Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas Shares Decline on Concern Macquarie-Led Buyout May Fail

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Shares Decline on Concern Macquarie-Led Buyout May Fail

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Mar 2007, 01:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Registered User **
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas Shares Decline on Concern Macquarie-Led Buyout May Fail

Qantas Shares Decline on Concern Macquarie-Led Buyout May Fail
By Joyce Moullakis

March 13 (Bloomberg) -- Shares of Qantas Airways Ltd., Australia's largest airline, fell for to a three-month low on concern an A$11.1 billion ($8.7 billion) Macquarie Bank Ltd.-led buyout will be blocked by shareholders seeking a higher offer.

The stock declined 11 cents to A$5.05 at 11:50 a.m. in Sydney, 7.3 percent below the A$5.45 a share offer from Macquarie Bank, Texas Pacific Group and Allco Equity Partners.
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2007, 05:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dununda
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dixon's Ulcer

Dixon is probably having a few sleepless nights worrying about this deal.
Personally I hope the deal falls over and Dixon has to resign,minus his $60mill.
surfside6 is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2007, 11:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Love-in

Wonder if Darth and the Dame will be-embracing-if the deal falls on its ear!!???

Me thinks not.

Probably a back hander to the Chops.
stubby jumbo is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2007, 04:45
  #4 (permalink)  
Registered User **
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard a rumour that stockbrokers are being offered $750 for every client they persuade to sell their QF shares .

If this is true it must only be for large shareholders..then again maybe not.
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2007, 07:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The $750 is the maximum ..see on www.asx.com .. the fifth supplementary statement.
available here

Got another begging letter in the mail today. How long till the big sellers decide?
Agent86 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2007, 08:54
  #6 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 106 Likes on 60 Posts
Hmmm...when they were at $5.35 I told the Missus to sell...bird in hand etc...oh well, thats gambling for you.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2007, 09:00
  #7 (permalink)  
Registered User **
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair call Buster because if the bid fails they might drop to $3.00 or who knows....

You can use the money to pay for your heating bill this mel winter...lol...

If your other half knows how much you made she might spend some time in those seconds shops in Brunswick rd (Is that the one all the hosties talk about?)
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2007, 09:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the reason they wont sell is because they believe they are undervalued.
APA are buying the company to strip it lean and put it back on the market at a lot more than $5.60
so if you got your shares for free and crying that they may go back to $3.00 at least you may be able to keep your job. or would you pefer the $2,600 minus capital gains tax.
i must repeat the companys that will not sell believe the shares are worth more in the near future
domo is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2007, 10:59
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you have had the shares for a while then the CGT is significant. Its another reason why the deal is not all it is cracked up to be; especially for people who like the dividends.

If it fails I can't see how Dixon and Gregg can stay at QF. Nor most of the Board.
Truckster is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2007, 11:24
  #10 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 106 Likes on 60 Posts
Point of order domo. If you are referring to staff shares being free, then I believe they were actually in lieue of bonuses I think...(QF staff will have a better idea of this than me)

Heating bill? Is that...oh my God ...thats sooo funny lowerlobe. ..I ..am...laughing..so ...hard...can't .....type.. ..anymore....

Believe me, she knows how much I make & she knows that fighting over Stella McCartney at Target is the best she'll do...(ie, she didn't bother)
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2007, 12:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sydney
Age: 57
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so if you got your shares for free and crying that they may go back to $3.00 at least you may be able to keep your job. or would you pefer the $2,600 minus capital gains tax
I bought a few at the initial float, then a few in one of the SPP. Combined with the staff shares and using the DRP, the offer from APA was worth $50000 to me.
LME-400 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2007, 20:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bundeena(AUSTRALIA)
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buying in A falling Market

I am hanging onto my shares.
If the deal fails and the share price plummets I will be buying more shares at a hugely discounted price.
I am quite happy to receive the income from the dividends.
The stock price will eventually rebound after the overselling and there will be capital gain eventually.
I am quite happy to wait.
captainrats is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2007, 21:22
  #13 (permalink)  
Registered User **
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buster..I think Sydney is cold enough during winter and Mrs Lobe and I have had a good look at the sunshine coast of queensland when the rugrats have flown the coop.Lots of fishing spots and the weather is fantastic.

