Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Shame Qantas Shame

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Feb 2005, 01:26
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Suggestions?

Lots of rhetoric,observations and criticisms.
How about some positive suggestions?
Captain.Q is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 01:33
  #22 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lightbulb

The quantities I'm talking about would be going (in and) out in TRUCKS, schnauzer, not bags.

A positive suggestion, Captain Q - start with a full check of catering...that the stuff that is being ordered and paid for, is actually being delivered, first to QANTAS, and then to the aircraft.
Use independent investigators - if theft is going on, on a large scale then there is likely to be a number of people involved.

IF all of that checks out okay, then obviously the quantities being supplied are INSUFFICIENT!
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 01:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Where people don't care
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Executive buy-up?

Maybe the bar shortages were the result of a buy-up by Qantas executive staff. A very jealously guarded perk not known by many is that enjoyed by all Executive staff that allows them to buy wine, liqour and beer (all classes) from catering at very discounted prices.. There is no limit to their avarice..
Don Esson is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 02:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Out there somewhere
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is always easier to blame someone else, I would welcome an investigation then I and others could tell all.

Why is one flight good for pax's and another not? The one thing that changes is the crew, and unfortunately for those who want to do the right thing, those who don't, drag us all down.
socks is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 02:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: NSW,Australia
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Socks"
You are a classic example of the "instant expert"
Never been there and Never done it.
Your ignorance is only surpassed by your malicious arrogance!
capt.cynical is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 02:23
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Out there somewhere
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What makes you think I am not speaking from first hand knowledge, and don't push me to reveal more.
socks is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 02:24
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
DEFCON 4

From the SQ website re flight attendant's salaries:
salary and allowances of about S$3,500 a month
This works out to be roughly A$33,600 per annum pre tax INCLUDING ALLOWANCES. Most QF F/A's would be at least 30% up on that - heading up to comfortably double for a F/A -even triple for a senior CSM or Line Manager. Some of your senior colleagues (beyond 2000 trip for eg.) would come close to that in allowances alone.

The point you blindingly miss is that QF Flight Attendants are paid more than any other Asian flight attendants you care to mention. Convert numbers into any common currency and I guarantee it would cost TG or SQ less in wages to put 20 crew on a 747 than it costs QF to put 14 on there.

Salaries are in line with the cost of living in Australia, I grant you. However, QF is competing against airlines with a much lower cost base. GD can see this is a place where he can cut costs and will do so ruthlessly. Simply saying "We're not overpaid" is no defense against that. It's time for you, collectively, to pull your heads out of the sand and recognise what you're up against.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 02:26
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Land Down Under
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Socks/Direct any where

Socks Ol' Buddy:Put Up or Shutup!

Direct anywhere: How much does the CEO of SQ earn?
How much does an SQ Captain Earn?

Last edited by argusmoon; 24th Feb 2005 at 02:49.
argusmoon is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 02:56
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bundeena(AUSTRALIA)
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blame Game

So there you have it folks QF woes are all down to the Cabin Crew,the whole 7,000 of them ALL lazy,ALL Rude,ALL overpaid.Seems there is something wrong with the interview process and there has been since 1965.Wow!
captainrats is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 03:40
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
Geeze, I give up.

Argusmoon, no idea about the CEO but an SQ Captain of similar age and experience will earn MORE than a QF Captain.

captainrats, read my first post. I NEVER said QF F/As were to blame for the airline's woes. Nor did I say they were all lazy, all rude, all shonks all(insert insult here). I simply said that QF F/As cost more than their counterparts and this is perhaps part of the reason why there are fewer of them per aircraft.

DEFCON 4 said no, not true when some simple web based research proves yes, it IS true.

If other airlines staff are cheaper that will give them a competitive advantage, plain and simple. No more to say....
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 03:56
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just because you have a "bad" job, doesn't mean you have to do it badly. There IS no excuse for rudeness to the people paying your wages. If your not happy, leave.
NAMD is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 04:23
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
Sorry Schnauzer, I meant "Qantas Management"not the coal face staff. To paraphrase the old army saying there are no bad staff, only bad managers. I get upset reading posts from people who are trying to do a good job but stuck without the resources to do it.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 04:28
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF aircraft are short on supplies because catering stock is purposely ordered at ~5-10% less than the expected load. I guess someone in management thought that this would contribute nicely to the $1.5 BILLION dollars that is the goal of the current cost cutting regime - however, all it seems to do get customers and staff offside.

As such, it's a bit of a stretch to blame the cabin crew if they run out of food/supplies/extras - they were probably never there in the first place...
Johhny Utah is online now  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 04:39
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
Let me give you a story about work practices.

Once upon a time the Ansett LAME's got fed up. They were putting in their eight hours, then getting overtime every day of the week and then some.

"Enough!" One of them said, "all we are working overtime for is the bloody tax office!" . "we can get the same coverage by working twelve hour shifts. Don't pay us overtime, but instead we want a three day weekend. The manhours we supply you will be exactly the same. You will not pay us quite as much money, but we don't care, we get to see our kids grow up".

Sunfish did the numbers and these guys were right. For a small financial sacrifice they got a three day weekend - the airline paid less overtime - everybody won - except the tax office.

Sunfish had the temerity to mention this little idea to the powers that be and was promptly told that the Bosses' little Silver Haired mate was not going to countenance anyone breaking the sacrosanct eight hour day.

There ARE ways for QF to compete AND keep its costs down without antagonizing its staff.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 04:41
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've said it before on other threads, I'll say it again now.

If anybody has a bad experience on QF, write a letter and let QF management know about it!! Tell them that you are not happy and will change companies if they do not improve the catering/meals/wine/IFE (whatever).

Maybe then they (management) will get the message that a reputation does not have a dollar value but costs a lot to reclaim.

BITCHING ON THIS FORUM WILL ACHIEVE NOTHING
Three Bars is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 05:43
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dununda
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Comparisons

SQ get paid monthly QF crew get paid hourly..bit hard to draw a comparison.You will always get better service when you have more people/crew.When you end up apologizing for circumstances beyond your control,and you do it constantly it starts to grind you down.So in order to maintain your sanity you lower your expectations of the service you would like to give.The whole scenario becomes self perpetuating.
Now my close personal friend "socks" will no doubt take issue with this.When his a/c breaks down he gets off and goes to a hotel>Doesn't have contact with pax at all.If he explains at all it is anonymously.No face to face confrontation for him.....let the minions do it.There are regulations in place to govern his world.Not so for the lowly Cabin Crew.They are here to serve him and satisfy his needs.He is a bit of a Dinosaur.Oh I forgot, he is also homophobic.Charming guy really.
surfside6 is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 06:13
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Asia
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Three Bars

At least bitching on this forum elicits a response now and again!

Writing to QF management is a waste of time and the paper it is written on. I have never once got a response so gave up the practise some time ago and have stuck with my resolution to not use QF unless the only alternative is a bicycle.
Traffic is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 06:44
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if the catering company would be ripping off QF if it was still owned by QF?

if that be the case, then the "Savings" made by outsourcing catering have well and truly been lost in lost revenue, lost brand credibility, lost manhours due to fed up staff working with perpetual shortages reulting in a loss of repeat cutomers.

smart business move.
Ultralights is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 19:54
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
Didn't they make the fence near catering high enough? I thought all this supply business was fixed years ago??
Sunfish is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2005, 20:39
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Three bars, if you get bad service in a restaurant do you write to the management, or do you go to another restaurant next time?

It's not up to the customers, it's up to the managers,

Surfside... carrying that chip around must be doing wonders for your back.
The_Cutest_of_Borg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.