PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   ATC Issues (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues-18/)
-   -   Couple of silly questions (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/219133-couple-silly-questions.html)

Karen83 27th Mar 2006 16:39

Couple of silly questions
 
1. Currently there are 3 en- route centres. When Manchester moves to Prestwick, will it remain as Manchester? Or will the two be merged leaving 2 en- routes, Swanwick and Scottish?

2. Can you define what an airfield is for me? Are they just airports not owned by BAA?

Thanks x

chevvron 27th Mar 2006 16:42

Bet she can't map-read either.

BDiONU 27th Mar 2006 16:47


Originally Posted by Karen83
1. Currently there are 3 en- route centres. When Manchester moves to Prestwick, will it remain as Manchester? Or will the two be merged leaving 2 en- routes, Swanwick and Scottish?

2. Can you define what an airfield is for me? Are they just airports not owned by BAA?

Thanks x

There are currently 4 NERL centres:
LACC at Swanwick
TC at West Drayton
MACC at Manchester
and
ScOACC at Prestwick

TC is moving to LACC and they'll merge, MACC is moving to ScOACC and they'll merge leaving NATS with its 2 centre strategy.

An airfield is an aerodrome is an airport is a whatever name you want to give it, nothing to do with who the operator is.

HTH
BD

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 27th Mar 2006 16:52

But an airPORT is an aerodrome with customs facilities...

BDiONU 27th Mar 2006 16:54


Originally Posted by HEATHROW DIRECTOR
But an airPORT is an aerodrome with customs facilities...

really? Wow I never knew that :) Thanks HD

BD

Brian81 27th Mar 2006 17:12

With greatest respect to my close colleague HD, I'm not too sure that is the case...

An Aerodrome (as defined in the ANO & MATS 1):

Any area of land or water designed, equipped, set apart or
commonly used for affording facilities for the landing and departure
of aircraft.

And in the Aerodrome licencing manual:

Any area of land or water designed, equipped, set apart or
commonly used for affording facilities for the landing and departure
of aircraft and includes any area or space, whether on the ground,
on the roof of a building or elsewhere, which is designed,
equipped or set apart for affording facilities for the landing and
departure of aircraft capable of descending or climbing vertically,
but shall not include any area the use of which for affording
facilities for the landing and departure of aircraft has been
abandoned and has not been resumed.


It doesnt specify the difference between a customs aerodrome and a non-customs aerodrome. I think the whole airport / airfield / aerodrome name thing is all to do with local slang tendancies and language variations.

I have an Aerodrome Control Licence, at a customs aerodrome / airport whatever you want to call the place. I have my own name for it, ending *** hole.

Personally, I'd define an AIRFIELD as a grass runway aerodrome.

heehee.

Traaaaaaaaaaaaa.

I'm not joking sir 27th Mar 2006 17:48

I was always taught that there is no such thing as an airfield. It's a bit like talking about "planes".

rab-k 27th Mar 2006 18:19

Nobody I've asked seems to know the answer to this, so I'll chance my luck here:

What will the combined ScACC and MACC airspace be referred to as?

Will it remain the Manchester FIR and Scottish FIR/UIR both controlled from the same Ops Room, or will it become a combined Prestwick FIR/UIR?

The new centre is dubbed Prestwick as opposed to 'Scottish', but it can't become POACC as that already exists in the form of the Prestwick Oceanic Area Control Centre at ScOACC.

Also, what if the Dublin TMA goes to Prestwick under the proposed FAB?

Could a possible option be to mirror the Canadians who have their Gander Domestic FIR and Gander Oceanic FIR at a single unit, referred to simply as Gander Center? After all I understand that the ocean will eventually be in the new building also. (Swanwick is simply London Centre also).

Will it become known as just Prestwick Centre, with a Prestwick Domestic FIR and Prestwick OACC controlling the Shanwick OCA?

Not about to lose any sleep over it, just curious... but hey, what's in a name?

:8

MancBoy 27th Mar 2006 18:57

Manchester FIR ??


Where's that then.

London FIR and Scottish FIR are the only two we have on the mainland.

Kestrel_909 27th Mar 2006 19:58


Originally Posted by rab-k

After all I understand that the ocean will eventually be in the new building also. (Swanwick is simply London Centre also).


Must be a bloody big building then!:}


Sorry

rab-k 27th Mar 2006 20:28

Oops !

Sorry, got carried away! (or should be carried off, one or t'other!)

I did of course mean that part of the London FIR controlled by MACC. ("Manchester FIR" - duh!).

:\

Bern Oulli 27th Mar 2006 21:17

You mean what used to be the Preston FIR (it's near Manchester, well, sort of) before London pinched it?

foghorn 28th Mar 2006 09:42


Originally Posted by I'm not joking sir
It's a bit like talking about "planes".

Like the one when a pilot had a journo filming a documentary on his flight deck. She was provide a commentary for the camera - "planes" this, "planes" that, "planes" the other.

