Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Latest on QF's LHR landing slots

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Latest on QF's LHR landing slots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Mar 2004, 05:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest on QF's LHR landing slots

Under the use it or lose it conditions applicable to the recently purchased $47 million landing slots at LHR it seems QF will be forced to wetlease AC to operate extensions to their existing Kangaroo route services. Most likely to and from Manchester.

Plans were it seems, to use the regular 744's that sit on the ground for 12 hours or so before returning south to operate these extensions.

Until someone remembered that they had already been committed to the regular P & O charter work during the European summer!

The impulsive purchase may turn very sour unless QF manages to sort out the rights to use them for their intended purpose.

Last edited by Left2primary; 18th Mar 2004 at 08:32.
Left2primary is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2004, 09:09
  #2 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Exclamation

Heard a rumour the other day that QF approached Boeing for some 744s to be told the aviation equivalent of 'Qantas? Aren't you the guys who went and ordered Airbus just recently? Sorry, no aircraft available.'

Who knows if it is true or not but we are struggling to find capacity to put into both LAX and the Roo Route!
Keg is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2004, 12:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Jeez...I don't know about this one.
Would you spend $47 million on slots you couldn't service?
You can fend off the opposition for only so long, but $47 million for 3 months sounds like expensive insurance to me. They must have some sort of backup plan if it doesn't come about.
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2004, 13:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 68
Posts: 2,027
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Keg, were your comments said tongue in cheek??

I don't think Boeing or any other manufacturer would turn away orders for whatever reason, least of all the 'you bought someone elses aircraft last time' nah nah nah nah nah.
Evanelpus is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2004, 15:41
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CPT Fathon,


methinks they are desperately trying to think of one now.

L2P
Left2primary is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2004, 19:41
  #6 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Evaneplus, the rumour centred on the fact that QF wanted some aircraft NOW to be told that Boeing couldn't help out with any preferential treatment on the production line. Wiih the industry picking up and recent QF orders for Airbus, why would Boeing fall over themselves to help out QF?!?!

Anyway, it was just a rumour.
Keg is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2004, 20:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Usually Oz
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Capt F,

With respect, these slots don't come onto the market every day and aren't traded like the stock exchange! They are like hen's teeth and the ability to grab a couple even if you have to do the 'Chieftain' trick [quite possible] might be seen in some quarters as quite a coup.

G'day
Feather #3 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2004, 21:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course there is the Airbus Option.......Rumour has it that the A340-500 is being considered as an addition to further Airbus A330-300 orders....these are from existing options ...so the Rumour has some credibility........This would make Perth London services possible...even desireable given the ability to avoid troubled areas over more traditional Routes.

Not to mention the possibility of East coast OZ ...East Coast US flights...........no wonder Singair is so desperate to achieve rights from the OZ Govt to fly OZ-US services now! they already have A340-500s ...Interesting Times Indeed !!
Minosavy Masta is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2004, 22:21
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Qld
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The hot rumour doing the rounds was that QF were looking to get 8 - 12 ex United 747-400's. No doubt this would give them 2 more flights into LHR daily, and extra capacity to add to the USA.
Skypatrol is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2004, 01:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
The hot rumour doing the rounds was that QF were looking to get 8 - 12 ex United 747-400's. No doubt this would give them 2 more flights into LHR daily, and extra capacity to add to the USA.
It would also give QF a full-house of 744s

RR powered 744s
GE powered 744s
PW powered 744s and
GE powered 744ERs

Realistically you can't imagine QF buying more 744s, especially older examples with a completely different engine type. It might be reasonable to suggest that they could lease a few until the A380s arrive but even then you'd think they'd want to outsource the maintenance of the PW powered birds to someone like SQ, TG or UA.
1A_Please is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2004, 03:30
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Best Place!
Posts: 208
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1A_Please -

The UA 744s aren't old ones - apparently they are brand new jets sitting in the desert because UA can't pay for them due to their Chapter 11 problems. Thai tried getting them but didn't put in a high enough bid, so I think QF are trying now.
mmmbop is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2004, 13:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Have heard a rumour that Cathay beat QF to the punch and secured the United -400s. QF has been looking at some ex Air Canada -400's (GE) and some South African -400's (RR).
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2004, 11:12
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UAE
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How long is a conversion course A330 to A340?

The drivers better be hoping that the Company go this way now so that there is a foot in the door for the A380. No precedent, Pornstar A320s (another Airbus twin) and the A380 as a new type... can smell one hell of a bunfight there.

What's more, wouldn't having A340s (especially 500s) enable QF to go head to head with EK? Unfortunately when you don't want to part with cash you end up without capacity. Let's hope there is something sourced from a desert soon otherwise the way Anderson is going QF will not just miss out on LHR. SFO, Chicago, Dallas, South America??

Makes me wonder whether QF are spending too much time in a low cost team talk and not watching the ball.... frisking pilots for every last cent and then wasting a lazy 50 million on this avoidable debacle. Unfortunately this is sounding familiar...again.

BS
Boyscout is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2004, 20:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 11 Posts
Reported in The Australian last week, QF July board meeting to be held in Tolouse - maybe for a big announcement or just a junket for the board memebrs?

QF has CASA approved CCQ for A330-A340. 3 day course.
The The is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2004, 22:33
  #15 (permalink)  
MoFo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
QF pay a sh*tload for LHR landing slots.

The Northern Summer is fast approaching.

The Olympic games are fast approaching.

Can you see a pattern here? They will probably be doing something to use those slots very soon, if they are not stupid.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.