Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar pilot life expectancy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jun 2006, 11:34
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Icarus obviously has nothing to do with aviation. If this is not the case then the simplistic calculations are surely a result of stupidity.

In addition to the 42 days leave are compulsory course/ground school/simulator/renewal days. Usually at least another 14 days. Therefore only 10 months remaining in which to fly 900+ hours. This is of course forgetting that even pilots have the odd day sick.

Now lets not forget Sign on Time 1:00 hour prior to departure +30 minutes per turnaround, barely time to breathe before next departure and 15 minutes of duty after arrival. So the "4hours" per day ends up at closer to 9 hours of duty. But lets not forget the many days that include 7 hours plus flying plus the above mentioned buffers.

I am not complaining, as I chose this profession. It simply annoys me when ignorant people quote crap that they haven't the foggiest about.

It is still not a bad days work, if you love it.
fistfokker is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 01:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
42 days annual leave!

How many pilots have had their leave either assigned or cancelled to suit the peaks and troughs?

A reasonable management technique to cover planning inadequacies, but is it reasonable fatigue management when you are achieving 900 plus hours each year out of the pilot group?

No amount of money can reduce fatigue!
Lagrange is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 04:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
900/year?

oh what i'd give for 900/year.

some of us are looking into the bowels of aeroplanes for near on 2500hrs/year....oh, minus leave of course - 160hrs/year - so that's only 2340hrs/year.

no wonder i want to go flying
nzmarty is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 08:22
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in them thar hills
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
900 flying hours over 10 months is not so hard. Did it for years in my youth. The only thing better than that would be 900 hours in 9 months and have 3 off. Once I did 1000 with a foreign operator in just under 10 months and had a great time with the enforced leave for the rest of the year. As long as the hours can be flown at civilised hours and not lots of late nights or early mornings back to back. You gotta love your leave and treat it as sacrosanct. I always, always took it, never let them pay me filthy money instead. Hence I am still healthy, touch wood. Lots of American operators get 1000 or more and only allow 2 weeks leave. Now that's hard and potentially life-threatening and shame on the FAA for allowing it.
Any pilot who sells leave back to the Company is letting the side down big time. Management only see this as proof we are driven by greed and destroys the safety argument.
IMHO it it is not the flying hours that makes or breaks the spirit, it is all the duty time and crewing patterns that need to be factored in by the health experts and fatigue management systems.
When fatigue gets dangerous pilots absolutely owe it to themselves to go sick or go elsewhere. One of the few times that I ever flew when seriously fatigued I made an error of judgement that could have been expensive for the operator. While it might have served them right, it would not have looked good on the resume so I resolved to just go sick if I ever got too tired again.
gas-chamber is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 09:22
  #25 (permalink)  
ur2
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NZMARTY,
A 7hr flying day is 7hrs at the controls and another 4.5 at work.
Typical of a non pilot to see 900hrs/yr as that is all you actually do all yr.
ur2 is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 12:44
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: airside
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lots of luck trying to do 900hrs a year on the route network/schedule that is proposed.
Try closer to 750hrs a year as a starting point.

While your at it ,how is Joyce going to sell tickets in Japan .
Internet sales won't work.The only way to sell tickets in Japan is through travel agents.

Once again lots of luck.

More and more JetStar is appearing to be nothing more than a short term vessel to screw down the costs in the primary carrier, Qantas.
max autobrakes is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2006, 16:30
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the A380 delays and the a/c changes due to one B744 u/s in JFK. Will J* Int get all the A330-200 at this point in time, or will they lease more? Just a thought after a long day and a few drinks
rammel is online now  
Old 25th Jun 2006, 03:24
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,886
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
Icarus obviously has nothing to do with aviation.
WRONG.
If this is not the case then the simplistic calculations are surely a result of stupidity.
Possibly. I may be stupid but I can divide 900 by 10.5 and arrive at a figure less than 90 which was my original point!

3 holer said...
Doing 900 hours plus p.a. equates to over 90 per month. (Assuming 42 days leave p.a.)
My post simply pointed out the inconsistency.
fistfokker if I agree with you that sim days, ground school etc takes up two weeks then we are left with 10 months to fly (minus sick days) agreed? (Q: Is sim time part of the 900 hours anyway?) So 900 hours divided by 10 months is 90 hours per month, agreed?
Given that most months have about 21 working days (assuming 5 days on 2 off in a week) then 90 hours a month averages out at 4.3 hours per day. Didn't I say
Say four hours a day(average) over a five day week
In fact if the month has 22 working days then the daily hours becomes 4.1. Clearly this is average for all the days that you fly over 7 hours there are the other days that you fly about 3, true?

