Why no AVA's for EGLL Tower?
Ohcirrej
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why no AVA's for EGLL Tower?
Given the sizeable delays that occured on Friday and Saturday afternoons/evenings just gone, I am more than a little curious as to why no AVA's were brought for the tower? Perhaps I am stirring trouble just a little bit, but I'm sure while we don't mind 5 mile spacing for a couple of hours, I'm sure our merry band of travellers don't really enjoy the 30 mins holding.
Any thoughts/abuse etc. welcome (apart form you P7, if I want your opinion, I'll send it to you!
)
Any thoughts/abuse etc. welcome (apart form you P7, if I want your opinion, I'll send it to you!
)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: England
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll add my twopennyworth if I may.
Surely the 'small' cost of an AVA is nothing compared to the tens of thousands of pounds worth of fuel that were burnt holding over the last 2 evenings.
Surely the 'small' cost of an AVA is nothing compared to the tens of thousands of pounds worth of fuel that were burnt holding over the last 2 evenings.
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: London, England
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely the cost of paying controllers at Heathrow/TC/NERC more money, so that they don't keep leaving for other units, wouldn't amount to anywhere near as much as the cost of the delays!!
You would think that maybe somebody would have figured it out
You would think that maybe somebody would have figured it out
Ohcirrej
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I totally agree with you guys...................
But also, I seem to remember hearing something about the government's plans to "fine" NATS for any delays attributable to them (can't remember the exact details, something about if greater than an average of 1.5 mins per a/c). I wonder if when this is implemented there would be a change of heart.
Also, I am looking forward to seeing exactly how many minutes delay were caused on that great little notice-board in the East Foyer. Or when this month's propaganda Newsletter comes out, will there be any mention of the staffing situation and the effects it is having.............AGAIN!!! (This should be a big RED Topic in the "How are we doing?" section.)
Let's get Mr Everitt's views............what's that number again?
But also, I seem to remember hearing something about the government's plans to "fine" NATS for any delays attributable to them (can't remember the exact details, something about if greater than an average of 1.5 mins per a/c). I wonder if when this is implemented there would be a change of heart.
Also, I am looking forward to seeing exactly how many minutes delay were caused on that great little notice-board in the East Foyer. Or when this month's propaganda Newsletter comes out, will there be any mention of the staffing situation and the effects it is having.............AGAIN!!! (This should be a big RED Topic in the "How are we doing?" section.)
Let's get Mr Everitt's views............what's that number again?
I'm not sure I understand the apparent desire for AVAs. Surely it is a small step from regular AVAs to being told that you have no option and will attend an extra X days a year for a small increase in salary. I don't think that is in any of our interests.
I do believe that an appropriate level of pay (and respect) would help to keep staff, perhaps then AVAs would be an irrelevance.
I do believe that an appropriate level of pay (and respect) would help to keep staff, perhaps then AVAs would be an irrelevance.
Ohcirrej
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dan, my original wasn't expressing a desire for the all encompassing AVA. It stemmed from my almost embarressment at having to tell Pilots that we are 5 mile spacing due staff shortages in the tower, and your EAT is 35 mins from now. I'm sure anybody listening out on the freq could have heard the displeasure in both my voice and the poor sods in the stacks.
AVA's are a "Band-aid" solution to as you so correctly point out that they are not the solution to salary and respect issues. And I agree when you say that perhaps they are just a small step from "expected attendances" for all of us. I just don't like having to explain myself for somebody else's lack of assistance.
And let's throw caution to the wind. Special coming over to TC. Hmmm...........
PS - Scott: Nice one! Pitty they won't have the staff to run a 3rd runway anyway!
AVA's are a "Band-aid" solution to as you so correctly point out that they are not the solution to salary and respect issues. And I agree when you say that perhaps they are just a small step from "expected attendances" for all of us. I just don't like having to explain myself for somebody else's lack of assistance.
And let's throw caution to the wind. Special coming over to TC. Hmmm...........
