Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Is CASA aware?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Feb 2005, 00:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bundeena(AUSTRALIA)
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is CASA aware?

Due to the accelerated leave programme in place at QANTAS aircraft are leaving Sydney devoid of management flight attendants.This means that no one has access to the physicians kit or defibrillator.In some cases this has meant that some mandatory safety p.a s have not been made.
Safety of passengers again appears to come second at Qantas.Second to Dixon's bonuses and cost cutting.
SOMEONE NEEDS TO STOP THIS MAN BEFORE HE HURTS SOMEBODY!

Last edited by captainrats; 21st Feb 2005 at 05:04.
captainrats is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 02:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Down under land
Posts: 307
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If the skipper is aware that a demo is not able to be performed etc, me thinks he would be obligated to remain at the gate right?

Aren't defibs and doc kits a company 'option' - ie not mandated by regulation?... Don't imagine CASA would be concerned, however the consciences of the other crew members should be.
Watchdog is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 05:02
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bundeena(AUSTRALIA)
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mandated

I believe they are mandated.The only person(s) able to access these items are the onboard mangers.These aircraft have been leaving without even the Captain having keys to access them should they be required.Someone has obviously done the risk analysis regarding litigation(?)
captainrats is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 06:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Aus
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

F/A's operating as CSM's are normally given a set of keys, and a manual with the P.A's from the Admin Office staff. However if more than one flt there may not be any "spares" for them. It happens at both Shorthaul and Longhaul, and has done for a long time but is especially common at the moment.
Bundy is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 07:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HEAVEN
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
captainrats,

I think you are mistaken, they are not mandatory. If they were how can they be allowed to depart with a flat battery, which sometimes happens.

And rumour has it that British Airways are changing all there packs following a check that revealed they were pretty well all flat.

It is nice to have extra that some airlines offer and yes Qantas were the pioneers, but that was yesterday.
Orville is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 09:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Defibrillators

My understanding is that this equipment is checked by the CSM before departure.To my knowledge and after questioning several onboard managers,I am assured they are never flat.The issue here however appears to be access.If aircraft are leaving with no keys and no crew trained in their use...then I would suggest you have a problem.If the crew depart Sydney with no keys and no access, for a 10 day trip they are handling approximately 1200 passengers(4 Sectors).If this is an LHR pattern any one of 30% of the pax may(and I emphasize may)need this equipment.If for example you travel to/from the States and have a passenger that has a cardiac episode and this equipment is not available expect to have your testicles put in a blender.Metaphorically speaking of course.
There appears to be no system/protocol inplace for this contingency.Remember the swiss cheese principle...this a perfect example.
I have contacted CASA, for clarification, regarding this matter.
www.casa.gov.au

Last edited by Captain.Q; 21st Feb 2005 at 10:39.
Captain.Q is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 09:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or a pax having an `event' and the Dr/nurse in the plane not able to get to the kit to treat them...
farqueue is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 09:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There should be a set of keys onboard every QF jet. You just have to know where to look.
blueloo is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 09:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blueloo..should be?

The operative two words here are :"should be".That does not mean: "will be".
I rang the boys and girls behind the service desk on QCC1.... and they are not aware of them being on any aircraft.
Captain.Q is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 09:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HEAVEN
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Captain Q

Let me clear up your understanding.

http://rrp.casa.gov.au/nprm/nprm0211osB.pdf


Air Transport Operations – Large
Aeroplanes – CASR Part 121A
121A.055 Information on emergency and survival equipment carried
(1) An operator must ensure that it keeps available, for immediate communication
to rescue coordination centres, information on the emergency and survival
equipment carried on board each of its aeroplanes.
(2) The information must include, as applicable, the number, colour and type of
life-rafts and pyrotechnics, details of emergency medical supplies, water
supplies and the type and frequencies of emergency portable radio equipment.


Appendix 1 to regulation 121A.1005 (Initial training)

Medical aspects and first aid

(6) An operator must ensure that medical and first aid training includes instruction
in:
(a) first aid and the use of first-aid kits; and
(b) the operator’s policy concerning the use of any specialist emergency
medical equipment carried (for example, auto-defibrillators); and
(c) first aid associated with survival training and appropriate hygiene; and
(d) the physiological effects of flying, with particular emphasis

So Qantas can decide when, where and who uses the equipment on board as it is clearly not mandatory.

And the CSM only checks the fitment of the defibulator not its battery.
Orville is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 09:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it may have changed since the airbus and fleet wide adoption of this particular thing.... Keys used to be contained in it, but I suspect not now.
blueloo is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 10:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Orville ..Thank You

Orville thank you for your fine work.
I will however reiterate that my primary concern is access to this equipment and its use.As you rightly point out this is at the discretion of the Airline.If there are no operators(the onboard managers are the only crew trained)and there are no keys....well if there is an episode could there then be a case for criminal negligence if indeed the passenger dies?
This discussion(for me) is an information gathering exercise so that should an incident arise I am aware of the possible circumstances/outcomes.

Last edited by Captain.Q; 21st Feb 2005 at 10:45.
Captain.Q is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 23:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HEAVEN
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Captain Q.

I acknowledge your thirst for information, and to further assist you I can offer an insight into the Minimum Equipment LIst (MEL's) that the pilot uses to determine the a/c serviceability legally.

MEL 25-64-2 ..... Installed ..... Required

1. First aid kit ........4 .......... 3
2. Physicians Kit ..... 1 ......... 0
3. Defibrillator ...... 1 ......... 0

From what you can see a minimum of three first aid kits are mandatory, however only one kit is required to have been unused, the other two can have been used and not be full.

Legally I also recall from my training in first aid that we were told that there has never been a legal precedence set to prosecute someone for not offering medical assistance, whether trained or untrained.

As a first aider you would have been trained to keep the vitals going of any patient until appropriate medical help arrives, and I would suggest that this would still be the case with or without a defibrillator.

Good luck in your quest.
Orville is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2005, 18:04
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Zer Gut Ya?
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ummmm, Jetlager? With respect, this ain't the place to be talking about restraint equipment...
schnauzer is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2005, 01:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,886
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
So why mention it again?
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2005, 02:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Schnauser,
point taken and post deleted.
The concerns however remain the same.
jettlager is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.