a short sighted indivualistic approach in industrial relations is a good thing . If we all become "ME, NOW" people we are a lesser species than monkies.
wethereyet is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2007, 04:14
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Next door to Hell
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Welcome to the Jungle ....
fender is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 12:34
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This EBA was not so much about money, it was about life style and the ability for the comany to live up to it's promise's. They have sold this document with so many promises, a few "will endevours" and a deed for the 777 flying that is not worth the piece of paper it's written on and a threat to take away the EMB from the F/O's.

If these promises are not lived up to, and they have a very bad track record with promises, the staff will really become dis-engaged. And the problem with this is no one really wants to leave and no one really will. So the place will self destruct.

I hope the management get this right, the ball is in their court now, and it's up to them to act in good faith and with a changed attitude to how things are done and implemented. For all parties involved, I hope the "will endevours" work. Time will tell.
dirty deeds is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 13:46
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh for goodness sakes........... would someone please pass the tissues.

Time to move on.

Or move over.

- MP
Managers Perspective is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 14:31
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Club 151
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Virgin Overnights

Can anyone comment on rumours of decreased overnights? Apparently owing to the establishment of more bases?
Private Patjarr is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 16:00
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Pass-A-Frozo:
Just imagine if 47% of pilots moved to another airline.
don't have to imagine mate, remember August 1989? 95% left and the companies manged to scrape through somehow. All be it with the Govts help.
ACMS is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 22:58
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 38,000 ft
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can anyone comment on rumours of decreased overnights? Apparently owing to the establishment of more bases?
This will take time as the SYD base has just opened up. There are still MEL people o/n in BNE and vice versa so its hard to say exactly how much it will go down by.
Also with the introduction of the E-jet there possibly may be more o/n in other ports as we see more aircraft spend the night in ADL, CBR, etc.
With the CC EBA which will be working off the same rules if voted in, I had heard that it will mean about 50% of the flying would be day trips and the other 50% would be overnights.
So too many variables at this stage and as the new rostering system wont be here for 6 months to early to tell.
wirgin blew is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.