PS - Scott: Nice one! Pitty they won't have the staff to run a 3rd runway anyway!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jerricho
As always mate you're completely right. it's about time the airlines started to complain about delayas caused by the useless staffing levels in the tower. Thames Radio going to TC will only make matters worse, the dual valids all wanting to leave the tower (cos it's a/. rubbish to work at and b/.chroinically understaffed and getting worse) thus meaning we in the tower are shorter still. Long may Thames stay, I say ( another hand greande of controversy floats into the air....).
Have to say Jerricho. you'll be sorely missed in these parts. Hope we'll still get your inquisitive tones on here and that you won't spend all of your free time moose hunting.
P7
Ps Jerricho, pm me with your days off so we can do beers. x
As always mate you're completely right. it's about time the airlines started to complain about delayas caused by the useless staffing levels in the tower. Thames Radio going to TC will only make matters worse, the dual valids all wanting to leave the tower (cos it's a/. rubbish to work at and b/.chroinically understaffed and getting worse) thus meaning we in the tower are shorter still. Long may Thames stay, I say ( another hand greande of controversy floats into the air....).
Have to say Jerricho. you'll be sorely missed in these parts. Hope we'll still get your inquisitive tones on here and that you won't spend all of your free time moose hunting.
P7
Ps Jerricho, pm me with your days off so we can do beers. x
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 24/7 Hardcore Heaven
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi guys,
Been reading this thread with much interest.....I'm starting on the ATCO course down at Bournemouth CATC next March.Without wanting to be presumptious,if I get through the course okay I'd really like to be posted at EGLL tower.Should I let your views dissuade me???It doesn't sound like much "fun" there,and I just wondered what your advice to a wet-behind-the-ears trainee would be with regards to getting posted there.I worked at LHR for 6 yrs as a dispatcher and loved every minute.I totally realise that being an ATCO is poles apart from this but is it really that bad there?
Cheers,
777.
Been reading this thread with much interest.....I'm starting on the ATCO course down at Bournemouth CATC next March.Without wanting to be presumptious,if I get through the course okay I'd really like to be posted at EGLL tower.Should I let your views dissuade me???It doesn't sound like much "fun" there,and I just wondered what your advice to a wet-behind-the-ears trainee would be with regards to getting posted there.I worked at LHR for 6 yrs as a dispatcher and loved every minute.I totally realise that being an ATCO is poles apart from this but is it really that bad there?
Cheers,
777.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
777;
I wouldn't let anything disuade you <G>... Working traffic anywhere with some traffic is always FUN! It's just dealing with some of the office politics as well as some of the suits rules and other such things that gets to be a royal pain in the butt at times. From all of my travels, it appears to be the same no matter where you go...
regards
Scott
I wouldn't let anything disuade you <G>... Working traffic anywhere with some traffic is always FUN! It's just dealing with some of the office politics as well as some of the suits rules and other such things that gets to be a royal pain in the butt at times. From all of my travels, it appears to be the same no matter where you go...
regards
Scott
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting point about fines..
I believe the airport authority in JNB fines the airlines when they "block" stands due to missing pax etc.
Not sure what my lot will say to BAA, but I hope big airways said something.
Can only sympathise with all of you at LHR, I asked a question about staffing problems, a while ago and was surprised to find it had not been sorted.
We find it hard enough to convince people to travel at the moment, last thing we need is short sighted managers making it even harder by not keeping the correct staff levels.
Best of luck.
FPC
Not sure what my lot will say to BAA, but I hope big airways said something.
Can only sympathise with all of you at LHR, I asked a question about staffing problems, a while ago and was surprised to find it had not been sorted.
We find it hard enough to convince people to travel at the moment, last thing we need is short sighted managers making it even harder by not keeping the correct staff levels.
Best of luck.
FPC
Just do the job Ohcirrej
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmmmm.....just do the job. I'm sure Johnny Self-Load appreciates this ethos when positions combined and sectors closed causing him to be late for his connection or cause Mrs. Johnny to have to wait in the Terminal cause Mr. Johnny has been holding nearly 40 mins due staffing problems.
