Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

QF 744 doing circle work over Penty?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF 744 doing circle work over Penty?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 03:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Big V
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question QF 744 doing circle work over Penty?

I live in Greensborough just north of the Penty Locator (Melbourne) and at 1345 EST I couldn't not notice a QF 744 with a large amount of flap and its gear extended doing visual orbits at round 2500-3500 feet. The amount of thrust required to maintain altitude sounded very expensive!

Does anybody know what up with that?

Could it have something to do with the Grand Prix?

In wait with interest

Leatherdog
Leatherdog is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 04:24
  #2 (permalink)  
When you live....
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 0.0221 DME Keyboard
Posts: 984
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Yep, grand prix - did flyovers about 10mins before the race started.

UTR
UnderneathTheRadar is online now  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 05:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nasaltown
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The question that has to be asked, when Dixon is counting the number of crumbs wasted on each bread roll, is
WHY?

A lead car sponsored by QANTAS would have achieved more, and cost less.

Who was on board for that wasteful little junket?
Ronnie Honker is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 05:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 551
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Ronnie Honker
A lead car sponsored by QANTAS would have achieved more, and cost less.
You're kidding right?
How much to tool around a 747 for 30min?
Compared to the telephone number figure you'd need to get QANTAS down the side of a Renault, Maclaren or Ferrari.

Added to that is it's all out of the marketing budget, not operational. You can be dead broke on the brink of bankruptcy and the marketing tools still get the caviar and champagne and megabucks for some stupid ad camapaign.
Kiwiconehead is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 07:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nasaltown
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"A lead car "...a pole car.

How much to tool around a 747 for 30min?
How much indeed?!
They would have burned close to 8 or 10 tonnes (8,000 to 10,000 kgs) of gas for a start, add to that air nav charges, actual aircraft operating time -for a 30 minute flight, add 15 minutes either end for taxi time (so total operating time is now at least 1 hour).

It's a no brainer in my opinion.
Dixon is frivilous with the money when HE wants to be, putting his claims of wanting to run as efficiently as possible in a wastebasket.
This will be added to QANTAS' other debts, to prove that it is not being as efficiently run as Jet*.
Ronnie Honker is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 07:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Future
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deep pockets, short arms. The tinny b@stard is probably writing it off on tax as a delivery flight to the "new" maintenance base in Avalon!
Elroy Jettson is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 07:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dad's Bag
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By no means defending gd, but I have just watched the GP in HK and the plane did get a fair bit of airtime on the Star Sports coverage. So whilst it probably cost a lot of money, the huge international exposure gained would far outweigh it. Seems like pretty good sense to me.
Blown Seal is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 07:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How low was the flyby? I'll bet there wasn't a CASA dispensation to break 1000' (probably didn't get that low anyway)
*Lancer* is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 07:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 551
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Elroy Jettson
The tinny b@stard is probably writing it off on tax as a delivery flight to the "new" maintenance base in Avalon!
No, it will be part of the marketing budget approved last year.

You guys really don't have a clue do you. Marketing money is inviolate, there is always money for advertising or promotion, no matter what penny pinching is going on elsewhere, even Jetstar advertise.

"A lead car "...a pole car.
F1 safety cars don't carry sponsorship, just the F1 logo.

And as an idea of the money we are talking, it cost Emirates around US$20-25 million to get "Fly Emirates" on Kimi and Juan Pablo's rear wings for this year.

Still think tooling a 747 around for 30min is expensive?
Kiwiconehead is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 07:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: cloud9
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't beleive some of you fellow aviators think this is a waste of money.

This is BASIC business sense.... smart advertising at low cost! .. and yes it will be a tax deduction, but that's almost irrelevant. Every person at the Grand Prix would have seen that Qantas Logo, along with most of Melbourne, and most of the world........ Millions and Millions of people. What AWESOME advertising and brand recognition.

Now go find out how much the one hour of operating a very light 747 is, then ring up for prime advertising during the Grand Prix!!! Bloody great move, hence why they keep doing it.

You few fellow Pilots that think no further than your own little world of WIIFM, need to get in the real world.

Start your own business, then never advertise, to keep your employees happy, then see how you do!

