BRISTOL JOBSWORTHS
I am a 30 years serving military Pilot.
I am out and about in the UK most days. In 30 years I have had nothing but professional help and service from all ATC units up and down the country. Thank you guys/gals, my job is difficult and there's nothing like the reasssuring voice of somebody at the other end of the airwaves when you need it, especially on a dark horrible night. Thankyou for 30 years of dealing with me. I was shocked recently to get the brush-off from Bristol on a poor weather day when i was transiting down the channel and could have done with a quick climb and transit to the east. I put it down to 'one of those days'.* But I hear from my colleagues that my experience is now standard and Bristol are behaving like proper jobsworths. Not interested in anything outside of controlled airspace. All you get is "remain clear of controlled airspace and **** OFF" I find this attitude appalling, especially when there's nobody else out there. whats going on?? Why behave in such a shoddy manner? *Im not stupid, he was waiting for me to bell-up. He just couldn't wait to be a obstructionist c##t. I was the only f##ker airborne in southern lockdown UK. What a ****. |
Wow. Arrogant much
|
Marly Lite
Why do you not consult NATS, the ANSP at Bristol? You might just find that they have a policy of only providing service within CAS. Your thoroughly offensive remarks do not impress. 2 s |
It could be they are, as a unit, trying to not provide services outside CAS due to workload, staff shortages, or something. Were you requesting a transit or just a service outside? Regardless, there's no excuse for being rude
|
Don’t be harsh
Obviously the blanked words were ‘cart’ and ‘fokker.
You would have to be a right pompous C*** and utter t**t to post otherwise. |
Looking at your previous posts, you seem a contented chap/chapess
Originally Posted by Marly Lite
(Post 10974888)
Anybody out there done this lately? I'm over 4 years into PAS (pilot) and I have had enough. Do I wait for the 5 year PAS point until I PVR, or do I press the button now, and let the 12 month PVR period take me over the 5 years qualifying period for PAS pension credits?
I assume that you haven’t become a civilian pilot because you are considered risky. You may want to read this..... the first line of para 1 could be of interest to you and your colleagues. (Kinda hope that you don’t have to manage a crew) CAA Guidance on Pilot Care |
Originally Posted by Marly Lite
(Post 10974888)
I am a 30 years serving military Pilot.
I am out and about in the UK most days. In 30 years I have had nothing but professional help and service from all ATC units up and down the country. Thank you guys/gals, my job is difficult and there's nothing like the reasssuring voice of somebody at the other end of the airwaves when you need it, especially on a dark horrible night. Thankyou for 30 years of dealing with me. I was shocked recently to get the brush-off from Bristol on a poor weather day when i was transiting down the channel and could have done with a quick climb and transit to the east. I put it down to 'one of those days'.* But I hear from my colleagues that my experience is now standard and Bristol are behaving like proper jobsworths. Not interested in anything outside of controlled airspace. All you get is "remain clear of controlled airspace and **** OFF" I find this attitude appalling, especially when there's nobody else out there. whats going on?? Why behave in such a shoddy manner? *Im not stupid, he was waiting for me to bell-up. He just couldn't wait to be a obstructionist c##t. I was the only f##ker airborne in southern lockdown UK. What a ****. Move along - nothing to see here. |
But the OP does shine a light on a problem that we have in the UK; the availability of surveillance based FIS in class G.
|
Marly,
wowzers buddy! No need for such strong language. I’m a military pilot too. Did you phone ATC after landing? Any time I’ve ever had an issue with ATC, that’s what I’ve done, albeit I’ve rarely had an issue. Every time we’ve had a friendly chat, and there's always been more to the situation than meets the eye. Just purely out of interest, outside of controlled airspace, was there a problem speaking to Cardiff, as Cardiff is the LARS provider for that area? Also, a thank you from me to all the controllers out there too. |
Originally Posted by Marly Lite
(Post 10974888)
I am a 30 years serving military Pilot.
