Air NZ near-crash A320 thread
Join Date: May 2000
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I deleted it, not the moderator.
It was getting stupid. No one had any useful information to give.
And there were just way to many people giving advise on Airbus and Boeing systems and handling. Most of which had obviously no experience on either type.
It was getting stupid. No one had any useful information to give.
And there were just way to many people giving advise on Airbus and Boeing systems and handling. Most of which had obviously no experience on either type.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Anywhere I lay my hat...
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey BK, good call.
At least you don't let the gossip get in the way of a good story.
I'm sure one day it will get out, but the powers at be are keeping the report close to their chest.
At least you don't let the gossip get in the way of a good story.
I'm sure one day it will get out, but the powers at be are keeping the report close to their chest.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunnunda & Godzone
Age: 74
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mr Proplever
What was that you were saying about censorship & thread nazis?
There was no censorship of the Jetsar thread. There was simply a friendly warning that disrespectful posts were not acceptable, and that I would delete the originating post, and thus the thread if some contributors couldn't be respectful.
The result was an attempt to push the limits by the clever annonymous folk, so the thread was deleted.
You don't have to agree with all points of view. You can disagree and argue the point to your hearts content. BUT be respectful.
The following is extracted from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Pray tell where is the evidence of censorship?
What was that you were saying about censorship & thread nazis?
There was no censorship of the Jetsar thread. There was simply a friendly warning that disrespectful posts were not acceptable, and that I would delete the originating post, and thus the thread if some contributors couldn't be respectful.
The result was an attempt to push the limits by the clever annonymous folk, so the thread was deleted.
You don't have to agree with all points of view. You can disagree and argue the point to your hearts content. BUT be respectful.
The following is extracted from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Pray tell where is the evidence of censorship?
Main Entry: cen·sor·ship
Pronunciation: 'sen(t)-s&r-"ship
Function: noun
1 a : the institution, system, or practice of censoring b : the actions or practices of censors; especially : censorial control exercised repressively
Pronunciation: 'sen(t)-s&r-"ship
Function: noun
1 a : the institution, system, or practice of censoring b : the actions or practices of censors; especially : censorial control exercised repressively
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was actually trying to follow the previous thread....'till it got zapped!
Could anyone let me know, at least what the rumour was. Something along the lines of an inadvertant autopilot disconnect on approach, descent to 78' RA over the Manakau Harbour (read: not over the runway of NZAA), and something to do with engines not spooling up quick enough.
No mention of it anywhere else so I'm intrigued if its an urban myth or not. Anyone have a date at least? Were there pax on board or was it a training sorte?
Cheers,
Dave
Could anyone let me know, at least what the rumour was. Something along the lines of an inadvertant autopilot disconnect on approach, descent to 78' RA over the Manakau Harbour (read: not over the runway of NZAA), and something to do with engines not spooling up quick enough.
No mention of it anywhere else so I'm intrigued if its an urban myth or not. Anyone have a date at least? Were there pax on board or was it a training sorte?
Cheers,
Dave