Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

JQ recruiting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Apr 2006, 07:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OneDotLow, I thought you were on the classic at QF these days.
EPIRB is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 07:51
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: C9-H6-N2-O2
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Howard,
You might be interested to know that ALL Qantaslink captains (that have applied in the last 12 months) have failed the S&P and NOT gone any further with their applications. Checkies, trainers and line captains.
However, MOST FO's have passed the S&P and moved onto the simulator ride. They are doing well on takeup with Jetstar with most getting through.
Now if I was a conspiracy theorist I would suspect that there is some collusioion here between Qantaslink and Jetstar management. I reckon someone has had a word in Jetstars ear something like "we can't afford to lose our experience, please don't take our captains . Cover your arses to make it look like your not discriminating against all group pilots though. Take a few FO's because we can make their replacements pay for their training and it won't cost us that much."
Maybe it's a coincidence and all their captains are just dumbarses.

Nope. I'll stick with the 2nd last paragraph. After all they tried it with Cathay and Dragonair when they found out most of their pilots had applied. Scumbags.
Toluene Diisocyanate is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 08:29
  #23 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As I said my only form of reference is my own group of friends, interesting to see what is going on in the wider world.
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 08:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Four Eastern captains have made it into Jetstar, two of those within the last 12 months.
fromwayback is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 09:00
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 351
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
no epirb, unfortunately not me you are thinking of... though I wish it was...

at least the classic would be a fairly stable place to be right now... dont see too many jetstar boys coughing up the dough to get endorsed on the classic!
OneDotLow is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 09:04
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: |-)
Posts: 30
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does EA and Sunnies (QFlink) handle the situation, where a pilot has failed QF stage one, but was later accepted into QFlink.
They now have or are about to get commands yet they have failed what is now mandatory entry prerequisites.
skurgler is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 09:27
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: C9-H6-N2-O2
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Apologies Fromwayback.
Forgot about Dieter and Craig.
Well its widely known there's an unofficial 'embargo' on Qlink captains preventing them from progressing anywhere in the QF group. Just hard to prove it of course. But the numbers speak for themselves.
Toluene Diisocyanate is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 10:32
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I hear REX pilots are the target, Qantaslink pilots only a few to look fair. Blue shirts from the failed airline have all the say.
golow is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 13:42
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: there
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Skurgler - I thought the Qantaslink and QF mainline (and Jstar) Psych and Skills were the same test ???
Or do they get marked differently ???

The day I was there the Jetstar guys did the same tests (or similar - everyone I think gets a different test) but they didn't do the instrument interpretation, follow the dots, or the 'keep the ball in the middle' test.
slice is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2006, 08:32
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Embargo's on various Flight Crew from other airlines is always hard to prove, but quite often does look obvious.

Toluene, are you saying that there was a number of CX and KA guys trying to get into J* and were held back by an agreement ? They'd be taking a huge pay drop to return to Oz. I wouldn't have thought the two managements were that closely linked or talking.

Even tho the J* guys do the QF P&S it doesn't mean that they are after the same result, (notice I didn't say higher or lower, I think the Psych requirements would be largely different).

Do the J* applicants do the subsequent stages at QF as well, or just some parts. ie do they do a sim with J*, an interview with J* staff and a Medical with QF ?
Agony is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2006, 09:10
  #31 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Even tho the J* guys do the QF P&S it doesn't mean that they are after the same result, (notice I didn't say higher or lower, I think the Psych requirements would be largely different).
Spot on.

The QF mainline assessment is designed to identify potentially successful CADETS....to apply the same testing to highly experienced applicants in their 30s is extremely counterproductive...in fact it's plain stupid.

When I joined PX we were put through 4 days of assessment...the trickcyclists doing the testing told us later over beers that the tests were the same format as QF but tweaked to identify DIFFERENT qualities...those of experienced pilots (average candidate had 6500 hrs with C&Ting experience) who would fit into PX's operational culture.