I am out and about in the UK most days. In 30 years I have had nothing but professional help and service from all ATC units up and down the country. Thank you guys/gals, my job is difficult and there's nothing like the reasssuring voice of somebody at the other end of the airwaves when you need it, especially on a dark horrible night. Thankyou for 30 years of dealing with me. NOTAM C0526 says airport (and presumably ATC) closed 2359 to 0600 from 15 until 25 Jan at 0559. Or maybe their primary radar was 'off' for some reason; most airfields can only operate 'SSR only' to clear arrivals ie no transits then that's it. |
Originally Posted by 2 sheds
(Post 10974947)
Marly Lite
Why do you not consult NATS, the ANSP at Bristol? You might just find that they have a policy of only providing service within CAS. Your thoroughly offensive remarks do not impress. 2 s OK I've been retired for a number of years now and I know some units tend to 'jump' on controllers who 'bend' the rules on safety grounds but a bloke calling up for radar service in sh1tty weather outside my 'official' area of responsibility would never stop me invoking a certain sentence in MATS Part 1 and helping if I could. |
I tend to agree with Marly Lite. Bristol ATC can be difficult. Most "based" pilots are aware of those who are less than helpful and the service varies depending who is on duty. However ATC provide a champagne service in comparison to the yokels who provide ground security. I will quite happily never operate out of Bristol again. Provincial.
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Bahada
(Post 10975056)
I tend to agree with Marly Lite. Bristol ATC can be difficult. Most "based" pilots are aware of those who are less than helpful and the service varies depending who is on duty. However ATC provide a champagne service in comparison to the yokels who provide ground security. I will quite happily never operate out of Bristol again. Provincial.
But to close his post with that expletive laden rant is simply unhelpful and smacks of someone who is far to fond of their own voice and entirely uninterested in any perspective other than their own. |
Jobsworth: someone who is unlikely to step past some petty rule because “it’s more than my job’s worth”.
In these times it’s hardly surprising that someone in an industry haemorrhaging money wants to keep their job more than they want to provide a service (presumably) outside of the rules. Get the rule changed rather than attacking the player. |
Originally Posted by Dan Dare
(Post 10975136)
Jobsworth: someone who is unlikely to step past some petty rule because “it’s more than my job’s worth”.
In these times it’s hardly surprising that someone in an industry haemorrhaging money wants to keep their job more than they want to provide a service (presumably) outside of the rules. Get the rule changed rather than attacking the player. MATS Part 1 (CAP 493) Section 1 Chapter 1 para 1.2 second sentence beginning 'However nothing in this manual prevents controllers from using their own discretion and initiative .....' My favourite bit; I used it many times when providing LARS and was never 'pulled' for doing it like controllers are nowadays. |
Originally Posted by chevvron
(Post 10975159)
The 'rule change' is already permitted:-(and has been for over 50 years)
MATS Part 1 (CAP 493) Section 1 Chapter 1 para 1.2 second sentence beginning 'However nothing in this manual prevents controllers from using their own discretion and initiative .....' My favourite bit; I used it many times when providing LARS and was never 'pulled' for doing it like controllers are nowadays. |
Originally Posted by alfaman
(Post 10975179)
That quote is incomplete - "...in response to unusual circumstances, which may not be covered by the procedures herein." That favoured quote is not permission to break rules which are covered within Mats Part 1, or indeed Part 2 - I've seen people come very unstuck misunderstanding that.
|
Originally Posted by chevvron
(Post 10975269)
And 'unusual circumstances' doesn't include an aircraft being stuck at low level in cr@p weather at night asking a radar unit for an IFR climb then?
|
Folks,
Firstly, let me apologise for being so err..., vociferous! (I really am turning into my old man!!) secondly, thanks for your replies. I guess what I am really saying is, how is it that the likes of, say, Leeds respond with: good evening C/S XX, here's your squawk here's your airspace crossing you asked for in exchange for a heading or level modification and have a nice night" (or I might help you if I am able...) and Bristol....literally not even allowed to get a request in. (Don't ask, I'm not going to help). Is this a shift in attitude; a shift in regulatory framework; or a shift in what is expected of the modern controller? I could understand it if it was a London-based agency. Never had this before, always got a pleasant reply even if it was: sorry mate too busy today. |
Originally Posted by Marly Lite
(Post 10975321)
Folks,
Firstly, let me apologise for being so err..., vociferous! (I really am turning into my old man!!) secondly, thanks for your replies. I guess what I am really saying is, how is it that the likes of, say, Leeds respond with: good evening C/S XX, here's your squawk here's your airspace crossing you asked for in exchange for a heading or level modification and have a nice night" (or I might help you if I am able...) and Bristol....literally not even allowed to get a request in. (Don't ask, I'm not going to help). Is this a shift in attitude; a shift in regulatory framework; or a shift in what is expected of the modern controller? I could understand it if it was a London-based agency. Never had this before, always got a pleasant reply even if it was: sorry mate too busy today. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:04. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.