Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

It's Official - Virgin Blue to Get Jungle Jets

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

It's Official - Virgin Blue to Get Jungle Jets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Nov 2006, 10:02
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
August 07 according to an AFAP memo. 3 aircraft to be delivered in 07 and the remainder in 2008 from memory.
Warped Wings is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2006, 03:10
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Toluene Diisocyanate
Aircraft capacity is irrelevant.
I am aware regional pax are screened on arrival in sydney. However I thought that with aircraft over a certain capacity passengers had to be screened prior to the flight. Theoretically if a 737 was to fly DBO-SYD the pax would need to be screened in DBO where as a Dh8 could have paxed screened in SYD on arrival. Is that not correct?

Can't find anything after a quick look on the DOTARS website.
ditzyboy is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2006, 03:43
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 116
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why worry about that sort of crap. Just look after the pointy end and you will have less heart burn!!!
Break Right is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2006, 04:58
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Way out of town
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ASTA 2004 says what?

Well, I'm no expert but I am pretty sure that the Aviation Transport Security Act 2004 and associated regulations only require passenger screening for "jet air services" which only applies to a portion of the "security-controlled" airports.

All "security-controlled" airports must have at least one trained person to screen passengers in case DOTARS ups the screening requirements.

Therefore, the introduction of a jet air service will require a terminal upgrade (ie a sterile area) and ongoing operational costs associated with the passenger screening.

Thats definitely something for these places to consider.

LF
low_flyer is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2006, 09:08
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Warped.
rescue 1 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 08:30
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Toluene Diisocyanate
DJ, the security measures are exactly the same for props as they are for jets. If the outport has no screening, then PAX will have to be screened at the first port that has screening facilities. For VB, that will probably be the capital city. Otherwise it means all get off, go through the screening and re-board.
So Tommy/Tammy Terrorist will be able to board at an unscreened airport with an arsenal of weapons and have his/her way with the plane?
Or even worse secret them on the plane which does a SYD/MEL/CBR leg for example?

I don't think so.

I don't Joe/Joanne Public will take too kindly that a JET will not have a screening done. It was bad enough out ports like Port Lincoln, Ceduna, even Kangaroo Island with many pax querying lack of security.

I think Ditzy Boy is heading down the right track something to do with capacity, but then again it might be form of propulsion.

Look at ADL at the moment. All REX pax jump in a bus that gets driven to their "terminal". How easy is it to commander a bus, even if its got Keanu Reeves or Sandra Bullock driving it.

I still think that if jets start operating to regional ports (lets call them category 2 ie no full time AFP or full luggage screening) then their is going to be a truckload of infrastructure to be built, manned and eventually paid for by Joe/Joanne Public just so that port can now have jets flying into it.

And I'm not even going start on the tech issues that these planes might need ie all the nav gear, emergency response teams and so on.
I have no doubt that there are more qualified people who will read this and advise exactly what a jet will need going into say Albury or places where VB think they'll pick up 100,000 plus people.

And will the Govt market move across? Not likely if they are entitled to business class.

The Kendell CRJ in flight service was brilliant, the plane was faster and quieter than the 146, Ansett forced some of those routes to Kendell to operate as they were making a huge loss, and the Govt market screamed blue murder due to no biz class. Senior Ansett people even blamed Kendell for this, which goes to show how much these dudes knew what their regional service was offering!

Rock on!
Deejay 1 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 11:35
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: melbourne
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow and I heard that the Crj was the second most expensive aircraft to run in the Ansett fleet according to the administrators ( and as accountants they would have an unbiased opinion) , and that would be why Bombardier have thirty + of them in the desert while Embraer sell everything on the production line. Bombardier are reacting to this by making 1300 workers redundant in Ireland (as you would). Lets send that category D machine to Albury that makes sense and should make us heaps of money. Lets face it the Embraer for Virgin will be used to enchance routes that a 737 should never have been on like Sydney-Mackay and Adelaide-Hobart not take over fully fledged 737 routes as Ansett tried to do. Lets hope they have a better result than Rod.......
coaldemon is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 11:37
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: aus gold
Posts: 100
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Deejay 1
So Tommy/Tammy Terrorist will be able to board at an unscreened airport with an arsenal of weapons and have his/her way with the plane?
Or even worse secret them on the plane which does a SYD/MEL/CBR leg for example?
I don't think so.
I don't Joe/Joanne Public will take too kindly that a JET will not have a screening done. It was bad enough out ports like Port Lincoln, Ceduna, even Kangaroo Island with many pax querying lack of security.
I think Ditzy Boy is heading down the right track something to do with capacity, but then again it might be form of propulsion.
Look at ADL at the moment. All REX pax jump in a bus that gets driven to their "terminal". How easy is it to commander a bus, even if its got Keanu Reeves or Sandra Bullock driving it.
I still think that if jets start operating to regional ports (lets call them category 2 ie no full time AFP or full luggage screening) then their is going to be a truckload of infrastructure to be built, manned and eventually paid for by Joe/Joanne Public just so that port can now have jets flying into it......!
Why don't we put blockades around all the cities and get every truck inspected in case it carries a load of fertilizer that turns into a bomb, or a million other things that some could do. Armed gaurds on city buses in case they get hijacked. You have got more chance of being killed by a pack of 'killer bees' than a terrorist.