"Madam", the pilot responds in his best RAF voice, "planes are used by carpenters; this is an Aircraft".

Jerricho 28th Mar 2006 11:23

So is an Airplane like an Airguitar?

Gonzo 28th Mar 2006 11:27

Airports are busy, like Heathrow.

Airfields are quiet, like Gatwick and Manchester.

:E

keithl 28th Mar 2006 11:49

Karen: I've always thought an airfield was military and an airport civilian. My reason for this is that when I was in the RAF both controllers and pilots used the abbreviation 'field.. Examples; "identified 30 miles north of the field..." or "field in sight". I know the official documents talk about "Military Aerodromes", but no-one would have used aerodrome, or airport when referring to a military airfield. I noticed the difference when I went civvie a few years ago.

ukatco_535 28th Mar 2006 12:02

Airports have at least a dual runway operation, and are only the 6th or 7th busiest dual runway airport in the world - like Heathrow.

Airfields use single runway, but are the busiest single runway operator in the world - like Gatwick.

:E :E :E

Dances with Boffins 29th Mar 2006 13:55

Down South 'ere, the difference is:-

airport = "there is the port"
airfield = "there is a field":}

niknak 29th Mar 2006 14:16

Some moons ago, I was at CATC doing an OJTI renewal course.
There we were, the 10 of us, in the coffee lounge discussing how much we were enjoying the course, war stories, shipwrecks and murders, when one of the many cadets in the same room approached us and said "we've been half listening to you guys, and we assume you are all "real ATCOs", what's it like?"...
The rest is available to gullible persons, for a fee.......

Gonzo 29th Mar 2006 16:09

At airfields, such as Gatwick, an ATCO might speak to maybe 60-70 a/c in one hour.

At airports, such as Heathrow, an ATCO might speak to 120+ a/c an hour. :E

PPRuNe Radar 30th Mar 2006 10:05

Any truth in the rumour that the new LHR Tower has been constructed from ivory ?? :)

spekesoftly 30th Mar 2006 11:56


Originally Posted by keithl
Karen: I've always thought an airfield was military and an airport civilian. My reason for this is that when I was in the RAF both controllers and pilots used the abbreviation 'field.. Examples; "identified 30 miles north of the field..." or "field in sight". I know the official documents talk about "Military Aerodromes", but no-one would have used aerodrome, or airport when referring to a military airfield. I noticed the difference when I went civvie a few years ago.

Whilst I can see what you're getting at, I don't think you can entirely base any military/civil distinction between Airfield and Airport on the phraseology you quote. As I'm sure you know, the same phrases you quote are also regularly used in civvie ATC, and "field in sight" appears in CAP 413 as an example of both military and civil phraseology.

Gonzo 30th Mar 2006 12:22

Radar, yes. Ivory worked very well at Stansted and Gatwick, and they like it.

We think it's unsafe and will decrease our capacity....:E

keithl 30th Mar 2006 12:57

Speke: Yes, they weren't the best examples, but I was just "dashing off" a quick reply. I thought later it might have made the point better by comparing the mil "diversion airfield" with the civvy "alternate airport". I'm just recalling conversational usage rather than R/T. In conversation, (Caveats: In my time / In my part of the Air Force) no-one would have used "Aerodrome / Airport" in conversation. Only "Airfield".

spekesoftly 30th Mar 2006 13:59

keithl,

As another 'ex-mil', similar vintage, I entirely agree with your comment about 'conversational usage'.

(Mind you, my parents, both ex-WWII and now well into their 80s, still quaintly refer to my place of work as the 'drome !! )

classicwings 31st Mar 2006 09:46

But surely Gonzo you are basically saying the same thing to Heathrow inbounds whereas Gatwick Directors (never mind Essex Radar!!) are giving more varied instructions to inbound a/c?:ok:

Gonzo 31st Mar 2006 11:17

I'm talking about real ATC, that done from a control tower, not a supplement to TCAS done in front of a radar screen in a big bunker..... :E:E:E

classicwings 31st Mar 2006 11:43

Goodness, thats abit scathing towards radar control isnt it?! I suppose they have the advantage fatter pay cheques at the end of the month but they might have alittle difficulty in identifying what an aircraft looks like.....

Surely though if you have been at the Heathrow VCR prior to '93 before TC sucked up your radars then you would have had a radar rating!:E

ukatco_535 31st Mar 2006 11:47


At airfields, such as Gatwick, an ATCO might speak to maybe 60-70 a/c in one hour.

At airports, such as Heathrow, an ATCO might speak to 120+ a/c an hour.
So dividing those numbers by the number of runways in use (and bearing in mind one controller per runway); You are admitting that Gatwick is at the very least, as busy as Heathrow :E

classicwings 31st Mar 2006 11:54

At airfields, such as Gatwick, an ATCO might speak to maybe 60-70 a/c in one hour.

