Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF and mr Dixon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Dec 2006, 09:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF and mr Dixon

Evening all
Newbie so please be gentle!
In reference to other/existing/growing threads, happy if mod wants to kick it around and place it somewhere else:

1. Respect GD for making the move and ordering 737NG as replacements after the AN "collapse" (Hello ANZ!!), good cost savings;
2. Respect GD for the very public trust etc setup, money is money to someone/somewhere;
3. do not be too surprised should there be some tax break in it all; whatever you may wish to think total mug and GD are, indeed,an oxymoron;
4. the airline game has changed, low cost is mantra, strangely service is overlooked (certainly by "management" although allegedly airlines I thought were a "service" industry, silly me!, but is it ignored by the passengers ????????????????)
5. other threads talk about the A380 and deployment/different companies /size of scale/all important "who'll operate them" etc (willn't even START to go into payscales etc.
Today's talk is tomorrows fish&chips paper to these management types - anyone who want's predict their future based on the musings of the likes of GD and AJ, well can I sell you the Sydney Harbour Bridge?? - pleeaase?? Good price!! You'll be a VERY lucky buyer at this price!!

Almost final thought - should the above give any indication I am a GD fan then you are wrong - however I do believe, regardless of personal perspective, there's no point in denying certain trends/facts.

Fact: I am far too lazy, indeed computer illiterate to be able to paste threads but I read in GD announcemant a week ago, in the final paragraphs, words to the effect that it was not the "workers" who made the wealth in QF but the magician at the top.

People mistake managememant and leadership; - I will feel deep regret and sadnessfor the families and friends of GD when GD passes but should GD pass the day after he retires I would find it surprisingly fitting.
Where else could he spend his (ill gotten) gains but in hell??

Leadership does not equal management and management does not equal leadership - but on the flightdeck if I see them same-same I do, indeed, feel a warm inner glow. Probably just me, dumb pilot!
Not really ready to set out on a life of screwing people - yet, but should I follow in the footsteps of GD-sensai I would have a wonderful teacher!

Sorry for not useing smilies - beginners got to start somewhere!
galdian
galdian is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2006, 13:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Thumbs down

Hi In response to Item 1 of your post. Following 9/11 and AN's collapse, both Boeing and Airbus were offering very cheap aircraft. Dixon personally preferred A320's over B737's because of the more spacious cabin and his plan to rapidly expand Qantas and grab market share vacated by Ansett was to acquire A320s painted in QF colours which would be flown by National Jet pilots with the existing B733/4 fleets being gradually retired and the short haul pilots then being absorbed into B767/B747/B744 and the soon to arrive A330 fleets. The then AIPA president (now CP) strongly told him that there would be extremely expensive industrial action taken by mainline pilots if he went down that path. Dixon thought it through over the weekend and announced on the Monday that the order would be for B738's which would be crewed by mainline pilots. This preserved pilot career progression within Qantas for a few years until Dixon finally got his way by playing the Impulse card and starting up Jetstar. He acquired cheap A320s flown by Impulse pilots and ex AN pilots for less than even the National Jet guys.

He is quite simply a businessman who doesn't give a sh1t about people who work for him.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2006, 21:09
  #3 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs up

Ah yes, I recall that one now. Credit where it's due, that would have to be classified as a 'win' by Chris (refer another thread where various QF drivers were discussing wins and losses by various regimes) and a big one at that.

To be honest I think getting that flying was one of the reasons the pay freeze was so easily accepted. Majority of pilots say the expansion and worked out that they were getting a pay rise through seat change so it was easier to swallow. Personally I always felt the two issues were separate (they should be because of those crew who won't get a promotion or seat change).

It's a shame that it's all been down hill from there! Perhaps in the not too distant future similar statements may be made regarding parking aircraft in exotic destinations. Funnily enough I don't reckon I've seen anything from new AIPA that would indicate that they would make a similar call.
Keg is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2006, 22:00
  #4 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,499
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Hang on...weren't the 737NG's originally being built for American Airlines? Didn't AA get serious sphincter contractions after 11/9 and were more than happy to offload to a fellow One World member???
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2006, 06:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Buster Hyman
Hang on...weren't the 737NG's originally being built for American Airlines?
Yeah Buster, they had been ordered for AA but were still on the assembly line - some at a very advanced stage of assembly. AA cancelled their order and Boeing offered them to QF very cheap provided they were taken with the configuration that AA had specified. I understand the special deal price is valid for the initial 15 aircraft plus 60 options. The current QF B738 fleet is 33 aircraft with 5 special performance versions on order, so thay can still acquire many more bargain priced B738s.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2006, 05:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aus
Age: 42
Posts: 381
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
The current QF B738 fleet is 33 aircraft with 5 special performance versions on order
Special performance versions? Have not heard this term before with the 738's. Are they higher gross weights/increased thrust variants?
turbantime is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2006, 09:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bumf*ck, idaho
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Special peformance= smaller engines again.

After the HUGE success of derating the 737-400 engines back to 22K (anyone gone out of canberra lately in a 400???), the QF beancounters have deduced that there is no reason whatsoever to stop the new 800's being fitted with this special performance option.
Sonny Hammond is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2006, 23:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
The special performance version gives a higher payload out of limiting runways even with the lower thrust rating on the donks.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2007, 22:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know anything about the rumour that these "SP" 73Hs are destined for Canberra routes and will thus be decked out with more J class seats (or have convertible seats like the -400s)?
apacau is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.