Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Dixon`s Follies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Aug 2006, 04:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Heaven
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dixon`s Follies

The Profit at QF over the last few years would have been much greater except for :
1.$200mil wasted on QF Business Eq IT platform ..it still doesn`t work
2.$150mil wasted on upgrading the classic...who notices the difference?
3.$250mil wasted on the IFE system....still doesnt work
4.$60mil wasted on Jet*Asia..still bleeding arterial red ink
5.$50mil wasted on AO...its now folded back into mainline as wetlease
6.$45mil... the decline in Jet* profit 2005/2006.
7.The mis match of Airbus A330 200/300s to routes
On the other hand :
1. Staff have agreed to wage freezes......SARS and 911
2.The introduction of casuals
3.The introduction of Partime
4.The introduction of AKL LHR and BKK bases.
5.The reduction of crew complements fleet wide.
On balance you can see that QF employees are being made to pay for the incompetence of management.
Yet these individuals still continue to reward themselves.
No One is more concerned about the survival of QF than its employees.
Employees are in for the longhaul.
How many managerial faces will still be around in 5 years?The revolving door in operation!!
I feel sorry for the poor bugger who takes over from Dixon...it will be a bloody large mess to clean up
DEFCON4 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2006, 05:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Alpha Centauri
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Staff Reward System

Dixon is so grateful to staff for the sacrifices that they have made he is rewarding them....WITH AWAs.
Helluva guy that Goof...er sorry Geoff.
argus.moon is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2006, 11:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A comprehensive list of honours there Defcon4.

Don't forget the $100 million or so spent on the brand new A330s converting the galleys for longrange operation after QF worked out that they couldn't be used effectively on shorthaul ops.

Easy fix that one.
Just sack a few more staff and send a few more jobs offshore.

As for rebuilding after the lowlife has left.
I'm not so sure that there will be anything left to rebuild.
speedbirdhouse is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2006, 23:40
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
The floggings will continue until morale improves.........
Sunfish is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 01:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: airside
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about the story doing the rounds about the A330 captain ,the one with the "KILLER" nickname ,up in Shanghai who after the inbound aircraft went around (back to Hong Kong I believe) was left with a group of upset passengers. This chap pulled out all stops and he and the rest of the crew did a stirling job in turning around a potential PR disaster for Qantas.
A letter to Dixon from a CIP passenger/customer praising this captain with the "Killer"of a nickname meant dispatches were despatched down the food chain of command to the appropriate manager to reward said chap in the appropriate Qantas way. Well , said manager who has a name like that castaway basketball called this particular captain in and proceeded to tell him that he was made of the right stuff.
Keep up the good work, Qantas looks after loyal employees, calls made to the finance department,
a big production made with the presentation of this gift for a job well done.
Said Captain departs said managers office feeling suitably proud of a job well done and then opens the piece of paper presented to him as a token of Qantas' eternal gratitude.
Guess what it was???
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

It was a voucher for a Latte at the cafe downstairs.
Got to love the largesse that just oozes from every pore of the Qantas beast don't you!

Last edited by max autobrakes; 21st Aug 2006 at 04:29.
max autobrakes is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 04:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
I thought it might be an invoice for the extra expense.....
Sunfish is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 05:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Outofoz
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Might have been worse.....Could have been for a cappachino
hotnhigh is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 06:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On point 7 in Defcon's post, wasn't this caused by the business class floor in the 200's being unsuitable for the international configuration?

As the aircraft were initially to be used domestically, a bean counter saved some bucks by not having the original floor specified to the required strength for bigger international J class seats.

Anyone have a dollar figure for that little gem?

Happened on Dixon's watch, he's got to accept responsibility.

