Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas -- SYD JFK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jul 2006, 04:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas -- SYD JFK

Why does Qantas not fly direct between SYD and JFK? Why does that flight have to be routed via LAX?
shon7 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 05:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bumf*ck, idaho
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because they don't make the 747-400 with big enough fuel tanks yet.
They could probably make to Vegas on a good day then they'd be gliding.
Sonny Hammond is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 09:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SYD
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They'd also need an a/c with a massively increased AGTOW to life all that extra fuel.

The 777-200LR and other long-range twins might make it possible one day.
Mike773 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 22:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,397
Received 228 Likes on 104 Posts
Just did that flight 2 days ago - Sy-LA took 13 hrs 20 and LA-JFK took 5 hrs 15, a big haul if you tried it in one hit.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 02:27
  #5 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Devil

Great circle track:
SYD-LAX 7488 nm
SYD-JFK 9950nm

An extra 4:20 @ 500 knots! I can hear others calculating the O/T already!
Keg is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 02:42
  #6 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Great circle track:
SYD-LAX 7488 nm
SYD-JFK 9950nm
Why not go the other way?
tinpis is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 05:21
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can NOT believe that "shon7" has got off so easy with this question .

Surely its UN-AUSTRALIAN to let someone off with a question such as this without being lambasted for it ????

Come on people .Fire up
Bolty McBolt is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 05:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: AU
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given poor old shon7 launched this thread below, we might be dealing with a new Jetstar Management pilot

Brake Temperature
Upon arrival at the gate and after coming to a complete stop if you see the brake temperature rising would this indicate that the airplane has been chocked incorrectly?

What would a rise in brake temperature and pressure indicate in such a scenario?
Eagleman is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 06:09
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mostly at home
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, after years of lurking, shon7 got me to register ....

First, Keg (with his magnificent contributions to sanity over the years), really means statute miles - SYD-LAX is 6600 nautical miles - or at least that's what the flight plan keeps telling me.

The simple facts are, that a 747ER can do about 16 hours flight time with 182 tonnes Jet A (that's what we squeezed on the other week). Even if SYD-LAX were 13 hrs, that still leaves you 2 hrs short to get to JFK. And why would you want to go to JFK with less than 15 tonnes?

To answer tinpis .... SYD-JFK eastbound IS the shortest way. To go the other way is into headwinds.

Rgs.
noip is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 09:32
  #10 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
fish

Oops. Bugger.

noip is obviously far more senior than me. I'm only due for my first SYD-LAX later this week which means that I didn't notice the obvious (now) error. I didn't even gross error check the flight time with the distance. Mistake was using the 'default' units of sm rather than changing to nm!

Correct figures are:
SYD-LAX 6507
SYD-JFK 8646

I use this web site:

http://gc.kls2.com It's great for all sorts of calculations. Have a look at some of the ETOPS issues on various city pairs. Of course, they use about 380 knots as their ETOPS speed and they provide a link that tells you why they don't allow you to specify your own company ETOPS speeds.

Enjoy.

PS: Noip, thanks for the vote of confidence. Sorry to let you down on this one!
Keg is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2006, 02:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Keg, does the great circle track SYD-JFK pass north or south of LAX?
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2006, 03:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,093
Received 175 Likes on 37 Posts
I'm not Keg, but it's south. Check the link below.

http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gc?PATH=S...OR=&MAP-STYLE=
DirectAnywhere is online now  
Old 11th Jul 2006, 03:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: AU
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Keg, are you sure your ready to operate to JFK?
Eagleman is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2006, 05:29
  #14 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Eagleman
Hey Keg, are you sure your ready to operate to JFK?
Strange sort of question Eagleman! Whether the answer is yes or no (and I have a personal opinion on that one anyway) it's ultimately all a bit academic really. I'm not going there in the next four weeks and I'll be nothing short of astounded if I go there on any trips in the bid period after that. Give me LHR every day of the week before a crappy AKL-LAX-JFK trip.
Keg is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2006, 09:06
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Keg
Give me LHR every day of the week before a crappy AKL-LAX-JFK trip.
At least you can leave the hotel...

(and recently it's been very nice down at the Blue Anchor for an evening pint! Only three tube stops & a short walk.)

The GC track on the link above - tracking south of LA - was, I think, one reason why Qantas (back in about 2000) was planning to go to DFW direct and ordered the ERs. 11 Sep stuffed those plans a bit.

Actually those speaking with the 'birdies' - would a 777 variant able to do YSSY-EGLL direct both ways (reliably year-round), also be able to reliably do direct JFK without payload uplift restriction year-round?
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2006, 17:33
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,415
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Question for QF'ers:

Does Qantas operate east of LAX, i.e. JFK, ORD, and BOS or are they code shares? I have flown to OZ via LAX on AA flights from JFK. What equipment and schedule? Do it non-stop and my wife might even go.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2006, 20:10
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mostly at home
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GF,

QF operates 5 times / week LAX-JFK with 747-400 aircraft.
QF108 .. JFK-LAX-SYD
QF107 .. SYD-LAX-JFK

If you escape JFK with no major delays, you can even change at LAX and go:
QF94 LAX - MEL (Melbourne)
QF26 LAX - AKL (Auckland)


There was the intention to go LAX - ORD a few years ago, but that was scrubbed just before the services started.

Rgds
noip is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2006, 23:27
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Going nowhere...
Posts: 345
Received 25 Likes on 4 Posts
What about DFW...

There were persistent rumours in the QF corridors a few years ago about SYD-DFW direct if/when a suitable platform could be found (777LR/747ER); the idea being that it would match better with the big American Airlines hub there for onwards networking on codeshare flights while avoiding the LAX bottleneck.

SARS & 9/11 put such talk to bed until recently again, but I've now heard informally from an AA pilot that AA no longer has a DFW base. Can anyone shed light on;
- whether that means the AA hub is also scaled back,
- perhaps it's just the crew base that's closed? and
- what're the alternatives, if any, being talked about in the QF-400 bars around the world?
I'm having trouble raising my previous contact...
Jetsbest is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2006, 00:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maharashtra
Posts: 154
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
A month or so ago there was talk from the DCP at a meeting of the possibility of another North American destination and a couple of South American destinations. Also 400 will be going back to NRT as of next year. So I guess we will just have to wait and see....
regitaekilthgiwt is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2006, 04:09
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To those whom have flown the route LAX-JFK I will bet non of you flew the great circle route to get there.

I have seen QF planes fuelled LAX-JFK with 90 - 100 K of fuel during the Tornado season, with accompanying flight plans flying over gulf of Mexico to Florida before making a left to fly up the coast via walla walla washington to JFk, or flying adjacent the Canadian border as far as SEA-TAC then down the coast for LAX.
Even with a 777-200ER you may not be able to make the distance SYD - JFK
Bolty McBolt is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.