This airport security screening etc is a load of sh.t and everyone knows it but it makes 'important people' feel good & feel they are doing something. Typical political feel good crap that goes on all the time once a politician gets his hand on something that may get some votes.

There are so many holes in the cheese why even raise these issues and encourage some 'prick in high places' to look for more ways to waste our hard earned tax dollars. How many threads has there been on Prune re the stupidity of the current system. DON'T ENCOURAGE THEM, they get enough ideas that look good but ineffective, without our help.

I live in hope that common sense will prevail one day but I guess I will die a dreamer.

Give the passengers in some of these more remote places the chance of a decent service instead of some 'cigar tube' or irish shed that should have been scrapped years ago. (I do realise thay may just about be phased out now but Sydney-Dubbo-Parkes in a Metro recently was not that exciting).
maxter is online now  
Old 9th Nov 2006, 21:04
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Virgin Blue EMB 170 and 190 pics

From the Embraer website


Looking forward to getting these!!!!
Big Hairy Potatoes is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2006, 05:03
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 38,000 ft
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks good. How do they match up for flight times over the longer distances? Do they have cargo bins underneath?

Lets get this topic back on track.
wirgin blew is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2006, 22:18
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WLG (FORMERLY PER)
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
just to clarify, airports with jet services must provide screening of pax as per the regs. turboprops are screening exempt. so any ports who receive the new embraers, under the current regs, will be required to provide screening for all passengers.

I don't believe screening at the next port is a viable option and I doubt DOTARS would allow this to occur in any case, all airports in Oz that receive RPT jet services MUST provide pax screening...

Back to the subject, the new jets do look great, with them and the new IFE being rolled out on the 737 fleet they are certainly going to give QF/JQ something to think about...
topend3 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2006, 02:01
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Do they have cargo bins underneath?
If you're talking about containers, no they don't. When I was in the hold last, they are quite pokey. I wouldn't like to be the baggage chuckers esp on the 190 unless it has a carpet.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2006, 02:22
  #53 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ts&Cs on the ticket will need to be modified to include "Kitchen Sinks not accepted".
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2006, 02:29
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really think that this is the perfect family of aircraft for the population density and distances traveled in Australia. I have only flown as a passenger on the Embraer 170, but it is in no way a regional jet at all. The sophistication of the cockpit and its sheer size would surely prevent it from being classified as such?
Chris Higgins is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2006, 02:43
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in them thar hills
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to mention the acquisition cost. Only the big airlines like DJ will be able to get the utilisation and economy of scale that such an investment requires. A couple of smaller local players are dreaming if they think thay can make new jungle jets pay. Better for them to look at....the GAS CHAMBER....
gas-chamber is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2006, 01:05
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: with the porangi,s in Pohara
Age: 66
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....so what are they going to "pay" the Capt and F/O to fly these things???
...we all know they are nice pieces of equipment,lets get down to the nitty- titty...PB
pakeha-boy is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2006, 02:25
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: .
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PB,

Embraer Captain
July 2007 N/A $112,000
July 2008 3% $115,360
July 2009 3% $118,821
July 2010 3% or >CPI (Max 5%) $122,385
July 2011 3% or >CPI (Max 5%) $126,057

First Officers will be paid the appropriate percentage of a Captain’s annual salary as follows and in accordance with the effective dates of increase given to Captains:
(a) Level 1 - 55%
(b) Level 2 - 60%
(c) Level 3 - 65%


Cheers,

Con
Contract Con is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2006, 02:36
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: with the porangi,s in Pohara
Age: 66
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Contract Con...thanks mate,...actually not a bad pay rate at all...better than I expected...the boys here are being paid less than that,so whomever is negoitating your rates/payscales is doing bloody good job....will have to pass this on as Ive done the AUS/US conversion ...and many will not be happy...especially if its for the 190.....PB
pakeha-boy is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2006, 08:28
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Contract Con has left out the $15400 (roughly) retention payment that increases by about 3% per year.

This takes the 1st years salary for a skipper to about $127000
Dehavillanddriver is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2006, 09:26
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, oz
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What sort of range does this aircraft have compared to the 737-700 /800?

Would it have the legs to go from MEL to somewhere like Port Vila for example?
priapism is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.