Sacked Australian Shipping Crew - When is it our turn?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sacked Australian Shipping Crew - When is it our turn?
Sacked ship crew stand firm despite fines threat
A group of seamen sacked by the owners of an Australian tanker docked in Hobart says they are prepared to risk big fines for taking industrial action over the issue.
Eighteen crew from the Stolt Australia were sacked last night, as part of a plan to reflag the tanker under a Cayman Islands flag, and hire cheaper, foreign labour.
The group are still refusing to reload the vessel or leave it, vowing to stay on the ship until they get their jobs back.
The crew members have ignored union advice that their protest could incur big industrial relations fines.
At a protest earlier today, spokesman Roy Muir said he and his colleagues hoped their actions would highlight the impact of Federal workplace changes on Australia's shipping industry:
"1996 there was 104 Australian-manned ships, now we're down to less than half of that - if this one goes it's just another one so - shame Johnny shame," he said.
Mr Muir says he and his colleagues feel they have to take a stand.
"Stolts have been the recipient of shipping reforms, crew reductions via multiskilling and training, including government funding, and still they're not prepared to commit to the employment of skilled, experienced and safe Australian seafarers," he said.
Meanwhile, the Australian Maritime Union (AMU) says the practice of allowing more foreign shipping crews into Australia is a chink in the nation's armour.
AMU spokesman Mike Wickham says the disappearance of Australian-crewed ships from Australian waters is a worry.
He says local crews have to go through rigorous security checks that many foreign crews do not, and that puts Australia at risk.
How long until this happens to honest Australian aircrew guys???
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems...7/s1682140.htm
A group of seamen sacked by the owners of an Australian tanker docked in Hobart says they are prepared to risk big fines for taking industrial action over the issue.
Eighteen crew from the Stolt Australia were sacked last night, as part of a plan to reflag the tanker under a Cayman Islands flag, and hire cheaper, foreign labour.
The group are still refusing to reload the vessel or leave it, vowing to stay on the ship until they get their jobs back.
The crew members have ignored union advice that their protest could incur big industrial relations fines.
At a protest earlier today, spokesman Roy Muir said he and his colleagues hoped their actions would highlight the impact of Federal workplace changes on Australia's shipping industry:
"1996 there was 104 Australian-manned ships, now we're down to less than half of that - if this one goes it's just another one so - shame Johnny shame," he said.
Mr Muir says he and his colleagues feel they have to take a stand.
"Stolts have been the recipient of shipping reforms, crew reductions via multiskilling and training, including government funding, and still they're not prepared to commit to the employment of skilled, experienced and safe Australian seafarers," he said.
Meanwhile, the Australian Maritime Union (AMU) says the practice of allowing more foreign shipping crews into Australia is a chink in the nation's armour.
AMU spokesman Mike Wickham says the disappearance of Australian-crewed ships from Australian waters is a worry.
He says local crews have to go through rigorous security checks that many foreign crews do not, and that puts Australia at risk.
How long until this happens to honest Australian aircrew guys???
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems...7/s1682140.htm
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: concert hall
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just read it......similar issues on threads throughout here. What is the action that should be taken by us in aviation?........strikes?.......or does coward st. know what will happen anyway
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Welcome to Pacific Blue
Why not reflag Virgin Blue as Pacific Blue, and hire cheaper labour to crew it? PB has an Australian A.O.C. now, albeit with some limitations. Those limitations can be removed or lessened. The bean counters have no notion of loyalty or honour, and I applaud anyone who has the balls to stand up for what they believe in. 
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah I am sure there are similar threads. I havn't really been much into PPRUNE until lately - so much to get fired up about these days!
Anyway, it was something that I saw in the news and it got me thinking. I'm interested to hear what others think.
I understand that this ship will only operate in Australian waters. I'm not sure if that is anything significant - or could this same sort of thing have happened years ago (say under a Labour government?)
Anyway, it was something that I saw in the news and it got me thinking. I'm interested to hear what others think.
I understand that this ship will only operate in Australian waters. I'm not sure if that is anything significant - or could this same sort of thing have happened years ago (say under a Labour government?)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oz (30% of the time)
Age: 62
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"1996 there was 104 Australian-manned ships, now we're down to less than half of that - if this one goes it's just another one so - shame Johnny shame," he said.
As far as aviation goes, we already have foreign crews operating in Australian airlines today compliments of a labour government. The only difference is they earn good money !
