Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Management Bonuses

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st May 2005, 07:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: somewhere in Australia
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas Management Bonuses

I would like to see Qantas Management Bonuses paid about 5 years after the year they are earned, so that a review of decisions made and the effect they have had on the business can be made, this might put an end to short sighted decisions that end up costing a fortune, anyone agree??
spinout is offline  
Old 21st May 2005, 08:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oztraya
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd like to see if the "great Qantaslink let's not pay everyone for a week" scam, which tipped probably $500k straight on the bottom line of the company, triggered any bonuses for any QFlink executives.

Or would I just be being cynical
Pimp Daddy is offline  
Old 21st May 2005, 21:43
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: somewhere in Australia
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cynical you never…..

You know it was only done to bring Eastern in line with Sunstate… and if the EBA for Eastern is delayed another month (one year) they will be able to negotiate a Eastern and Sunstate read Qantaslink EBA…

Just how many short sighted cost cutting decisions have been made only to end up costing more?
spinout is offline  
Old 21st May 2005, 22:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how about basing the bonus on share performance!

5 yrs of record profits!

and the share price hasnt moved! somethings wrong!
Ultralights is offline  
Old 23rd May 2005, 10:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Moon
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great in theory Ultralights, but those big American corporate collapses (e.g. enron, mci worldcom) showed that fat bonuses related to the share price don't really work as all that happens is the fat-cats lie (in the upward direction of course!) about the bottom line, share price goes up, everyone happy, fat-cats sell bonus shares before inevitable collapse, transfer assets to wife and kids and spend five years in court saying they "are just the CEO, we don't have any knowledge of accounting..." before wearing oxygen masks in the courtroom and claiming they have only "months to live"...
Fatter Bastard is offline  
Old 24th May 2005, 05:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
Actually Spinout you are getting closer to the truth. Best practice now is for an audit of the company's capability, assets, market share and performance BEFORE a CEO is appointed and AFTER he leaves. If the business has been raped to produce false returns, the bonus vanishes.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 24th May 2005, 06:09
  #7 (permalink)  
ZIP TY
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Danger


Any truth that the current freeze's on projects,training,etc. are Geoff Dioxon cooking the books and getting ready to short true with his fat bounse's?
 
Old 24th May 2005, 06:43
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: somewhere in Australia
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ZIP TY

you are correct....
spinout is offline  
Old 24th May 2005, 07:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not with his spelling though " Shoot Thru." maybe???
hangar 9 is offline  
Old 24th May 2005, 08:45
  #10 (permalink)  
ZIP TY
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hangar 9, you are correct.
Its a bit difficult to watch the screen and over your shoulder at the same time. There a Judes's about.
 
Old 10th Jun 2005, 13:36
  #11 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Exclamation

We probably mostly all agree on this - paying a performance PROVEN salary.
And as Geoff has shown that he doesn't have the skills to compete with his Asian contemporaries (in Singapore), who are undoubtedly (under)paid far, far less than Basic + $6 million that Geoff demands, surely the highest income earning management staff, who are DIRECTLY responsible for the well-being (shareholder and employee) of the Company, should be on a performance based wage.

I mean, if they're THAT good, there't won't be a problem proving it!
Kaptin M is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.