For that and the rest of Defcons points, I'm sure Geoff will be happy to provide an explanation to the shareholders.
Reeltime is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 06:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: God`s Country
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Further Costs

I used to:
1.Always vote to extend my duty hours..not any more
2.Never use my transport entitlement...I do now...always
3.Sign on early...not any more
4.Occasionally assist on my days off...not any more.
5.Dry clean my uniform once a month..now its after every trip
6.Write ICANS...not any more
7.Onsell the QF product.....not any more...Everyone should fly somoene else.
8.Push Duty Free hard....not any more.
9.Suggest ways of reducing costs...not any more.
10.Apologize for management service failures....now its with French or Duty Free.
Multiply my small act of passive resistance by even a few hundred and it has an impact on the bottom line and hopefully on someone`s bonus.
I do my job well...but not as well as I used to.
The passengers benefit but certainly not the management
mach2male is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 07:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Reeltime
Happened on Dixon's watch, he's got to accept responsibility.:
Dixon was also the guy whose face fell when told personally by an A330 crew that he was wrong about the soon-to-arrive A330-300's having a longer range than the -200's.
If that doesn't tell you something about the way QF is being run......
The_Cutest_of_Borg is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 08:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: australasia
Posts: 431
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
What about the rather expensive rebuild of the BKK golf buggy.

Or was that on the bow tied idiot's watch.

Maui
maui is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 08:42
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You'd best get used to it. (or move to Japan, or continental Europe)
Survey of 399 managers from 5 countries. You'll probably find Aussie managers responses are similar to UK and USA.
Question: What is more important, Jobs or paying Dividends?
Pass-A-Frozo is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 09:22
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Mach2male has it to a tee. GD's actions have a ten year timeframe before they affect performance. Flight and Cabin crew have an immediate effect on profitability. Only difference is that it is impossible to measure the repeat business gained/lost by cabin crew/flight crew.

I know which is more important, and it ain't Dixon's pronunciamentos.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 10:03
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
I used to:
1.Always vote to extend my duty hours..not any more
2.Never use my transport entitlement...I do now...always
3.Sign on early...not any more
4.Occasionally assist on my days off...not any more.
5.Dry clean my uniform once a month..now its after every trip
6.Write ICANS...not any more
7.Onsell the QF product.....not any more...Everyone should fly somoene else.
8.Push Duty Free hard....not any more.
9.Suggest ways of reducing costs...not any more.
10.Apologize for management service failures....now its with French or Duty Free.
Multiply my small act of passive resistance by even a few hundred and it has an impact on the bottom line and hopefully on someone`s bonus.
I do my job well...but not as well as I used to.
The passengers benefit but certainly not the management

Exactly, and I suspect this attitude is the extremely common at present and not just on mainline. Very bloody sad isn't it.
RENURPP is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 10:36
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sleeping
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont care anymore.....One can only do so much to help out so much before one doesnt care.....

89 is coming.....

Im outta here
Beg Tibs is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 21:33
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bundeena(AUSTRALIA)
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Accountability

It would appear that only those lower down the foodchain are accountable for anything.
Dixon and his crew have made some enormous stuff ups.
The Dame should have made him responsible but she doesnt know what the hell is going on.
No care No Responsibility :The world of QF management.
Get paid a bonus for screwing up...no wonder Dixon stays
captainrats is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 22:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DEFCON4, you should add on all the salaries, bonuses, super and associated costs of those managers responsible for the stuffups too.
Lodown is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 08:29
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere safe
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Compliant Media

Interesting that none of this stuff ever hits the media.
A large advertising budget certainly carries a lot of sway,particularly when you want to cover up wholesale incompetence.
What body is responsible for maintaining corporate governance standards ?
A barrage of correspondence may do some good(sic)?
Le 3rd Homme is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 10:13
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Company results are released publicly. I guess you mean that they never hit the "mainstream" media. No surprises there. Have a think about it. When was the last time you cared or bothered to find out the in depth cashflow of say Zinifex or Coles / Myer?
Pass-A-Frozo is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 10:21
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: YBBN
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Corporate Governance Principles Privelage the Contributors of Capital

Riley (2003) writes that "Common Law corporate governance principles traditionally impose no obligation on company directors to consider the interests of employees when deciding how to manage the corporate enterprise. The directors duty is to regard the best interests of 'the company' and the company has been defined as the shareholders. .......The notorious case of Parke v Daily News Ltd (1962) Ch 927 held that a company director was in breach of his duty to the company (ie, shareholders) when he caused the company to pay retrenchment benefits to long-serving employees, because the company had no strictly enforceable legal obligation to make those payments".


scramjet is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.