Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Upgrade to pave way for more 747 flights

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Upgrade to pave way for more 747 flights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Feb 2006, 01:26
  #1 (permalink)  

Evertonian
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,495
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Upgrade to pave way for more 747 flights

Monday February 27, 12:48 PM

The Canberra International Airport will soon be open to frequent 747 flights with the Federal Government announcing a multi-million dollar upgrade of its main runway.

The airport has a limit on the number of large flights it can accommodate because of the strength of its main runway.

Federal Transport Minister Warren Truss says the Government will spend $28 million to enable the runway to take heavier aircraft.

"There will be quite a number of these aircraft coming into Australia, they're required here for operational purposes, with visiting dignitaries and their entourages or for military purposes," he said.

The airport's Stephen Byron says the upgrade also coincides with a plan to lengthen the runway.

"We believe that will assist us in terms of the development of new routes into and out of Canberra," he said.

The work will be carried out at night and is expected to be ready in time for the 2007 APEC meeting.

BBJ's not big enough huh?
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 01:42
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
.. did they mention anything about bulldozing the hills which will be the limiting factor for RTOW ?
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 02:12
  #3 (permalink)  

Evertonian
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,495
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Nah, but I'm sure we could get something done to the airspace to alleviate the problem!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 02:36
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Let me guess, 747 executive jets for John Howard? Maybe he could buy a second hand "Airforce One?". Pardon me, my cynicism is showing again.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 02:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would he want to buy a callsign SunFish?
Don't knock this - the airport have got a real win here and the Gvmt have paid for it Snowie is popping the champers as we speak!
CIA Stooge is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 04:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Buster Hyman
Monday February 27, 12:48 PM
The Canberra International Airport will soon be open to frequent 747 flights with the Federal Government announcing a multi-million dollar upgrade of its main runway.

Good.
The mob I fly for use Canberra as a technical alternate. It'd be nice if could really use it though, as when we really need a practical alternate we have to use either MEL or BNE.
And some of the turkeys I work with can't understand what a tech alternate is anyway.
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 05:21
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
So it's a good move then from the point of view of using it as an alternate, and not for LJH's new executive jet? I have once more demonstrated my complete lack of aviational nous.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 06:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 57
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And taxiway strengthening too? Or the good old Aussie el cheapo turning node and backtrack?
Like This - Do That is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 09:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hell...where angels ride harleys
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
I have once more demonstrated my complete lack of aviational nous.
yes, you have. seems to be more and more of an occurrance recently.

Isn't CB a privately owned airport ?
chief wiggum is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 09:08
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So... confirm that the government is paying for the runway lengthening, but Canberra Airport Limited will pocket all the landing and handling charges for the increased weight traffic? This seems like a great deal for a private company....

In my limited dealing with operations at Canberra, I know the RAAF was having kittens with the landing and parking charges being imposed. The area we were using had previously been RAAF Fairbairn's tarmac, and was transferred to Canberra Airport for nil charge. Like good capitalists, they were making a killing renting it back. The result: no more high speed taxi services.
Ex Douglas Driver is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 21:39
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Driver - the airport is paying for the lengthening - ie the extension to the south. Yesterdays announcement related to the strenghthening which is being paid for by the government - ie building extra depth on the runway.
CIA Stooge is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 21:51
  #12 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Problem with extending to the south is that the saddle to the north is still going to present a significant problem unless the extension is significant and the use of overspeed schedules becomes the norm.
john_tullamarine is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.