Pilot Drain - Apart from the RFDS
Thread Starter
Pilot Drain - Apart from the RFDS
Ok, pages debating th e pros and cons of the RFDS is enough. What abut the rest f the industry. Is there actually a shortage of pilots
Grade 1 Instructors
Low level Charter guys
Metro (turbine driver)
Grade 1 Instructors
Low level Charter guys
Metro (turbine driver)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: flyville
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some of the light to medium Turbine charter operators ( my own company included) are currently finding difficult to get pilots with experience ie 1500-2000hrs +.
I don't know if that contitutes a shortage.
Operators higher up the food chain , Skywest , Alliance are still turning guys away with 5- 7000 hrs. Obviously no shortage there.
RC
I don't know if that contitutes a shortage.
Operators higher up the food chain , Skywest , Alliance are still turning guys away with 5- 7000 hrs. Obviously no shortage there.
RC
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why would you bother to go into an industry with a barrier to entry of $100K to do your licences and rates ( not including the opportunity cost of lost earnings while studying). And what is at the end of it? If you do OK after a few years you might end up in the left hand seat of a Brazilia on the princely sum of $55K (including super) or if you REALLY make the big time with a jet operator such as National Jet you will pay $15K for a B717 endorsement and get 20 roster changes in a month.
Oh, and by the way within a couple of years all these hard years of work will come to nought as you will be by-passed for the decent jet jobs by some rich boy who has paid the $$$$ for a MPL- Multi Crew Pilot Licence who will do 150 hours in a sim and go into the right hand seat of an A320/B737 etc on apprentice wages.
Oh, and by the way within a couple of years all these hard years of work will come to nought as you will be by-passed for the decent jet jobs by some rich boy who has paid the $$$$ for a MPL- Multi Crew Pilot Licence who will do 150 hours in a sim and go into the right hand seat of an A320/B737 etc on apprentice wages.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: out there
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about we try and be positive about this "so called" movement alidad.
From what i hear, there are more jobs in GA now than previously.
Havent been in the oz scene for a while but if it's true, it's good to see!
From what i hear, there are more jobs in GA now than previously.
Havent been in the oz scene for a while but if it's true, it's good to see!
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some of the light to medium Turbine charter operators ( my own company included) are currently finding difficult to get pilots with experience ie 1500-2000hrs +.
A catch 22 me thinks. if you don't employ and train em, they aint gunna be there when you need em.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Changes
The times they are a changing. If you employ and train them, you need to keep them for a while. The future will have lots of casual employment (not good for anyone), contracts, purchased training, multicrew pilot licences and bonding. Just like the RAAF and the airlines.
I forecast this a long time ago. The floods of wannabies have been excessive, and have undermined the career GA pilot (yes he DID exist, and will again) and all but destroyed conditions in GA. It's all been artificial. There never were that many jobs. So now the career GA pilot has gone overseas, or into another job, it is not so easy to find 1500 hour, or 3000 hour pilots. The professional bush pilot hardly exists anymore. and many of the wannabies have gone somewhere else to try to pay off their loans.
But of course we cannot expect the "highly educated" pilots to stay in GA though, can we?
I forecast this a long time ago. The floods of wannabies have been excessive, and have undermined the career GA pilot (yes he DID exist, and will again) and all but destroyed conditions in GA. It's all been artificial. There never were that many jobs. So now the career GA pilot has gone overseas, or into another job, it is not so easy to find 1500 hour, or 3000 hour pilots. The professional bush pilot hardly exists anymore. and many of the wannabies have gone somewhere else to try to pay off their loans.
But of course we cannot expect the "highly educated" pilots to stay in GA though, can we?
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: aus
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting, astute points there DirectAnywhere. The effects of an MPL licence on existing supplies of GA 'cheap' (airline hour-building) labour will be interesting indeed.
How quickly things are changing...
How quickly things are changing...
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Next, and it's only my thought, most if not all people entered aviation to fly for an airline. It was true for me. I know it's a generalisation but bear with me.
The professional bush pilot hardly exists anymore. and many of the wannabies have gone somewhere else to try to pay off their loans.
I think the employer paying for the endorsments, then bonding the pilot for an amount of time, proportional to the cost of the endorsment would be quite appropriate. win-win for the industry. employer gets an employee thats going to stay for a while, employee gets an endo at minimal to no cost and a job to build hours in.