QF's process is not the be all and end all of pilot selection...even the people who designed it would not suggest that.
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2006, 03:06
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: centre of my universe
Posts: 309
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
The QF mainline assessment is designed to identify potentially successful CADETS....to apply the same testing to highly experienced applicants in their 30s is extremely counterproductive...in fact it's plain stupid.
This statement is plain stupid. The tests are there for a reason and identify attributes the group wants. These sorts of tests are used by thousands of companies and are highly accurate. If you don't get passed this stage it doesn't mean your age and experience isn't good or you are not a good pilot blah blah blah it means you don't fit into the attributes box they are looking for.

As a mate once told me
"If you don't get into Qantas don't take it personally and if you do get into Qantas, Don't take it personally"
Poto is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2006, 04:44
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poto,

A bit harsh. I think what CC was trying to say (sorry to talk for you CC) was that the tests are there for a specific reason. Trying to apply the outcome of the same test for a different need is the key factor here.

You said they are designed to find the right person for the group. I would hazard to guess that the group has several different needs, (QF, QF Cadet, QF regional, J* Dom and J* Int). I reckon that the type of bod they are looking for here would vary, how much I don't know, but it would vary.

I agree with your other comments tho, I think they go without saying. We all have stories about who missed out etc etc
Agony is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2006, 04:53
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: centre of my universe
Posts: 309
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Agony,
wasn't meaning to be harsh to anyone- prob a bad attribute

I do think the p & s test might just not be designed for the 5% odd of QF group crew that are cadets?????

Not an expert and not trying to start a pissing contest with Chucky boy either
Poto is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2006, 06:02
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poto,

No I'm not into contests either, point taken.

I'll place my assertive aggressive back in the closet and try and find that submissive type thing that the trick cyclists like.........

Back to one of my original questions though. Does anybody know what happens after the P&S for a J* applicant?
Agony is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2006, 13:36
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: oz
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you pass the phsycotic test its onto the sim ( rumoured to be the 74-400 now ) and in for an interview to see if your the type of pilot Ansett, sorry, I mean Jetstar, are looking for
cunninglinguist is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2006, 06:38
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SID-OOH-NEE
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best "mate" for the job.

I guess these questions remain unanswered;

Why is the "mates" system still being used to choose e.g. "a middle aged lush who has not flown for a few years" over "current Airbus rated/ experienced pilots" for stage one assessment?

Why isn't everyone required to do stage one?

Equal opportunity or selective nepotism.
UNOME is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2006, 07:10
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Skylab
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UNOME, maybe it's got something to do with the fact that these guys could possibly "raise" the standard of JQ?... be interesting to see if the top 30 guys on the JQ seniority list come through the A320 type rating in one peice.

The way I see it is that there are 3 groups in JQ........ Impulse, ex Ansett guys and guys off the street....be nice to see the first group of turkeys sorted out by the second group of guys!!!
Pete Conrad is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2006, 07:22
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: expat@large
Age: 55
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Dribble

Hey Chimbu, take this towel mate and whipe that excess salivation off your strides. Sheesh, that was the verbal equivalent of watching a man with skooby-snacks in his shoes walking through a gaggle of month-old beagles!

That's exactly how the psyche-test works. It's a character profile. Not a "who's a good pilot" profile. The Rat's, (and indeed, anyone's) use of these things is to assess a type of person.
I could be cynical, orright then, I will, and say the Q seem to think a pilot is born, not made, and what the heck IS the difference between one pilot and the next??
Oh, dear, look at little Johnnie's psyche results! Can't possibly have him in the 402 in Sydney, send him to Melb. on the PA31!!
But in order to sort-out large numbers of Cadet wanna-be's it seems a method as good as any other for thinning the ranks.
5% of the group?? Proto I think maybe you've been there only a few months. Psyche testing in current form was first used around '99 -2000, and only the mainline hopefuls got to do it.
Crossbleed is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2006, 08:39
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 1/12 Lord ST Botany ;)
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey pete, the top 30 have all now been checked to line and some of them now training captains. Your agression at a bunch of people you know very little about is childish at best and show's you obviously have some big issue's you need to talk about to someone. Pete, listen carefully, YOU CANT BE ANGRY AT PEOPLE FOR THIS LONG. ITS NOT HEALTHY AND NOT WORTH IT. LIVE AND LET LIVE!!!!!
Rostov is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.