Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Virgin returns after smelly take-off

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Virgin returns after smelly take-off

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2005, 08:27
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: brisbane,qld,australia
Posts: 276
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Time for a little lightening up?

This reminds me of an incident years ago when I used to occupy the RH seat of an AN DC9.

Had flown the early morning flt SYD-ADL after the a/c had overnighted at Sydney.

On arrival in ADL after the pax had disembarked the Senior came into the cockpit and adv there was a bad smell in the fwd cabin near the door.

Checked it out and sure enough it smelt like something died.

Engineers were summoned and quickly found a dead cat in the front stairwell. Seems that during the previous night one of the many stray cats that made the maint hangar home found a nice warm spot in the stairwell and was nice and comfy until someone retracted the fwd stairs!

Apparently all the chains n sprockets made quite a mess.

I had 2 occasions when this happened. The second time I got a strange look from the Senior when in reply to her query re a bad smell I casually remarked it was probably a dead cat!!

Emeritus
emeritus is online now  
Old 10th Nov 2005, 11:11
  #22 (permalink)  

Evertonian
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Good for you jetblues! You actually fly it at 41,000ft eh? No Autopilot for you guys huh?

PC Aviator? Hardly, I'm more into FPS & RTS if you don't mind.

Anyway, what happened to the cheery face of DJ? I thought you guys didn't take yourselves too seriously? You know, casual attire, no tie...(thank Christ I didn't mention the epaulettes!)

By all means, have a crack at me when it's worthwhile, but geez, I haven't even tried a wind up yet.

Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2005, 11:50
  #23 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Angel

Never mind Buster.....the rest of us know that you have a wit- well, half of one anyway!
Keg is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2005, 20:23
  #24 (permalink)  

Evertonian
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
That's more like it Keg! Half will do me any day of the week!

PS. I followed a big 4WD the other day with personalised plates reading: KEG...Please, telll me it wasn't you?
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2005, 22:05
  #25 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
I've always worked on the theory that being a half wit was better than no wit at all!

I can't afford a 'big 4WD' Buster and even if I could, I certainly wouldn't bother with 'Keg' number plates! I may be proud of who I am but I'm not an idiot!
Keg is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2005, 22:11
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nasaltown
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This smells more like the cost of inexperience - no reports of smoke (or fire), or abnormal engine indication.
"Returned shortly after take-off", makes one suspect a bird strike - the stench is nothing at all like KFC.
Your comments may be funny unless YOU were the Captain that had to make a quick decision.
One thing you learn, as the hours build, is that quick decisions often lead you in the wrong direction.
Very quickly.
Ronnie Honker is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 04:03
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flew this aircraft after its return...good crew decision to return for the landing. When I recieved the facts from the engineer who was working on the problem would have made same decision. Can not be bothered to type out the problem but well done to a good decision by the crew. Ronnie ..." more is lost by indecision than wrong decision ".
Bailey's Dad is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 04:44
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bailey thanks for the excellent post, saves me the effort saying the same thing. Some comments on this thread show a severe lack of either experience or understanding.

Ronnie, I have lots of hours on lots of jets too.

Buster, I will not waste my time commenting on your rubbish any further.

Anyway ......
jetblues is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 05:08
  #29 (permalink)  

Evertonian
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Thank Gawd for that JB!

I'm starting to come round to the idea of the 732's...those NG's sound dangerous!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 05:18
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nasaltown
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Just the very abbreviated version will do Bailey's Dad.

I suspect fowl play

If it's something more serious than a birdstrike that caused the NG to return, then I'm certain there are other operators of the same type elsewhere who'd be interested to hear the reason for the
good crew decision to return for the landing.
Ronnie Honker is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 06:12
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,560
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Things are crook in Tullarook when Buster gets involved in serious posts!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 08:47
  #32 (permalink)  

Evertonian
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Yes, my thread's been hijacked by the Paragons of Virtue!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 10:09
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PH 298/7.4DME
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear me,

If it wasn't for the prudent actions of the crew the outcome could have been a lot worse. At least, because of that we can laugh about it.

The humour involved is NOT directed at any company or decision on the part of the crew involved, as far as the impressions I get go.