At airports, such as Heathrow, an ATCO might speak to 120+ a/c an hour.

So dividing those numbers by the number of runways in use (and bearing in mind one controller per runway); You are admitting that Gatwick is at the very least, as busy as Heathrow

Certainly confirms the fact that Gatwick is the busiest single operation runway in the world.

Gonzo 31st Mar 2006 12:56

I surely hope that they do not have fatter pay cheques!:oh:

Move Approach back at the tower, that's the way forward. Would sort out the LL Approach staffing problem!:ok:


You are admitting that Gatwick is at the very least, as busy as Heathrow
Not if you read my post. :confused:

throw a dyce 31st Mar 2006 13:28

I say Gonzo,aren't you EGLL tower only types just glorified car park attendants.:ouch:
At least you guys know how to say ''Clearded to Land''.
Ever validated a Radar rating working in Class A,D,F,G airspace?:hmm:
There are people who still validate tower and approach radar,north of Watford.

classicwings 31st Mar 2006 13:38

Ok Gonzo, well I dont actually work for NATS or Air Traffic in any sense (failed applicant twice!:ugh: ) but i am aware that the NATS payscale is based more on your time in the job (should know as my old man has worked for NATS for ther past god knows how many eons) so I take that back about approach controllers being on 'fatter paycheques' Although you could argue that radar has 'different' sorts of challenges. I have seen both sides of the operation both at Heathrow VCR and with your colleagues at TC and I can see that ensuring necessary vortex wake spacings would be pretty tricky on radar but remembering the names of all the holding points at Heathrow from a visual control point of view would be a complete nightmare! :E

Gonzo 31st Mar 2006 13:53

Finally, a bit of banter! :D

North of Watford...bit cold up there for us sophisticated southerners!

All those non-squawkers, non-radios.....no thanks, you can keep 'em! :ok:

classicwings 31st Mar 2006 13:57


Originally Posted by throw a dyce
I say Gonzo,aren't you EGLL tower only types just glorified car park attendants.:ouch:
At least you guys know how to say ''Clearded to Land''.
Ever validated a Radar rating working in Class A,D,F,G airspace?:hmm:
There are people who still validate tower and approach radar,north of Watford.

Yer like you probably fall into this category if you an ATCO and you dont work for NATS...... I think I would much prefer working for a Private organsation which is how it used to be in the good old days where you will atleast be able to obtain aerodrome and approach ratings rather than being sent like a robot to CATC in Bournemouth to and up working in a Air Traffic factory! :ok:

throw a dyce 2nd Apr 2006 00:18

Classicwings.
There are quite a few Nats units were Tower and Approach are the norm.Bristol,Cardiff,Birmingham,Manchester,Belfast,Glasgow,E dinburgh,Aberdeen,and Gibraltar spring to mind.Don't know about Aberporth?
Everyone is paid much less than Heathrow,and bar one (Manch) less than Gatwick.However ATC wise it's much more interesting than the sausage machines in the South.
Gonzo,
You Southern softies should listen to a certain Billy Connolly when he says there is no such thing as bad weather,just the wrong kind of clothes.We do have SSR and radios North of Watford you know.Probably invented them:ok:

Gonzo 2nd Apr 2006 07:33

Ah, but do you have colour TV?

funfly 2nd Apr 2006 12:04

An airport is a big airfield
An airfield is what you say is 'in sight' then you can see the runways, unless you are at an airport when you say "runway in sight"
An aerodrome is something Spitfires used to land on

chevvron 3rd Apr 2006 08:11

Thow a dyce - you missed out Farnborough and Southampton. Aberporth airfield is FISO but NATS still supply staff to Aberporth (Cardigan Bay) Range Control via (I think) Cardiff. These controllers also do range control in the Hebrides range.

classicwings 4th Apr 2006 07:58


Originally Posted by throw a dyce
Classicwings.
There are quite a few Nats units were Tower and Approach are the norm.Bristol,Cardiff,Birmingham,Manchester,Belfast,Glasgow,E dinburgh,Aberdeen,and Gibraltar spring to mind.Don't know about Aberporth?
Everyone is paid much less than Heathrow,and bar one (Manch) less than Gatwick.However ATC wise it's much more interesting than the sausage machines in the South.
Gonzo,
You Southern softies should listen to a certain Billy Connolly when he says there is no such thing as bad weather,just the wrong kind of clothes.We do have SSR and radios North of Watford you know.Probably invented them:ok:

Point taken throw a dyce, I am aware of NATS units where tower and approach still exist but I think my bite was focused more towards current trainee cadets prospects of been able to get but aerodrome and approach ratings. Seems now you are streamed either on an approach or area course following your initial training on the course but from what I can gather after signing my life away on my initial declaration there is currently little chance of being sent to anywhere else other than Swanwick!:::oh:


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.