And I'm not management, and I do think most fellow Pilots are being treated like crap, but this is just a no brainer!
evyjet is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 08:39
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Well said evyjet.
Habster is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 09:25
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunnunda & Godzone
Age: 74
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks evyjet.

C'mon folks, prime time world wide TV audience, several billion revheads, all with a bit of money for travel.

Conservatively several millions of free exposure. As the man said a no brainer.

Murray Walker said the Melbourne GP is the best and has the most non F1 entertainment of all the GPs. Mostly they are just the race, period.

Mon son is going to Europe next month will be near Monaco when its on there, he's going with his mate, cost AUD $850 ea. for a grandstand seat near the exit of the tunnel, they get ferried to and from. Have to stay in Nice and commute no biggy but when the GP is on so are the prices for accom etc. And they are not the most expensive seats and there is only the race. $566ph for the entertainment.
Woomera is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 09:53
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Keeping The Enema Bandit in line
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They should have had the F18 and Roulettes formate on it. Now that would be a sight!
Enema Bandit's Dad is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 10:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nasaltown
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it was such a brilliant marketing coup, then why didn't we see Jet*, Virgin Blue, Australian, and Emirates circling the place as well?

Too easy.

Because regardless of what Woomera's son pays for a ticket to enter Monaco. he'll still look for the CHEAPEST deal on the net to fly him there.
Unless he's using Dad's FF points (or his own).

A needless waste of shareholders' money - a banner tow with QANTAS tagged behind would have achieved the same exposure for 1/50th of the price!
Ronnie Honker is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 10:31
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Future
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hate to question the moderator, but Woomera, do you honestly think M Walker thinks Melbourne is the best? He used to say that about Adelaide, when he used to commentate at Brands Hatch, do you think he used to say, "This is nice, but not a patch on Melbourne!"

This grand prix in (insert current location) is obviously the best on the circuit!"

Cmon! "Nobody rocks like Springfield!"
Elroy Jettson is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 10:32
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Next to Bay 8
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
please...

a banner tow with QANTAS tagged behind would have achieved the same exposure for 1/50th of the price!
Yeah, and I'm sure it would have had the same effect. Everybody around the world watching a bugsmasher pulling a banner behind it. PaaaLease!!! Now a QF 744 towing a banner that reads "Let's fly Jetstar"... that'd get some looks!
OhForSure is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 10:41
  #17 (permalink)  
king oath
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Evyjet is spot on re advertising budget and tax deductions.

Also if its the same 747 parked at the domestic terminal later in the arvo it probably did a syd-mel in the morning loaded with petrol heads coming down for the day followed by a return to syd late arvo with same petrol heads aboard.

Nothing turns heads more than wall to wall, block of flats, 747 at 1500ft over the suburbs of Melbourne showing the corporate flag. And the taxpayers are refunding 30 cents in the dollar corporate tax rate. Ripper maaaaaate!
 
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 11:29
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nasaltown
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing turns heads more than wall to wall, block of flats, 747 at 1500ft over the suburbs of Melbourne showing the corporate flag. And the taxpayers are refunding 30 cents in the dollar corporate tax rate. Ripper maaaaaate!
And achieves what? Other than turned heads.

My guess is the effect on sales of QANTAS, achieved by this flyover is a big ZER0

it probably did a syd-mel in the morning loaded with petrol heads coming down for the day followed by a return to syd late arvo with same petrol heads aboard.
Only if they couldn't get cheaper fares.
After all, isn't THAT why Dixon is trying to screw everyone?
If flying Jumbos over public events is likely to have a marked effect on sales, why not recommend THAT to God, in place of his slash and burn policies.

More than likely though, it's BECAUSE of these obscenely flagrant, unaccountable, and wilful wastes of money, such as today's flyover, that QANTAS is in the position Darth says it is, and why QF staff are being subjected to threats of replacement by cheap o/s labour.

"Nero fiddles, while Rome burns"
Ronnie Honker is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 12:08
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MEL
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'INTERNATIONAL EXPOSURE". More people would watch the GP in Europe (even in the middle of the night) than our total population.

Sure it cost a s#*tload but not a patch on the $25+ Million Emirates spent.
UnusualAttitudes is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2006, 13:09
  #20 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Look what advertising on the cars did for OzJet...I'd stick with a flyover.
Buster Hyman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.