Take a joke!

I have found this thread rather amusing, in a few ways.


520.
Continental-520 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 10:32
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nasaltown
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From several of the responses here - especially that of Continental-520 - this "incident" sounds as though it was indeed a lot more serious than just another birdstrike.
the outcome could have been a lot worse.
You guys have REALLY whet my appetite now to try to find out what this apparently near disastrous incident, that caused a return shortly after take-off.

Undoubtedly Boeing must be in on it, being as serious as it apparently was.
You can bet the media will now also start digging deeper (yes, they DO read pprune).

"...good crew decision to return for the landing. When I recieved the facts from the engineer who was working on the problem would have made same decision."

"Bailey thanks for the excellent post, saves me the effort saying the same thing.
" (see above post)

"If it wasn't for the prudent actions of the crew the outcome could have been a lot worse.

What problem do VB 737NG's have?

....or is it a simple case of some people being unwilling to admit that it just a case of snafu?
Ronnie Honker is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 10:39
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had an extended layover in Tampa a year or two ago. The other pilot and I hit the bars, ate ethnic food and had a good time. Ended up flying back empty, 100 miles out started teasing each other about last nights dinner. 150 miles out realised each of us were claiming innocence, all indications normal, getting ready to turn back. Two minutes later smoke starts filling the passenger compartment. On finals flames were visable.
No real damage done, turned out someone had used the wrong cover tape on some obscure heat duct pipe 7 years before that chose that moment to fail. I'm glad we had a very restricted climb, and I'm very glad we chose to go back when we did.

Any pilot on here questioning the pilots decision to turn back is an idiot. Right or wrong, don't you want that particular ace up your sleeve when the proverbial hits the fan?
NZLeardriver is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 11:37
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well there you go Ronnie,

Undoubtedly Boeing must be in on it, being as serious as it apparently was. You can bet the media will now also start digging deeper (yes, they DO read pprune).
I guess I wont need to give you information as Boeing will provide a FCOM Bulletin. Oh ,yes the media will also probably provide you with a " Bulletin " as they do read pprune.
What you need to do is make a Decision ( since you have alot of hours ) on which one to absorb. Now thats got to be a quick decision if you ask me.

In all seriousness, your engineers ( with Boeing certs. ) would give you the good "grease" on what happened on that ...... near disatrous flight ( Your Quote ).

PS. Now I know where the Media exagggerate there aviation stories .... they just read yours and plagiarize your well chosen words !
Bailey's Dad is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 14:35
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: ---
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I work in the cabin for the other major player in the Oz aviation industry and having experienced the biggest thing we're trained for, i say whole heartedly, even though i'm not a fan of DJ, the Captain absolutely made the correct decision.

Oz
OZcabincrew is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2005, 22:45
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nasaltown
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any pilot on here questioning the pilots decision to turn back is an idiot. Right or wrong, don't you want that particular ace up your sleeve when the proverbial hits the fan?
Harsh words there Lear driver. Because you happened to have experienced something ONCE that might have threatened the safety of your flight, that doesn't mean that EVERY time there's a "strange smell" noticed by the crew they should immediately land.
Of course I will almost always have that "ace up my sleeve" - but there will also be reasons that do NOT necessitate a return to land. A bird strike, with no evident damage is one of those.

No-one has yet posted the cause of the odour that caused this VB crew to decide to return.
But all is not lost, I see we now have cabin crew from other companies assuring us that "the Captain absolutely made the correct decision."
Ronnie Honker is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2005, 00:06
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Labuan
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Swissair MD11 over Canada ignored strange cockpit odours for way too long with rather disastrous results...

Armchair aviators can speculate, and stipulate, and vascillate all they want - you weren't there, you don't know. How can you evaluate a judgement call if you were not there?

I 'spose they could have done a Deathstar and pressed-on...

Or maybe it was just Buster Hyman's rancid halitosis...

MkVIII is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2005, 00:55
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nasaltown
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stop dodging the bullets and answer the question, please

WHAT was the cause of this "strange odour" that caused this Virgin Blue 737NG to return?
Ronnie Honker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.