Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

What Is The Real Story About The Ex AN B737 With Virgin Blue.

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

What Is The Real Story About The Ex AN B737 With Virgin Blue.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Feb 2004, 05:04
  #21 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

You're right Wiz. I was wrongly referring to a similar incident involving a New Zealand sc@b flying an Ansett B737 on the same/similar routing, in which he managed to hospitalise a significant number of pax. Reports of passengers "with bleeding ears, being taken by ambulance to Brisbane Hospital", made the headlines.
Fortunately, this incident didn't result in similar injuries, however the comments I made are still relevant in this case.
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2004, 05:08
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,793
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
Fortunately, this incident didn't result in similar injuries, however the comments I made are still relevant in this case.
Than why did you delete them?
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2004, 05:58
  #23 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Unhappy

Geez Wiz, it seems that whatever I do, you're going to whinge about it being the wrong thing. When the posts were up, you complained that they weren't relevant because I was referring to another incident (btw, thanks for persisting in pointing out my error ) - and now that I have deleted the offending entries, you're asking me why.
Are you sure that you're not my ex-wife??


Edit:
On another matter you raised..
I seem to remember an incident or two pre that date (like the TAA 737 nearly flying into the hills near TSV). But those incidents were never fully resolved, as it was AFAP policy for its' members not to take part in saftey inquieries!!
I believe that you might be referring to the DME arrival into CNS from the south, done over extremely mountainous terrain.
Pre-GPWS days, that approach, and the one into Coolangatta (also over high terrian) brought aircraft into close proximity if the DME steps were misread (there was always 1 "critical" step that would decide the descent profile).
Because of several close calls, the AFAP lobbied the Federal Government for height reporting radar to be installed at Cairns and Coolangatta Towers, so that ATC could also monitor aircraft altitudes.
It was simply incredible the resistance the Federation got, in trying to implement these Safety measures.

The irony though, is that the radar wasn't installed at CNS until during (or after) 1989, and that as history will show, it was not ONE but TWO Ansett A320's being flown by sc@bs (Canadian, from memory) that had their @sses saved, when ATC observed on their radar (for which the AFAP had been directly responsible for having implemented) that these aircraft would have made "contact" with the ground, had ATC not advised them.

Last edited by Kaptin M; 17th Feb 2004 at 06:16.
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2004, 08:34
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Hard to get a word in here with Kap and Wiz going at it!

Yes M, it was a Viscount at Winton that lost a wing, for the reason you gave. That was 68' I think.
amos2 is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2004, 10:38
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Asia
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amos

You are dating yourself!

The Mickey Mouse accident was New Year's Eve 68. 700 series deathtrap. Bailey was the skipper. 26 killed.

I think the Winton prang was an 800 series. 22 Sep 66. Remember that because it is both my brothers' birthday. 24 killed.

There was another one in the early 60's. Think 61.

Now back to the main event....

Traffic is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2004, 13:19
  #26 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,557
Received 111 Likes on 64 Posts
OMG! 68 upside down is 89!!!!!

How spooky is that!!!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2004, 14:07
  #27 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question

Trust YOU to bring "that year" into the discussion, Buster But 69 is still 69 whichever way you turn it!!

Thanks Amos and Traffic - out of interest, was it the same cause in all cases? And if so, why did it take so long to figure it out - after all a wing that separated due to the main spar being burnt through would seem fairly straightforward. Were any Mayday calls made?

Sorry for the temporary sidetrack people - a bit of Oz aviation history background.
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2004, 16:48
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Asia
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kap

Speaking of cunning linguists...give me call when you are next in Tokyo as we are yet to split that first goatskin. Do you still have my mobile #?

To sum up my knowledge of the trivia story...the MacMillers accident was due to fractured starboard inboard mainspar. Brian Bayley for all his skills couldn't do much when the starboard wing departed the rest of the a/c at 7,000ft.

The a/c was built in 1954 and I understand there had been some mods on the spar to extend the life of the airframe!!

I think the Winston accident was caused by a fire.
Traffic is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2004, 17:32
  #29 (permalink)  
Persona non grata
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VH-RMI which was lost near Winton was an 800.

The official cause was an incorrectly installed drain plug on a cabin blower (mounted on the gearbox).

The fire that ensued caused the aircraft to crash before it could be landed anywhere.
lame is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2004, 17:41
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Traffic is correct. In the Port hedland prang the wing bolts sheared outboard of #3 I think, and that was that. They had just made their 30 mile call and nothing further was heard!

Winton was a fire. No connection betwen the two. The early 60's Viscount prang was the break up in flight after t/off into CBs at Syd. A swag of a/c elected to return to the tarmac but the TAA skipper decided to go! Shortly after the gear came up the wings came off! Frightening isn't it!
amos2 is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2004, 18:13
  #31 (permalink)  
Persona non grata
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The -700s only had a single main spar, and the other 2 Ansett ones never flew again after that day, from memory it was New Years Day.

I had signed out VH-RMO at Essendon that day, and DCA (or whatever they were called then) came and confiscated all the log books before it could depart, before we even knew VH-RMQ had crashed.
lame is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.