Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Airbus may offer Qantas a stop-gap

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Airbus may offer Qantas a stop-gap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jun 2006, 14:24
  #41 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Devil

Originally Posted by Going Boeing
....the purchasing department ordered 7 A330-200's and 6 A330-300's without any input from Engineering and Flight operations.
I think the correct term in the highlighted area was '...disregarding adverse comment...'!
Keg is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2006, 14:57
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like Airbus has its fair share of problems at present. Guvmints of France and Germany calling for some management heads to roll. (Historical response from the French.)
Lodown is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2006, 09:34
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canberra Aust
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Going Boeing's response

Thanks for your detailed response Going Boeing. That fills in the gabs for me. Still enjoy paxing on the aircraft though. Maybe its because the A330 is a relatively new aircraft.
Cheers
Raider1 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2006, 03:20
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Raider1
If you enjoy paxing on the A330 you must be up the front end.
As the back end is a different story altogether.
The aircraft is known by engineers and cabin crew alike as the "vomit comet"
Endless amounts of pax vomit spewed over the last dozen rows of seats and floors.
The seat cover replacement is double that of the 767 and 747
Bolty McBolt is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2006, 10:37
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: R1P
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ordered A330-'s without any input from Engineering

My understanding was that a team of Qantas engineers went to Boeing and then to Airbus to inspect and evaluate both options. However after recommending that Q stay with Boeing and stay away from Airbus product, Airbus started throwing money and promises at GD and he ignored Engineering recommendations and went with Airbus because they were "cheap".
radiation junkie is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2006, 11:25
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canberra Aust
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A330

Well GD did spend some time with Ansett when i was there and the A320 was verrrrrrrry successful for AN particularly eastern states to Perth...... hence maybe why Jetstar now have A320's as an economical solution for discount operations and GD thinks other models might work for QF and subsideries.

Last edited by Raider1; 29th Jun 2006 at 11:37.
Raider1 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2006, 14:07
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Junkie
What I meant was that there was no Engineering/Flight Operations input to the Ordering/Contract phase. There would have been a lot of extra things specified by these two branches if they had been involved. I also heard that Engineering had advised management to avoid the Airbus product but the bean counters couldn't look past the acquisition price.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2006, 14:20
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Delays with the A380?

Reminds me of another era when major delays with a European aircraft partly resulted in lost business. The Concorde had significant delays. By the time it was finally ready for delivery, Boeing had scooped the pool with the brand new 747 and the market had irrevocably changed. I get the impression a similar event is underway now.
Lodown is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2006, 07:06
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Global
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not gloating just vindicated

From: AAP
July 06, 2006
MOODY'S Investors Service today affirmed the Baa1 long-term rating of Qantas Airways and changed the outlook to negative from stable.

As per post #33.

The rat is on the slippery slope, its time now for the shareholders to stand up and be counted. Maybe “Dirty Harry” said it right. “you gotta ask yourself, do I feel luck? Well do ya?”

It is time for a change, ask yourself why LH, AF, BA, SQ and CX are making money and returning value to shareholders while QF whines about crew cost and maintenance and fuel costs…..

Everybody else faces the same costs what is it that makes Australia’s so much different…… (oh yeah I almost forgot its your “productivity” bonus’)

Face it Coward St you have it wrong, your not leading by example, you have cut the wrong parts, disenfranchised the staff, bet on the wrong horse, all because you don’t listen to your own people.

Why is it that CRM teaches us to work as a team and use the crews experience and knowledge to arrive at the best answer.

While those in Coward St act as cowboy’s and not part of the “team” by continually displaying their contempt to anyone that may have a better idea or more specialised knowledge in a particular area.
international hog driver is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2006, 09:05
  #50 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've heard that there was a story on a German tv station that Airbus and EAD has sacked management with respect to the delay on the 380...has anyone else seen this story?
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2006, 09:22
  #51 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,523
Received 106 Likes on 60 Posts
Yes, it was in the papers here lowerlobe.

With regard to Dixon quoting the fuel prices et al, as a need for the downsizing & cost cutting, I really wouldn't worry if I was QF staff. I'm sure he'll raise all the previous manning levels & conditions once things settle down!......
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2006, 10:52
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus are to supply Qantas with more A330's and A340/600's as an interim replacement for the A380.
Z Force is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2006, 10:53
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,096
Received 183 Likes on 39 Posts
What's your source Z force?

If true, it's amazing how QF has ended up with the fish that John West rejected, with higher fuel burn than than the 777-300, on the day oil hits a new record price and our "Dear Leader" -or "Great Leader" your choice - continues to blame high oil prices for QF's predicament.

They'd better be cheap!!!
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2006, 13:01
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lowerlobe, there were also accusations of selling stock a day or two before the official announcement of delivery delays.
Lodown is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 04:42
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,576
Received 88 Likes on 34 Posts
The extra airbii (plural ?) will be cheap - just like their crews.

How convenient that the lowest paid jet pilots in Oz are all endorsed on the Airbus and part of the 'Qantas Group'.

Surely it's a great opportunity for Qantas to put Boeing on the spot and see what they can come up and move away from the cheap Airbus crap once and for all.

TL
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 05:41
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Queensland
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Transition Layer
The extra airbii (plural ?)

TL
Only if the singular is airbius..........
BelfastChild is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 07:44
  #57 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I realise that this is just a remote possibility but imagaine the financial ramifications if QF and SIA and others cancelled the 380 because of further problems....

The European Governments would have to step in to save airbus...
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 11:15
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by lowerlobe
I realise that this is just a remote possibility but imagaine the financial ramifications if QF and SIA and others cancelled the 380 because of further problems....
The European Governments would have to step in to save airbus...
Well they stepped in to start it!

Oh, behave!


Lodown - apparently Forgeard's family sales kicked off in March.

What will be fun IMHO is if BAE's audit kicks up anything 'interesting'. None too happy at the Rothschild valuation.
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 14:57
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ozmate
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reliable birdie tells me QF are at this moment looking VERY seriously at B777-200LR all J class or a mix of J and "Premium Y" class to do direct SYD-LHR etc.
woftam is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 23:36
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: out of a suitcase
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AirBum

As in 'curriculum' and 'curricula'..... wouldn't it be 'AirBum' and 'AirBa' ??
captaindejavu is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.