PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   ATC Issues (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues-18/)
-   -   Annoying habits (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/625789-annoying-habits.html)

PilotViking 24th Sep 2019 14:36

Annoying habits
 
What are the most annoying things for you air traffic controllers that we pilots do thats annoying , unnecessary or just plain stupid?


chevvron 24th Sep 2019 15:17

Identing without us requesting it.
Serves no useful purpose as we have to observe your response to our request for ident.

Juggler25 24th Sep 2019 15:17


Originally Posted by PilotViking (Post 10578370)
What are the most annoying things for you air traffic controllers that we pilots do thats annoying , unnecessary or just plain stupid?

<Rant>
  1. Ignoring speed instructions (happens way more frequently then it should).
  2. Lying about ignoring speed instructions. We have Mode S so can see what you're doing. If you can't make a descent restriction work with an assigned speed just tell me and I'll change the plan.
  3. Announcing on the RT that you're logged on to CPDLC. Doing so literally defeats the point of the system.
  4. Telling me that you've started descent.
</Rant>

:}

Del Prado 24th Sep 2019 15:44

Rushing to check in on freq. I sometimes can’t even correct a wrong read back before someone else is jumping in. Your first call is usually not that urgent (but if it is we will call you.)

First call to Director: long transmissions giving speed, QNH, next point or name of STAR, etc. Regardless of what you’re supposed to say the only things we need are aircraft type and cleared level.
We can see your speed on radar and strips, a fresh QNH will be given on first descent to an altitude.
Each extra item on first call increases the length of the transmission exponentially and there’s nothing worse than watching an aircraft fly through the localiser or turn outbound in the hold because the frequency is blocked with someone saying “and the err..um...QNH is....um....I’ve got it here...somewhere....”

Asking for climb/descent/WX avoidance when it’s self evident from TCAS or �� there’s another aircraft RIGHT THERE.


Thanks for asking PilotViking!


SThor 24th Sep 2019 16:17

“Control, ABC123, request” (Makes me reach for pen and paper preparing for what must surely be an extremely out of the ordinary request!)
”ABC123, control, go ahead (pen in hand)”
“ABC123 request 1000’ up or down” (thinking why didn’t they just say that in the first transmission).

”ABC123, standby” (I might have to check with the next sector or unit if you’re requesting something or I’m on the phone and intend to call you back)
”Standing by, ABC123” (seriously!?!) :ugh:

Also; “standing by for descent/lower”, “request FXXX if available” :)


HEATHROW DIRECTOR 24th Sep 2019 16:26

Reminds me of a late colleague at Heathrow. Told by GMC to listen on 118.5 (Tower) a pilot came on the tower freq with: "XXX listening on 118.5". My colleague said "So am I, but I'm being quiet about it!"

Talkdownman 24th Sep 2019 16:46

From my experience, here's a few to be going on with:

Protracted initial calls, e.g. passing full flight details (and / or irrelevant info) on first transmission on a Freecall.
Failing to standby when asked.
Uncommanded IDENT.
Non-compliance with speed control. Not telling the truth when asked to confirm flying assigned speed.
Transmitting when asked to monitor, e.g. "Monitor (agency) on (channel)"..."Hi (Agency), this is (callsign) monitoring / listening out / standing by on your frequency"
Transmitting more than required when asked to check-in 'callsign only'..."Hi Director (callsign) with you, out of blah blah, descending blah blah, QNH blah blah, coming back to blah blah, field in sight, requesting visual, any chance of the Left.." etc
Not making any reasonable attempt to minimise use of runway, e.g. rolling to the end at taxy speed.

spekesoftly 24th Sep 2019 18:50

Early 1980s, Gatwick Tower to a BCAL DC10 pilot - "Vacate Right before Surrey".
Pilot's reply - "I've paid for the full length, so I'm using it"

zonoma 24th Sep 2019 21:42

"I know we've only filed FL230 today but if you can let the French know we're after FL410........" :ugh: :ugh: :ugh: :ugh:

Converting from a Mach to IAS below FL270, having been told "convert to 250kts" and still accelerating to 325kts and then saying "we're still on a Mach". Thanks.

PilotViking 24th Sep 2019 22:20

out of curiosity, how much extra work does it cause when we ask for shortcuts that takes us outside controlled airspace? i.e deconfliction service etc

Thanks for the replies!

chevvron 25th Sep 2019 04:30


Originally Posted by PilotViking (Post 10578690)
out of curiosity, how much extra work does it cause when we ask for shortcuts that takes us outside controlled airspace? i.e deconfliction service etc

Thanks for the replies!

'Leaving controlled airspace; terminating radar service; freecall Farnborough Radar on xxx.xxx'.https://www.pprune.org/images/icons/46.gif

kontrolor 25th Sep 2019 08:13


Originally Posted by Juggler25 (Post 10578402)
<Rant>
  1. Ignoring speed instructions (happens way more frequently then it should).
  2. Lying about ignoring speed instructions. We have Mode S so can see what you're doing. If you can't make a descent restriction work with an assigned speed just tell me and I'll change the plan.
  3. Announcing on the RT that you're logged on to CPDLC. Doing so literally defeats the point of the system.
  4. Telling me that you've started descent.
</Rant>

:}

all of above plus chit-chating on 121.5

jmmoric 25th Sep 2019 08:18

Landing and slowing down to taxispeed, and still expecting to vacate at the exit at the runway end when the frequency is busy, yes, I will throw you off at the first exit if needed, even if it's the wrong side and you'll have to cross again later :)

And the initial call before making a request.... as SThor mentioned.