Hands up all those Tower Guys and EGLL Approach guys that got on with the job on this day (and other days like it!) And let's include every other NATS ATCO that turns up and has situations like this thrust upon them AND just does the job.
I think somebody missed the point on this one.........
Hands up all those Tower Guys and EGLL Approach guys that got on with the job on this day (and other days like it!) And let's include every other NATS ATCO that turns up and has situations like this thrust upon them AND just does the job.
I think somebody missed the point on this one.........
Last edited by Jerricho; 26th Jun 2003 at 05:28.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jerricho
Amen to that. Boo hoo to all those military controllers with their inordinately large pensions. They can all get off their high horses because, unles I'm very much mistaken, national service ain't compulsory you have to VOLUNTEER.
P7
Amen to that. Boo hoo to all those military controllers with their inordinately large pensions. They can all get off their high horses because, unles I'm very much mistaken, national service ain't compulsory you have to VOLUNTEER.
P7
Ohcirrej
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And just as a continuance from you P7 (gotta stop agreeing with each other, people will talk), before anybody starts waving the "you "voluenteered" in chosing to become an ATCO" flag.
Support from powers that be, in situations where their front liners are required to provide excuses is non existant. As I mentioned, if a pilot ask me "What's the reson for the delay?" I'm going to tell them EXACTLY why. And then, as has been addressed many time before (as being thrashed in the Bondage thread), management happily take their salaries that are far and above the Sector Driver, as well as bonuses for whatever the excuse for it is this week. All the while, their excellent management decisions leave the controller open to criticism and derision.
Remember those mugs they had at LTCC when New Horizions was the buzzword of the week. Seem to remember comments like "service must be the best", "people are the kay to success" and my 2 favorites "leadership" and "right climate to contribute". Crap.................................
(Ok, I'll admit it, I've got one on the desk here in front of me. Makes a great ash-tray!)
Support from powers that be, in situations where their front liners are required to provide excuses is non existant. As I mentioned, if a pilot ask me "What's the reson for the delay?" I'm going to tell them EXACTLY why. And then, as has been addressed many time before (as being thrashed in the Bondage thread), management happily take their salaries that are far and above the Sector Driver, as well as bonuses for whatever the excuse for it is this week. All the while, their excellent management decisions leave the controller open to criticism and derision.
Remember those mugs they had at LTCC when New Horizions was the buzzword of the week. Seem to remember comments like "service must be the best", "people are the kay to success" and my 2 favorites "leadership" and "right climate to contribute". Crap.................................
(Ok, I'll admit it, I've got one on the desk here in front of me. Makes a great ash-tray!)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why should NATS be any different to any other large organisation in the UK. Indifferent and/or incompentant management paying themselves bonuses for "targets reached", while paying lip service to employee participation whilst the "workers" take all the flak, and/or have their terms and conditions changed and pensions stolen.
One more thing!. NATS are apparently "World leaders in Air Traffic Management" how do you quantify that?, bearing in mind six years delay to Swanwick, extensive delays, lack of trained staff, the debacle to McNERC, transfer of Manchester ACC (maybe?).
If NATS does have an excellent reputation it is due to the professionalism, commitment, and dedication of its staff, not to its management. I wonder if its a case of if you say it often and loud enough eventually you will be believed.
One more thing!. NATS are apparently "World leaders in Air Traffic Management" how do you quantify that?, bearing in mind six years delay to Swanwick, extensive delays, lack of trained staff, the debacle to McNERC, transfer of Manchester ACC (maybe?).
If NATS does have an excellent reputation it is due to the professionalism, commitment, and dedication of its staff, not to its management. I wonder if its a case of if you say it often and loud enough eventually you will be believed.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: oxford
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Point Seven and Jerricho
Jerricho mentions early in the thread that AVAs are not desirable and this is echoed by other contributors.
