Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Super Hornets For RAAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Mar 2007, 03:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 38
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Super Hornets For RAAF

$6b fighter plane deal

March 6, 2007 - 2:47PM




Australia will buy 24 Advanced Boeing Super Hornets for $6 billion, Defence Minister Brendan Nelson said today.
Dr Nelson said the acquisition of the Super Hornets would ensure a safe transition to the F35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) over the next decade.
He said the government was able to do this because of its solid economic management and budget surplus.
"The JSF is the most suitable aircraft for Australia's future combat and strike needs," Dr Nelson told reporters.
"Australia remains fully committed to the JSF. But the government is not prepared to accept any risk to air combat and strike capability during the transition to the JSF."
Under current defence plans, ageing F-111 strike bombers will be retired soon after 2010.
The Hornet will fill the fighter and bomber role until the arrival of the Lockheed F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter in the 2014-15 time frame.



http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/...943419483.html
WarmNuts is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 09:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
They're going to be based at Amberley. But Amberley is a BOMBER base!!
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 09:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Gee Bloggsy, the F4s were based there without upsetting the willietown knucks.
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 09:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Novver waste of two engines and fuel

But lets make sure the RAAF and DoD write a complex 'bound to fail' contract that results in 'off the shelf' aircraft being delivered at twice the price some 5 to 11 years after expected

I luv driving on crappy roads whilst politicians and the military piss my taxes (yes I am in the sandpit but I still pay taxes in Oz) up against the wall
Funk is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 10:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Age: 35
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't wait for these new aircraft. The RAAF hasn't had a change in the "multi-role fighter" avenue for years. It should be good.
Ben88 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 10:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Age: 55
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Memo Cap'n Bloggs ... by 2010 Amberley will be a transport base!
Schwerpunkt is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 10:15
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Age: 35
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that definite?
Ben88 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 11:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well they are a Navy aircraft, put them at Albatross, plenty of room there!!! Even better idea, replace the super Seasprites at 805 SQN with Super Hornets
wessex19 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 11:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Age: 35
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds good to me!
Maybe we need some aircraft carriers too?
Ben88 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 13:16
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Great quote from that SMH story:

Group Captain Steve Roberton (Roberton) said he recently flew the Super Hornet in the US.

"This aircraft is an absolute joy to operate and fly and the aircrew are going to love it," he said.

"For a fighter guy it is really nice having the extra fuel, the extra range and the extra endurance. They are yet to make an aircraft that has too many weapons, too much fuel or goes too fast."
Spoken like a true Knuck !!
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 17:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,297
Received 332 Likes on 126 Posts
If the figures quoted are to be believed.....

The unit price for a SuperHornet is around USD $56 for a USN delivery sans weapons. We're buying 24 so at that price and allowing for the exchange rate that would be 24 x 72 = $1.728b AUD.

What about the remaining $4.272 BILLION?

If no weapons are purchased thats a hell of a support budget - $427m a year to run 24 Hornets for 10 years. At roughly 250 hours per airframe per annum thats a tidy $71,000 taxpayer dollars per hour not including fuel.

I hope there are some weapons in that figure. I liked the $4 billion quoted last year more.
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 22:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 225
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I was wondering where they can spend $6 billion on 24 SH's when they quoted $16 bio for 100 JSF's, So JSF was almost $100mio per airframe cheaper.

How do they come up with these numbers???
Joker89 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 22:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its Politicians.. they tell you what they want you to hear...

Again, Porkie pies!
TheColonel is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2007, 00:20
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jandakot, WA
Age: 24
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its simple project management basics.

Initial acquisition cost represents a fraction of through life cost.

The 6bn figure makes sense to me.
control snatch is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2007, 01:40
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Super Hornet will be no match against the fighters that are becoming prolific to our north.

Can ANYONE challenge that statement other than those who discover it is the best thing they have ever flown?

At best the Super Hornets will become a good FJ trainer not much better than the Hornets the RAAF is already using.
Milt is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2007, 03:06
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can ANYONE challenge that statement other than those who discover it is the best thing they have ever flown?
Yes.

Care to back up your claim Milt?
ftrplt is online now  
Old 11th Mar 2007, 03:21
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: sydney
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From Friday's Australian Aviation section :
"One of the biggest advantages was that it was relatively easy for a pilot to switch from the Hornet to the Super Hornet.
But there were fewer advantages for maintenance and support staff, because the spare parts used were not interchangeable.
Dr Davies also said it had disadvantages stemming from its design to operate from aircraft carriers, for the Super Hornet had a stronger undercarriage, making it heavier.
And its wing design was really made for lower rather than high speeds.
"It is therefore behind the performance curve from the beginning when compared to land-based aircraft," he said in a recent report.
The Super Hornet also had poorer acceleration and a lower maximum altitude, he said."
request deferred is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2007, 04:13
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Victoria
Age: 62
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Super Hornet will be no match against the fighters that are becoming prolific to our north.
Such as? In any case the aircraft is only part of the equation.

At best the Super Hornets will become a good FJ trainer not much better than the Hornets the RAAF is already using
Bolleaux!
Captain Sand Dune is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2007, 05:31
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eden Valley
Posts: 2,157
Received 92 Likes on 41 Posts
he Super Hornet will be no match against the fighters that are becoming prolific to our north.
I though the air threat relatively "benign" and the Super Hornets procured to meet a shortfall or capability gap emerging in the strike role ie: F111 retirement.

The threat to our north, at present, is best viewed in the context of recent tensions between Malaysia & Indonesia. The Indonesians deployed their entire operational F16 force to Balikpapan- four aircraft with limited weapons capability.

Their SU27's are unarmed. A recent follow on order may address this. Still, in terms of numbers, electronic and information technology, training, access to weaponry, the Indonesians are a long way behind the RAAF. Now throw in servicability to the mix.

Malaysia, by all accounts, is having serious problems with servicability too. Perhaps, the recent Sukhoi purchase, will be riddled with the corruption which left their Mig 29 fleet with servicability rates around 30%.

Last edited by Gnadenburg; 11th Mar 2007 at 06:56.
Gnadenburg is online now  
Old 11th Mar 2007, 06:11
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: inner suburbia
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some views from both sides ;
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/nationalint...htm#transcript
Biggles_in_Oz is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.