Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

A380 X-wind

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Nov 2006, 01:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 X-wind

Whether you like the thing or not, there is always something about crosswind landings....... particularly those who do them better than me
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9BgwLbPIwI
J
J430 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2006, 06:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Thumbs up

In an effort to minimise the number of diversions that the A380 will do in commercial service, Airbus want to have the A380 certified for 45 knot crosswind on a 45m (150ft) wide runway. The drift angle and pilot eye position that would result would be amazing.
Going Boeing is online now  
Old 20th Nov 2006, 10:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: wide left base 16"
Age: 53
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, very impressive. Excellent handling display there!
Now, lets see him do that a fully loaded 185!
Shredder6 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2006, 10:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 54
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Going Boeing
In an effort to minimise the number of diversions that the A380 will do in commercial service, Airbus want to have the A380 certified for 45 knot crosswind on a 45m (150ft) wide runway. The drift angle and pilot eye position that would result would be amazing.
Full doco details it, they demonstrated with 40-50kts x-wind. The angle in this clip is as crabed as it'll look really (same footage)
podbreak is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2006, 23:55
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
X-Wind Limit

What is the x-wind limit for the B744 and 743?

I have heard of approaches being done successfully, flown by hand of course, in 45knots..........

J
J430 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2006, 01:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,560
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Classic case of not using into-wind aileron on the rotation/liftoff. If he'd lost No 1 then, things would have been really sporting.
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 21st Nov 2006, 03:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by J430
What is the x-wind limit for the B744 and 743?
I have heard of approaches being done successfully, flown by hand of course, in 45knots..........
J

The Classic is 30kts, I assume the -400 would be the same.
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2006, 03:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fliegensville, Gold Coast Australia
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here we go ........waiting for the " '74 can handle 60kts cross wind, before Airbus even knew what a cross wind was" argument now.
Fliegenmong is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2006, 05:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: International
Age: 76
Posts: 1,395
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
The B777 demonstrated x/w component for take-off and landing in my airline is 38 kts. Guidelines given by Boeing are 45 kts for a dry runway and 40 kts for a wet runway.
B772 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2006, 10:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Established.
Age: 53
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....and that is 38kts on one engine manual OR auto landing.
The Messiah is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2006, 04:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: International
Age: 76
Posts: 1,395
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Fliegenmong
Here we go ........waiting for the " '74 can handle 60kts cross wind, before Airbus even knew what a cross wind was" argument now.
A380 test pilot Claude Lelaie is quoted as saying the A380 took off and landed with 56 kts cross wind in Ireland two weeks ago.

That is some feat amd I consider outside my comfort zone.
B772 is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2006, 02:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Downunder
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
J430 Whether you like the thing or not, there is always something about crosswind landings....... particularly those who do them better than me
"those who do them better than me" - you must mean - "computers who do it better than me. Funny - my autopilot flies straight and level better than I can as well.
OPSH24 is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2006, 03:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OPSH24

The Airbus’s I fly (A330-300, A340-300 & A340-600) have an Auto Land crosswind limit of 20 kts, well below the maximum crosswind limit which must be flown manually. Boeings all have a similar limitation. Oh and please don’t tell me the computers are still flying the aircraft when I flare the aircraft and put a boot full of rudder in to straighten up. If you do, you obviously don’t understand the flight control laws of the airbus FBW aircraft.
404 Titan is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2006, 10:33
  #14 (permalink)  
tlf
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Age: 67
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 404 Titan
OPSH24

The Airbus’s I fly (A330-300, A340-300 & A340-600) have an Auto Land crosswind limit of 20 kts, well below the maximum crosswind limit which must be flown manually. Boeings all have a similar limitation. Oh and please don’t tell me the computers are still flying the aircraft when I flare the aircraft and put a boot full of rudder in to straighten up. If you do, you obviously don’t understand the flight control laws of the airbus FBW aircraft.
They have laws to follow?
I thought they pretty much did whatever they felt like on the day
tlf is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2006, 20:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: .
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
404,

When you do get on the rudder to kick it straight, does the FBW maintain the last sidestick commanded Roll attitude i.e wings level, or do you still cross control it with the sidestick to counter the yaw induced roll?


Cheers,

Con
Contract Con is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2006, 22:47
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Contract Con

In “Flare Mode” lateral control is supposed to be the same as in “Flight Mode” i.e. “Normal Law” therefore maintains wings level. It rarely can achieve this though particularly in strong crosswind conditions. In these conditions it is best to be flown like any conventional aircraft, cross control in the flare but keep the wings level.

The rudder on the A330-300 (except the enhanced version), and the A340-300 isn’t FBW. It is as convention as the rudder on your B737.

Elevator in “Flare Mode” is in “Direct Law” which simply means that what you input into the side stick is directly reproduced in elevator deflection, just as it is in a conventional aircraft like your B737 except you use a yoke.
404 Titan is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2006, 01:02
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: .
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
404,

Thanks for the info. I knew it did some funny things regarding control law close to the ground.

I'm suprised that the rudder is not FBW on the Big Buses.

Can they contol the rudder following an engine failure with the Auto Flight system engaged? Or is it old school like the Boeing, size 12 until you have it in trim?

Cheers,

Con
Contract Con is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2006, 02:00
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Contract Con

I assume you are referring to an engine failure after V1 but before the auto pilot is engaged after take-off. Again the big bus is just like your B737. It requires a good boot full of rudder to maintain directional control and a positive rotation at Vr to about 12 ˝ degrees. Once established in the climb at V2 or what ever speed is attained if the engine failure occurs airborne, trim the rudder out and engage the auto pilot. Once engaged the auto pilot can fly the aircraft in is asymmetric state, i.e. maintain directional control and auto trim the rudder. If the engine failure should occur in the cruise the auto pilot can handle the failure. No rudder input is required from the pilot.

The rudder is FBW on the A330-300 (Enhanced) and the A340-600. I would assume it is FBW on the A380 as well. Even with these aircraft having a FBW rudder, they still work in exactly the same fashion as an aircraft with a conventional rudder. I believe though that the A380 like the B777 will have a few tricks up its sleave reference the rudder if an engine should fail during the take-off run.
404 Titan is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2006, 06:47
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: .
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks 404,

I was referring to a failure whilst the auto pilot is engaged. You answered my question.

The 73 can't control the rudder at anytime. (aside from a little yam damping now and again)

Cheers,
Con
Contract Con is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2006, 02:17
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see the big Dugong is back in Oz again.

Any news from down south???

J
J430 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.