Dan Dare says that it may only be a short time before Civil ATCOs are expected to attend extra days at work for a small increase in salary.
My point is that AVAs are not available to us so we have to just get on with it. Dan Dare - for the last few years, controllers where I work have been required to cover shifts on their days off without overtime pay or time off in lieu.
We try not to get overloaded by anticipating the problem and solving it in advance. Jerricho, I understand that the odd delay in leaving work may occure.
Point Seven - shame on you. Although I am approaching the end of my service and I should be checking up on the details of my pension, I have always been under the impression that the pension is somewhat based on salary levels- please feel free to correct me if I am wrong. It is no secret that a Civil ATCO's pay is far in excess of that of a Military ATCO's pay.
And yes, you are quite right, we are volunteers, and I am proud to have served my Queen and your country for the past 32 years.
Jerricho mentions early in the thread that AVAs are not desirable and this is echoed by other contributors.
Dan Dare says that it may only be a short time before Civil ATCOs are expected to attend extra days at work for a small increase in salary.
My point is that AVAs are not available to us so we have to just get on with it. Dan Dare - for the last few years, controllers where I work have been required to cover shifts on their days off without overtime pay or time off in lieu.
We try not to get overloaded by anticipating the problem and solving it in advance. Jerricho, I understand that the odd delay in leaving work may occure.
Point Seven - shame on you. Although I am approaching the end of my service and I should be checking up on the details of my pension, I have always been under the impression that the pension is somewhat based on salary levels- please feel free to correct me if I am wrong. It is no secret that a Civil ATCO's pay is far in excess of that of a Military ATCO's pay.
And yes, you are quite right, we are volunteers, and I am proud to have served my Queen and your country for the past 32 years.
Ohcirrej
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hang on a tick Mooney, can you explain something about your comment "the odd delay leaving work may occur". If you're implying that I feel the reason we need a FULL staff complement is simply to get out the door early, then you're here, and the point is WAY over there. As many will tell you at TC, I am normally one of the first in and very often the last out the door. While getting the early go is a nice thing, it is a bonus, not a right. If I'm rostered 2-10pm that's my shift.
You mention AVA's are not "available" for yourselves. As I don't know this one, do you guys have the correct number of staff, or close to? And saying "just get on with it"............shame on you. WE DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You mention AVA's are not "available" for yourselves. As I don't know this one, do you guys have the correct number of staff, or close to? And saying "just get on with it"............shame on you. WE DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
moony
Yes, we do get paid more. So why not bypass the mil and just do Civil? Because you wanted to do military controlling for all of the benefits that you get for being in the military and because you like the lifestyle. Fair do's. But don't go on about how you "get on with it", it means nowt to us. There are laws and rules put in place so that civil ATCOs are protected from "having to get on with it". As far as I'm concerned it's a stupid outdated ideal that has no place in the busy, safety conscious environment of civil ATC. We are entrusted with the safety of the lives of countless air travellers per year who, I don't think, would be too happy if they thought that we were cutting corners just to keep a stiff upper lip.
We have to fight to get our correct staff numbers, so that we don't shafted by our management into doing exactly what you're promoting. Well done to you for getting on with it, but we don't have to and as such, we aren't impressed by your martyrdom.
P7
Yes, we do get paid more. So why not bypass the mil and just do Civil? Because you wanted to do military controlling for all of the benefits that you get for being in the military and because you like the lifestyle. Fair do's. But don't go on about how you "get on with it", it means nowt to us. There are laws and rules put in place so that civil ATCOs are protected from "having to get on with it". As far as I'm concerned it's a stupid outdated ideal that has no place in the busy, safety conscious environment of civil ATC. We are entrusted with the safety of the lives of countless air travellers per year who, I don't think, would be too happy if they thought that we were cutting corners just to keep a stiff upper lip.
We have to fight to get our correct staff numbers, so that we don't shafted by our management into doing exactly what you're promoting. Well done to you for getting on with it, but we don't have to and as such, we aren't impressed by your martyrdom.
P7