As far as my other half is concerned she is devestated at the news that Myers is closing it's Bourke St store as she loves it when we are down in Mexico. I go out to the bikes at Phillip Island or the cars and she has retail therapy.

ASs far as the shares are concerned I'm with captainrats.The company is in good shape and a sound invetsment or APA would not be bothering .The shares will certainly fall if the takeover fails but then Darth will probably go as well and that can only be good for the shares long term.
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2007, 00:10
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil's advocate here for a minute...
There are more than a few pilots here talking about hanging onto their shares. Presumably that means that they agree with Mr Dixon when he says that the share market has undervalued QANTAS for years.
The reason that APA has given for offering a price so far above what everyone else has thought the company is worth is that they think that it's a great business with a fantastic management team and a good plan.
Presumably those who won't sell their shares (on financial grounds, not on principle) not only agree with this - in fact, they think the company is worth even more!
So can I infer from that that despite all the grizzling about every initiative QANTAS management takes (cost cutting, J*, you name it, no one here seems to like any of it), that you accept that these plans mean that the airline is STILL undervalued - even at $5.50+ ??
And let's be honest with ourself - it's the core business and the quality of management and their strategy that investment professionals look at. Quality of pilots and friendliness of cabin crew are not value drivers in the eyes of investors per se (you need them, can't run the business without them, but they aren't factored into the share price).
So it seems that we're left with G.Dixon and his management team and their strategy being key drivers of value - as perceived by investors, anyway.
Anyone here prepared to accept that? Anyone prepared to support the argument that without Jetstar, without the cost efficiencies, without the fuel levies and all the other initiatives - the shares would be worth nowhere near $5??
Seems to me that you can't have it both ways. If you think Dixon and his cronies have trashed the airline, surely you can't also argue that (with the share price up more than 50% in a year) that it's still undervalued?
Not holding my breath, but interested in seeing how both positions can be justified simultaneously....
SW
Swingwing is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2007, 00:19
  #15 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 106 Likes on 60 Posts
Lobee...Once things cross the Murray, that's when everything goes awry! Tell yer Missus that Myer will still be there when she comes down to spend your hard earned! (I know its a must for the shop-starved La-tees from SYD) They are closing the Lonsdale St store, not the Bourke St one. Basically, the store will be halved. (Doesn't mean her shopping bill will be 50% less on the next visit though)

As for Capitalist Gambling...I may be wrong here (I was once before) but...isn't there an inherant risk to hanging on to your shares during a takeover? Can't they, APA, dilute the shares to the point of being worthless? Isn't that what happened at ANZ when Herr Clarke came galloping in & SQ's shares lost value & percentage?

Someone cleverer than me can explain it better I'm sure...
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2007, 05:06
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Metung RSL or Collingwood Social Club on weekends!
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Institutions are holding out for more, it won't happen and they will sell @ $5.60 anyway. Qantas will have new owners, Geoff will get his golden handshake and we'll see SIA - er,sorry,Tiger Airways early 2008.

In the meantime Buster, I see we still have the old timer Mick Malthouse and you still have your old timer Kevin Sheedy and they reckon interesting times ahead in the aviation industry.

I think another 10 years before a flag graces Windy Hill or Victoria Park (Yeah, I know but I like living in the past!!)
Whiskery is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2007, 10:12
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and the sooner you lot get rid of Mick, and the sooner we lot get rid of Kev...
the better it will be!!
Go the Cats!!
amos2 is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2007, 10:13
  #18 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 106 Likes on 60 Posts
Whiskery! Crikey, where've you been?

Yes, the soggy old farts are still in place. For some, inexplicable reason, me ol' mate Eddie added a few years to Malthouses contract. I think he thought Essendon were going to make a play for him... As if!

No, last year for Sheeds I'd say. Daniher out of contract at Melbourne after this one & I reckon the time is right to bring him back into the fold. Finals finish though & perhaps a flag sooner, rather than later.

Amos!

Don't make me put you back on the naughty list again!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2007, 10:17
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...Strewth!!

...you're a tough nut to crack, Buster!
amos2 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.