Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Who's been shopping for Qantas?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Who's been shopping for Qantas?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2006, 12:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who's been shopping for Qantas?

November 9, 2006
Australia's Qantas Airways on Thursday downplayed a media report that the airline was facing a potential takeover by a private equity group.

"I don't think it's happening," Qantas Chief Executive Geoff Dixon said when asked if a hedge fund had been buying shares in the airline.

Dixon was speaking at a panel discussion at an aviation industry conference in Singapore.

Qantas shares closed at a four-year high on Tuesday after an unsourced report in The Australian Financial Review newspaper said a private equity fund was eyeing the company.

(Reuters)
jupiter2 is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2006, 17:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 357
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Selling Selling Selling

Don't care who wants to buy, they can have mine at $4.37 who ever they are.

I'll buy back in when it returns to $2.80 in six months after the JetStar launch and some spin has wound down.
Mud Skipper is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2006, 18:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
I get the distinct impression that the rats are leaving the sinking ship - no not Qantas. I believe that major American investors are trying to get their hands on non american assets before the U.S. Dollar tanks. I think I understand that KKR just bought Vivendi for $50 Billion, and they had a $16 billion (?) bid for Coles.

I therefore wouldn't be surprised to see them look at other Australian "Asset classes" Bluescope steel, AGL, etc.

But would they want an airline? Nah!

Maybe Mr. Packer wants it instead. I can think of a number of (unprintable) reasons he might.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2006, 22:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sunfish - I agree. Trade agreements such as the one with Oz enable US companies and investment houses to slowly move into more stable markets in case the greenback tanks (which it will).

The picture is so much bigger than "Dixon is nasty and taking away my chances of promotion".
The Professor is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.