Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

How low could a low cost go?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jan 2005, 19:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How low could a low cost go?

Given the rise in low cost airlines and the never ending quest of airline management to invent new ways of saving money, I started thinking just how low could they go.

A few ideas:

1) Dumb down as many area's as possible, that way you can get most staff on minimum wages. (already in place)

2) Cut maintenence to a minimum, carry as many MEL's as possible for as long as possible. (already happens)

3) Seeing as pilots are so keen to pay for their endorsements, medicals, publications etc, get them to pay for thier sims and other training eg emergency procedures etc. (soon!)

4) Do away with aircraft cleaning (Almost there)

5) Do away with security and screening, or get the F/A's, pilots and ground staff to do it. (can't be to far off)

Just a few ideas. anymore?
rtforu is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2005, 20:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Highland, TX.
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I guess that has all already been done. So what?????


Are you trying to make a "small fortune" out of aviation????
Kornholio is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2005, 21:23
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Devil

Why pay pilots at all? Charge THEM! (PARC already operate some such scheme for 747 ab initios)
Regardless of the equipment you're using, there will always be pilots who will want experience on THAT type, on their way to achieving their "dream".

As a matter of fact, why not do the same with F/A's and some of the ground staff?
Work experience.

Make every aspect of the interview & "trial employment period" revenue productive - charge for the interviews.....at least 2, to keep the cash flow going. Charge for the compulsory uniforms, charge for Company ID.

As a matter of fact, there was posting on a thread on the main R&N forum that I'll just grab...
You should consider yourselves lucky that you are gainfully employed and let your employers continue to run their airline, their way.

The contract you are all working under and accepted with “eyes wide open” is one of the best contract positions available.

KE is heaven compared to most other Asian/Pacific Rim carriers so hang on to your positions and adhere to your contractual obligations.


This says it all, I think!
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2005, 22:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's an idea.

Install G/A style tacho's in all low cost airlines' jet aircraft. At the termination of the flight; armed operations staff will take the hourly reading. Then for each minute above the scheduled block time calculated at the appropriate a/c hourly rate; deduct this amount from Pilots salary.
Interceptor is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2005, 22:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Sydney
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great idea Kap.

If the QF beanies read this thread I'm sure they will be kicking themselves they hadn't thought of this first!

Maybe we could head them off at the pass and set up a company to supply pilots to Qantas and pay Qantas say 50K a year..er.... for the privilege of using their A/C. The CP is keen to sell Sim time so he will jump at this one for sure. You know, making Flt Ops a profit centre and all. Good for the bonus.

Then we advertise for wannabes and UGAL's to pay us say $100K a year for the privilege! Of course, they will need to pay for their endorsement too and anything else we can sting them for. We can't just give these valuable jet hours away!

Gotta be worth a shot. Form an orderly queue please!
bonvol is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2005, 23:41
  #6 (permalink)  
tinpis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
All airlines will be operating with Chinese crew in the not too distant future.
Travel from Oz to the UK will be $9.95 one way, tickets available from BIG W. and Target.
 
Old 26th Jan 2005, 00:18
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tinpis... What a fantastic idea.
rtforu is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 00:31
  #8 (permalink)  
tinpis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you...tin is more than just a pretty face

 
Old 26th Jan 2005, 00:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
will there be room for my camping stove on the seat back in front of me? and somewhere to store my freeze dried food for the lang haul flights?
Ultralights is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 00:44
  #10 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arrow

Well the pilots won' t be Chinese.
China already has a shortage of pilots, which is becoming more evident as current airlines in that country try to expand, and new ones start.

Expat pilot salaries in China have almost tripled in the past 2 or 3 years, as Chinese airlines attempt to attract more pilots, and realise that MOST professionals DON'T offer their services for a pittance, just to "gain experience"
The Chinese government has also recently mandated that Chinese airlines will not be ALLOWED to order new aircraft, unless they can prove they have the crews for them.

Many experienced Asian airlines pilots (MAS, SQ, Garuda) are leaving their established careers in the airlines of their birth countries, for higher remunerated positions with other carriers.

So although we're being squeezed at the top, the lower base salaries are rising considerably.
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 06:35
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs down

Why don't we have the passengers tip us like other service staff such as waiters and porters. Once they get used to the system management could further reduce our salaries as we should be able to live on tips like service staff in the USA who are paid peanuts and demand gratuaties from customers.

At the end of the flight the Captain could stand at the door with his hat in his hand to collect tips, which could then be divided up amongst the crew.

Suggest +/- 10% of the $49.99 Perth - Sydney fare.
Metro man is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 06:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

At the end of the flight the Captain could stand at the door with his hat in his hand to collect tips, which could then be divided up amongst the crew.
Metro man, the low cost operators don't give their pilots hats
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 07:03
  #13 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What?

You mean you guys are'nt already getting tips?

You must be doing something wrong!!

Cheers, HH.

Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 22:58
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's good to have a laugh about the antics of LCC's but on a more serious note, I guess we have to start to wonder what the overall effect it is having on the industry.

I couldn't imagine an endorsement done on the absolute cheap would be as good as an endorsement done inhouse. I'm guessing that if they are trying to save money and dumb down every department that safety would be treated any differently.

For me, I'm not prepared to put my family onto an aircraft operated by LCC. Sure, it might cost a bit more but you get what you pay for!
rtforu is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 23:39
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But how to keep morale high under such conditions?

I think one way to keep the morale up is to placard John Magee's "...on laughter-silvered wings" on the cockpit door so if ever in doubt a quick over the shoulder glance will return that love, devotion and feeling we all get when slipping the bonds.

Ibex is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 03:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mydadsbag
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I couldn't imagine an endorsement done on the absolute cheap would be as good as an endorsement done inhouse. I'm guessing that if they are trying to save money and dumb down every department that safety would be treated any differently.
Mate I couldnt imagine you being further out of touch!... Hmmm an independant company is selling endorsements, the success of such a business is gauged by the quality of of its candidates.

Then there's Dicko looking to save every cent he can. Do you really think the inhouse endorsement is going to be such a wonderful thing, when management is trying to put the screws on EVERYTHING including the "wonderful" inhouse endorsement?

I have plenty of mates of who have recently completed SO training in OZ and are the first to admit they have no idea about the type they are flying. My point is..... Big deal... an endorsement is just like any other bit of training given to us.... A licence to learn! Nobody is going to be an ace, regardless of where you did your endorsement on your first line flight.

As for the rest of your dribble, I hope you and your family wont ever have to fly in Europe, The States or when Australia catches up..... Here in 3 or 4 years!.... Cos if you wont go LCC you'll be walking or catching the train
bbbbbzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzbbbbbbbzzzzzzzzzz
Mr.Buzzy is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 04:32
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UAE
Age: 48
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And what about saving money in the air?How about they pay ATC providers less money and have the standards reduced accordingly?

-250ft LCC to LCC vertical standard. Still 1000ft between full paying customers and LCC.

-Aircraft on runway ahead 'almost' airborne or vacated.

-1NM radar standard in the TMA, 2NM enroute.

-5 minutes before time of passing enroute with no radar

-introduction of 'wouldn't hit in a pink fit' and 'big sky theory' standards

The list could go on.......

Cheers,

NFR.
No Further Requirements is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.