Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Council welcomes McArthur River mine decision

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Council welcomes McArthur River mine decision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Apr 2007, 10:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Council welcomes McArthur River mine decision

With an airline in N.T. ramping up for this expansion, this news can not be good.
The Northern Land Council (NLC) has applauded a Supreme Court decision which effectively ceases expansion operations at the McArthur River mine in the Northern Territory.
In October last year the Territory's Mines Minister Chris Natt approved Xstrata's plan to turn the McArthur River mine, near Borroloola, into an open cut operation.
Traditional Aboriginal owners argued the approval process was flawed because the Territory Government failed to follow proper procedures under the Mines Management Act or take environmental concerns into consideration.
Today Justice David Angel ruled in favour of the traditional owners.
The NLC's Norman Fry says it vindicates those who opposed the expansion.
"You simply can't trample over the rights of traditional Aboriginal people from Borroloola and McArthur River region," he said.
"You simply cannot trample over the environmental processes in 2007 that you could in the 1960s and '70s. It's just not on."
A statement released by McArthur River Mining says the company is disappointed with the decision and it will consider the judgement carefully.
Mr Natt says the Government will review the reasons for the Supreme Court's decision and examine all legal avenues before commenting on the decision.
mootyman is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2007, 11:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WLG (FORMERLY PER)
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
i thought airnorth were getting their e-jet to service this contract
topend3 is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2007, 12:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scarenorth management doing a thorough job of examining the strengths/weaknesses/opportunities/threats of expanding into e-jets?

That would be a first.

For the sake of the guys that stuck around and knocked back other jobs on the strength of getting at least two e-jets, I hope scarenorth weren't banking solely on the MRM expansion
ITCZ is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2007, 14:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Nope,
They will be doing KU-PH for Qantas.
illusion is offline  
Old 1st May 2007, 12:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: BackofBourke
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All will be well

Show me the money!
tio540 is offline  
Old 1st May 2007, 13:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
They will be doing KU-PH for Qantas.
I'll be MIFFED if they start that nonsense!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 1st May 2007, 14:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Here we go again. Another bunch of dreamers having no idea what they are getting them selves into.


ONE jet flying one route. GOOD BLOODY LUCK GUYS
RENURPP is offline  
Old 1st May 2007, 23:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: oz
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A bit harsh Renurpp.................

I'm sure they'll make as much money doing KU-PH twice a week with a 30 million jet as Skywest will when their 320s arrive
cunninglinguist is offline  
Old 2nd May 2007, 20:46
  #9 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
All fixed

Someone explained they want to dig holes in the top bit not underground
tinpis is offline  
Old 2nd May 2007, 23:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WLG (FORMERLY PER)
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Here we go again. Another bunch of dreamers having no idea what they are getting them selves into.


ONE jet flying one route. GOOD BLOODY LUCK GUYS
i dont think they will be using it on just the one route RENURRP!
topend3 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2007, 13:49
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WLG (FORMERLY PER)
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I'll be MIFFED if they start that nonsense!
i think this is on the money bloggsy...seems the saturday KNX-PER service was a winner and with KNX not 717 capable QF have turned to TL to run the service on their behalf!
topend3 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.