Not understanding the difference between a visual approach and VFR (that's not really annoying, just mildly surprising).

Over the years you'll get used to pilots being "morning lazy" and not paying attention, so when traffic picks up you'll end up with the 4 or 5 instructions you'll have to repeat until everyone seems to wake up... That's not really annoying, just part of the job, and I don't mind it :)

Brian 48nav 25th Sep 2019 09:31

Having been given line-up clearance and once established on the runway stating your intention to take 3minutes or more behind the departing heavy. You can of course take as long as you like - but let the ATCO know before lining up and they will find someone, if they can, to go ahead of you. Certainly was the case at LL/LHR.

Level bust 25th Sep 2019 09:46

When an a/c wanted to transit the zone and asked if he was VFR, I lost count of the number of times they replied with Roger! More than once I was tempted to say is that roger yes or roger no!

AerocatS2A 26th Sep 2019 09:06


Originally Posted by Juggler25 (Post 10578402)
<Rant>
  1. Ignoring speed instructions (happens way more frequently then it should).
  2. Lying about ignoring speed instructions. We have Mode S so can see what you're doing. If you can't make a descent restriction work with an assigned speed just tell me and I'll change the plan.
  3. Announcing on the RT that you're logged on to CPDLC. Doing so literally defeats the point of the system.
  4. Telling me that you've started descent.
</Rant>

:}

4. is a requirement in Australia (why? I don't know), so not surprising that some pilots do it elsewhere.

1985 26th Sep 2019 14:22

Switching to a new frequency and then starting to talk a millisecond later. Listen out first please!


​​

rolaaand 26th Sep 2019 15:46


Originally Posted by PilotViking (Post 10578690)
out of curiosity, how much extra work does it cause when we ask for shortcuts that takes us outside controlled airspace? i.e deconfliction service etc

Thanks for the replies!

It can cause a lot, coordination with other sectors/airfields to accept the route and provide the service. Plus these requests are usually made with an “if it helps” can we take a dc and go direct. It rarely helps, it is taking you from a known traffic environment into an unknown one. The workload on us increases and I suspect that a lot of the commercial pilots who ask for these services don’t have a clue what their responsibilities are outside CAS or how they drop way down the controller’s priorities when they choose to do this. Pilot’s even accepting to route through intense gliding areas in their big passenger jets to save a couple of minutes. It’s all fun and games until the collision.

Other daily ball aches?

1-Uncommanded ident.
2-Not only ignoring speed control instructions but flat out lying when challenged and getting pissy about it too. At least daily this occurs.
3-Reading back by voice an instruction sent by CPDLC 🤷🏻*♂️
4-Repeated requests for something when a good reason has been given for refusal, eg direct when it would take you through an active danger area. I don’t refuse direct routes for no reason.
5-Being given a when ready clearance to be level by a point and then missing it, sometimes by many thousands of feet. Causes coordination and sometimes separation issues.
6-The never ending turbulence chat from the Americans on a bumpy day. It was forecast, I’ve told you there’s no smooth levels, stop cluttering up my frequency with your light chop banter.
7-“What’s the traffic ahead of us?” It doesn’t matter, I’ve slowed you down because it is busy. I’m well aware your Airbus can do 340kts, it can also do 250, quit moaning.
8-Asking the reason for the delay when the frequency is congested with arrivals and I’m sending everything to the hold. It’s not because I like making pretty patterns on the radar.

aaaand relax.

That was quite therapeutic.

Generally though, pilots are a pretty sound and professional bunch and the overwhelming majority are excellent in their interactions with atc. A handful of roasters wind us up, but that’s probably a two way street.

Juggler25 26th Sep 2019 16:35


Originally Posted by AerocatS2A (Post 10579872)
4. is a requirement in Australia (why? I don't know), so not surprising that some pilots do it elsewhere.

Yeah in this part of the world it tends to be the Swiss and Italians that do it the most so am guessing it's a requirement there as well.


"I know we've only filed FL230 today but if you can let the French know we're after FL410........"
"Yes of course I'll let the French know" - Turns to colleague and carrys on conversation about last nights Game of Thrones.... :}


Generally though, pilots are a pretty sound and professional bunch and the overwhelming majority are excellent in their interactions with atc. A handful of roasters wind us up, but that’s probably a two way street.
Spot on.

terrain safe 26th Sep 2019 20:56

Not listening at all, especially when really busy and the aircraft is number 1 at the hold, or at a 2 mile final and they are called with no answer. Today 1 aircraft was called 3 times before answering when inside 2 miles from touchdown. Surely you must be expecting a call!!
Not listening on the GMC frequency so increasing the workload. I know you have lots to do for your quick turn around, but if you listen you might get there quicker.
Stop sniffing at a runway high speed exit and then slowly taxying to the next exit. Not only anoyying and delaying everything but also might mean another aircraft has to go around due to you wandering down the runway. Get off the runway asap!!
Stopping on the runway and then turning really slowly down the high speed exit. Just be glad we don't have live microphones!
Calling on GMC that you are approaching where you have been told to hold. I know you are, but there is something either in your way, or about to be, so stop wasting RT time.
Asking to roll to the end as it's easier for you when you can see about 10 aircraft at the holding point witing to depert. As one pilot said on the RT recently when this very request was made by a company aircraft "numpty".

Most pilots are fine and get there and help us out, but the ones who don't......


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:34.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.