Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Darwin STARs: What is Going On Up There??

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Darwin STARs: What is Going On Up There??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Nov 2006, 21:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the Dog house
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GOG

They did eventually depart ' 30 sec stream I think. Lead also quoted MARSA which didnt really apply and wasnt notified etc and off they went (range time pressure an all that) cant remember exactly what was issued at the time but was probably in line with tracking instructions (though not sure how they managed their initial tracking with no radial info avlbl to them) along with some requirements to mantain a certain min gradient of climb to at least stay at or above the vertical element of the SID. Appreciate that many bits of MATS are open to interpretation sometimes, as discussed many times in many other posts, so have no wish to get too involved here. Point of the post was really to try and show that the current set up doesnt always benefit all parties most of the time; as was the issue raised by thread starter. As an aside Im sure that there are often still instances with foreign aircrew where what is said / issued by ATC is not what the pilots expected or understood from their interpretation of the rules and vice versa.


DogGone

Last edited by BurglarsDog; 26th Nov 2006 at 21:42. Reason: spellin
BurglarsDog is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2006, 21:39
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by drshmoo
Senor Jones, you got nuthin, you 2 post hero. WTF would you know about what a navigator could do. Go back to swimming in that shallow gene pool of yours
long live the navigators.....the backbone of the raaf.
pfff schmoo. nice try champ. just coz you could have used a nav to stop you from getting lost in the bungles pattern doesn't make them the backbone of anything.

i'd suspect you were a right-seater yourself, but you'd know that it looks more like this these days..



p.s my gene pool is that shallow i can wade through it.
señor_jones is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2006, 02:08
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bob....

'Aptitude testing for Air Defence and Air Traffic are exactly the same - or at least they are now."

Ummmm yes maybe, but if you bang out of an Airdefendo course you will not get offered an ATC course. The natural progression through the chain of events if you get scrubbed (if you are still seen as an asset to the system) is from Pilots course to Nav, Nav to ATC and well unfortunately if all goes to a complete can of poop you can always be an AirDefendo. If that doesn't work out then you are back down at BP pumping gas and thinking about what could have been....

My instructors probably still claim to this day I would have been a better AirDefendo (putting them together is much easier than keeping them apart!) but 5 countries later thankfully nobody has cottened onto it yet!
Fox3snapshot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.