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Careful I don't know for sure but I would have thought things were vastly different for Waterfront workers and [I][Seamen/I].
Besides thats not really the issue anyway. The Waterfront may well have needed a cleanup, but this is about replacing Australian labour with foreign labour (In Australia).
Besides thats not really the issue anyway. The Waterfront may well have needed a cleanup, but this is about replacing Australian labour with foreign labour (In Australia).
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oz (30% of the time)
Age: 62
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W I was going to specify the era but did not wish to incur the wrath of your goodself ! 
Smart thinking, Jack. Very smart thinking!!!
Had to be careful lest I cause reason to ban myself!!!
Sunny Woomera
Smart thinking, Jack. Very smart thinking!!!
Had to be careful lest I cause reason to ban myself!!!
Sunny Woomera
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess I see your point guys. What I really am worried about is a foreign owned company, operating foreign owned equipment, with foreign labour, but entirely within Australia!
It obviously is possible now, but what about in years gone by? If it has always been the case then what are other's views on this?
It obviously is possible now, but what about in years gone by? If it has always been the case then what are other's views on this?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has been going on for years in the shipping industry...
Has anyone heard if this is incorrect?
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: some were in the southern hemisphere
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
from what i can see as a non ozzie, the goverment is all for it. get everything you own and have into foreing hands. well apart from the snowy's, for now at least. i have heard rumors that they will sell the kangaroo icon to the yankee's soon and get the next pm from somewere overseas.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I look forward, with some anticipation, to Kerry O'Whatisname from the 7.30 Report interviewing Kim Beasley, or even better, one of his predecessors - (you know, the his silver haired bodgie one) - on what his reaction is to this outrage.
I seem to remember some other bloke with an Irish sounding name warning Australia 17 years ago that they were condemning themselves to a future like this if they let the Silver Bodgie get away with bringing in foreign labour at the time.
True to form, the great Aussie unwashed - including far too many within the Aviation industry - because it didn't affect them directly at the time, (or for some, because there was a short term advantage to be had from the situation), ignored those warnings.
I seem to remember some other bloke with an Irish sounding name warning Australia 17 years ago that they were condemning themselves to a future like this if they let the Silver Bodgie get away with bringing in foreign labour at the time.
True to form, the great Aussie unwashed - including far too many within the Aviation industry - because it didn't affect them directly at the time, (or for some, because there was a short term advantage to be had from the situation), ignored those warnings.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Southern Sun
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spot on Wiley!
It is also my understanding legislation passed at the time by a Labor government allowing importation of foreign labour still stands.
This occurred at a time when a Labor government introduced individual awards forerunner of AWAs.
Matter of record actually.
United we stand; Divided you will fall!
DK
It is also my understanding legislation passed at the time by a Labor government allowing importation of foreign labour still stands.
This occurred at a time when a Labor government introduced individual awards forerunner of AWAs.
Matter of record actually.
United we stand; Divided you will fall!
DK
Registered User **
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Totally concur with DK and Wiley
except the industrial legislative framework then introduced by Labour was not as specific in individual terms as the current AWA's and therefore was not as practical to apply. It's easy nowadays, get the sucker to sign away all his/her rights before commencement and give all control to the employer - very much open to abuse.
Besides , its not a labour -liberal thing, its an employer-employee thing.
I see no indication that Australian Management (including middle mans and those aspirinational yes-men) will not abuse these AWA's to serve their own interests.
Slippery slope, if you give in easily, they'll just take more.
except the industrial legislative framework then introduced by Labour was not as specific in individual terms as the current AWA's and therefore was not as practical to apply. It's easy nowadays, get the sucker to sign away all his/her rights before commencement and give all control to the employer - very much open to abuse.
Besides , its not a labour -liberal thing, its an employer-employee thing.
I see no indication that Australian Management (including middle mans and those aspirinational yes-men) will not abuse these AWA's to serve their own interests.
Slippery slope, if you give in easily, they'll just take more.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kim Beasley has just congratulated the crew for standing up for themselves and defending Australian jobs.
Sadly, you can be almost certain there won't be a single Australian journalist who'll take him to task over this - and precious few people who'll recall Bob Hawke's illegal actions in 89.
Sadly, you can be almost certain there won't be a single Australian journalist who'll take him to task over this - and precious few people who'll recall Bob Hawke's illegal actions in 89.