We are talking flying hours, stick time, block time whatever you wish to call it. I thought it was too bleeding obvious to add in pre and post flight duty, that is a different subject.

nzmarty brings in a touch of the real world I think. Perspective is everything.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2006, 04:26
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Luke Skywalkers mums bed
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What happens if they crash and it was caused by fatigue and it becomes known the boss made a staement like that?
Alien Sex God is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2006, 07:07
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: melbourne
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought that Jetstar operates under the exemption so they can do 1000 hours a year.
coaldemon is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2006, 07:16
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,886
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
ASG
What happens if they crash and it was caused by fatigue and it becomes known the boss made a staement like that?
A statement like what?
Ninety hours a month is an average of about 4.3 hours per day? Outrageous, fancy making such ridiculous and clearly flawed statements. Stone him, stone him...
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2006, 07:48
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Icarus2001

I believe he meant this statement. posted by eagleman on page one. Apparantly refers to a comment joyce made at a meeting involving DAME's.

He said he expects JQ pilots to burn out in 6 to 7 years, but he is not worried, they will be easy to replace.
RENURPP is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2006, 11:06
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The dark corner of the bar
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

1000hrs a year looks manageable if your in an office, with access to the amenities to make your day comfortable. id say the 6-7 years is more like 2-3. Especially if your an older individual!!. false economy i think youd call it.

A power nap could save your life. cheers DM
Douglas Mcdonnell is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2006, 11:34
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coaly,
I believe that NJS are the only ones with that little gem!
yowie is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2006, 11:41
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Not Syderknee
Posts: 1,011
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the management teams see it as they see their own day. Work 9 to 5 is an 8hr day.
What they don’t see is the lunch brake they get, the numerous coffee/smoke breaks, the fact that a pilot day may start at almost any hr of the day or night. Even the ability to get up and walk around for a bit.
'I work an 8hr day driving my desk, the pilots should be able to do the same driving the plane.'
rmcdonal is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2006, 21:18
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bumf*ck, idaho
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cause you just put the autopilot on, theres nothing to do these days, is there?



My neighbour came out with this the other day, I felt like punching him.
Sonny Hammond is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2006, 03:30
  #37 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: AU
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AJ does not believe fatique is an issue. Everyone is tired at the end of the day!! Besides, as Big Bruce of BCG fame said, "I put in more hours that any of our pilots every day".

It is tragic that firstly, CASA issues the exemption to airlines that have no fatigue programs in place but secondly, does not bother to audit their application.

The ATSB report into any JQ accident will mirror three previously issued reports
Ansett 747
Monarch
Seaview
These reports had two common threads -
Incompetent CASA oversight
Management incompetency in the airlines concerned

So much for learning lessons from the past!!!!


Eagleman is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2006, 03:38
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eden Valley
Posts: 2,157
Received 92 Likes on 41 Posts
Eagleman

Why don't J* blokes do something about it? Fair enough if you don't have the clout, unity or balls. But stop blaming everyone else for your woes.

It's the fault of Qantas pilots, it's CASA's fault, it's Joyce's fault, it's the ex-Ansett pilots fault.........etc etc.

You have been quick to sign off on any deal for your own gain. When the stark reality hits, it's everyone elses fault.
Gnadenburg is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2006, 04:06
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bumf*ck, idaho
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A little thing called the LAW.

1.4 Notwithstanding anything contained in these Orders, a flight crew member shall not fly, and an operator shall not require that person to fly if either the flight crew member is suffering from, or, considering the circumstances of the particular flight to be undertaken, is likely to suffer from, fatigue or illness which may affect judgement or performance to the extent that safety may be impaired.

Unless AJ or GD now has more authority than the Attorney General, this debate is just playing AJ's game. Move on.
Sonny Hammond is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2006, 06:25
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eden Valley
Posts: 2,157
Received 92 Likes on 41 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue-Footed Boobie
So much for a duty of care towards pilots and the future of Aussie aviation.
You guys crack me up. Respect yourselves and other will follow suit.

It doesn't matter if J* pilots burn out in 6 years. Who cares? Most probably can't go anywhere else anyway- perhaps a job in a ragged LCC in China or India- same money but no tax.

When you were undercutting everyone and signing off on below average CofS, you were all boasting how wonderful avation was. Not so now eh.

Welcome to reality. Your reality!
Gnadenburg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.