Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Should SQ be granted "open skies" to the Australian market

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific
View Poll Results: Should SQ be granted "open skies" to the Australian market
Yes
110
46.22%
No
122
51.26%
Undecided
6
2.52%
Voters: 238. This poll is closed

Should SQ be granted "open skies" to the Australian market

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Mar 2005, 00:25
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
answer has to be NO.

If it is that importanat to them then they will help Australian carriers obtain more flights thru Singapore to European destinations, one for one.
Redstone is offline  
Old 9th May 2005, 11:05
  #62 (permalink)  
Props are for boats!
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: An Asian Hub
Age: 56
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It looks like Emirates want oart of the action aswell. If they get in aswell as SQ then Maybe Branson will want a chunk with Virgin Atlantic changing to say "Virgin Pacific?"

I havent had great experiences with QF myself lately especially on the LAX route. I would vote yes.

Sheep

P.S. Sold my shares last week
Sheep Guts is offline  
Old 9th May 2005, 12:13
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Devonport Tasmania Australia
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sheeps

The EK network ex DXB into Europe is just plain scary - Into all major European capitols, and into places like Nice, and Birmingham, Manchester, Heathrow and Gatwick and it just goes on and on.

Birmingham is a beauty. 45 minute connection time - EI DUB BHX and then EK with 45 minute minima - I avoid that and put them back a flight but it is there if needed.

I have a fair idea that the industry as a whole has no idea what a juggernaut EK actually is. We are finding that it is prudent to sell them more often than not. Price and schedule.

Time will tell of those who fell and who was left behind.

Best all

EWL
Eastwest Loco is offline  
Old 9th May 2005, 22:23
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: East of the West Island
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coming into this pretty late in the day and only got thu to page 2 before tiring of all the bleating - HOWEVER

Plas Tique - you da man - hit the nail right on the head. There are always lessons to be learned from history aren't there?

I think that overall the NZ public has benefited from the competition brought by overseas owned airline(s) flying domestic routes - something STILL NOT RECIPROCATED by our Western neighbours since the infamous fax episode.

I can't see any reason the Okker public wouldn't reap the same benefits with improvements to service and a reduction of fares.

If you have any faith in your aviation product then competition shouldn't scare you - brace up to it.
Delta Whiskey is offline  
Old 12th May 2005, 07:13
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Delta Whiskey
Perhaps Singapore Airlines and Emirates should apply for Auckland San Francisco and Los Angeles etc as well ..... good for competition. I am sure the public will benefit as you ship the last remaining vestige of NZ aviation off overseas, then you can all get back to doing what you do best with sheep
Skinny Dog is offline  
Old 14th May 2005, 10:00
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: East of the West Island
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice note at the end Skinny Dingo - keeping the standard of debate right up there ...
They've been and gone before - Continental, United, Pan Am, Canadian to name some I remember flew out of NZAA to the East, and there are a whole bunch going West right now - where's the problem?? If someone who can offer a better service than your own mob comes along then surely it's a bloody good reason to pick up your game and not put up the barricades and huddle in the middle of your mediocrity.
Have a good one
Delta Whiskey is offline  
Old 14th May 2005, 18:59
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: nz
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skinny
With the open skys policy in NZ any carrier can operate to and from nz to the states.
We dont hide behind the goverment to protect us from competition.I think you will find the two carriers you mention are already looking at this so maybe Qf will get pushed out of SYD/AKL/LAX by superior product and service.
cnsnz is offline  
Old 15th May 2005, 00:46
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We dont hide behind the goverment to protect us from competition.
So where does the fact that AirNZ is over 80% (I think) owned by the NZ Government. Would they let AirNZ go bankrupt and lose their stake or would they step in to protect it, if necessary?
Three Bars is offline  
Old 15th May 2005, 08:58
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: nz
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say they would still step in probably with financial support and I dare say if QF the national carrier of australia was going the same way CBR would step in also, but that does not alter the fact that the NZ gov has an open skies policy that allows other airlines to compete against them on any route and not keep it purely for themselves.
cnsnz is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.