Now we just gotta get the "work for nothing brigade" sorted out and things look a little better for GA.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: down south
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yadot
AIPA has written to the minister and is challenging the MPL saying it is bad idea that will lead to a reduced standard of Australian pilot compared to what we know today and is simply being pushed by airlines in the interests of the airline's bottom line.
AIPA has written to the minister and is challenging the MPL saying it is bad idea that will lead to a reduced standard of Australian pilot compared to what we know today and is simply being pushed by airlines in the interests of the airline's bottom line.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Globalisation effects?
Would like to throw something in which is talked about here occasionally, and that is increasing globalisation of all industries, not just aviation.
At present, pilots in Australia essentially represent one of the few remaining "closed shops". Along with professions like doctors and lawyers, it is basically "no ticket no start" - although we are obviously seeing the increase in overseas trained doctors in response to medical shortages. This situation has been tenable in aviation because supply and demand have been roughly balanced, and because the barriers to entry are so high.
However, the same closed borders do not exist elsewhere, particularly in the boom markets of India and China. Expat labour (pilots and management) there basically makes many such operations run. As markets become increasingly open, labour will go where it is needed. This is the elephant in the room when people try to confine the debate about pilot shortages to the domestic Australian market.
The same applies to capital. In my view, QANTAS will not exist in its current form in 20 years time. Its free cash flows have been sufficient to date to fund expansions and aircraft purchases, but this can't last forever. Basically it needs (or will need) more capital in the decades ahead than the foreign ownership restrictions currently allow it to raise.
Accordingly I think we will eventually see the foreign ownership cap lifted (or at least substantially relaxed). As soon as that happens, QANTAS will be ripe for takeover by a cashed up foreign carrier like Cathay or SQ, probably with support from a global private equity firm - almost exactly like what we are seeing now in the media space.
When that happens, what will happen for pilots? The situation will probably be a whole lot more open than we currently see with the restricted set of players (AIPA, JPC, QF etc). Who will have the leverage - pilots or owners? If the Asia wide shortages that many predict are biting, then maybe pilots. But whatever else happens, I think there will be much more two way flow of labour than we currently see. Perhaps a key enabler for this would be an ATPL (like the JAR one) which is more transferable throughout Asia, although I admit this does not look likely through current fora like ASEAN.
Would be interested in the thoughts of those like Chimbu Chuck, who are living and working in this environment now and who know a lot more than me about this sort of thing...
cheers
SW
At present, pilots in Australia essentially represent one of the few remaining "closed shops". Along with professions like doctors and lawyers, it is basically "no ticket no start" - although we are obviously seeing the increase in overseas trained doctors in response to medical shortages. This situation has been tenable in aviation because supply and demand have been roughly balanced, and because the barriers to entry are so high.
However, the same closed borders do not exist elsewhere, particularly in the boom markets of India and China. Expat labour (pilots and management) there basically makes many such operations run. As markets become increasingly open, labour will go where it is needed. This is the elephant in the room when people try to confine the debate about pilot shortages to the domestic Australian market.
The same applies to capital. In my view, QANTAS will not exist in its current form in 20 years time. Its free cash flows have been sufficient to date to fund expansions and aircraft purchases, but this can't last forever. Basically it needs (or will need) more capital in the decades ahead than the foreign ownership restrictions currently allow it to raise.
Accordingly I think we will eventually see the foreign ownership cap lifted (or at least substantially relaxed). As soon as that happens, QANTAS will be ripe for takeover by a cashed up foreign carrier like Cathay or SQ, probably with support from a global private equity firm - almost exactly like what we are seeing now in the media space.
When that happens, what will happen for pilots? The situation will probably be a whole lot more open than we currently see with the restricted set of players (AIPA, JPC, QF etc). Who will have the leverage - pilots or owners? If the Asia wide shortages that many predict are biting, then maybe pilots. But whatever else happens, I think there will be much more two way flow of labour than we currently see. Perhaps a key enabler for this would be an ATPL (like the JAR one) which is more transferable throughout Asia, although I admit this does not look likely through current fora like ASEAN.
Would be interested in the thoughts of those like Chimbu Chuck, who are living and working in this environment now and who know a lot more than me about this sort of thing...
cheers
SW