Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Go-arounds to be scrapped at LHR

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Go-arounds to be scrapped at LHR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th May 2003, 22:25
  #1 (permalink)  
GT3
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go-arounds to be scrapped at LHR

The BBC made us aware last night go-arounds are a very risky business and with that in mind they are no longer to be practiced at LHR.

To prevent the possiblity of a mid-air collision over london, all aircraft WILL land no matter what the circumsances eg. many other planes on the runway/broken down tug on runway/escaped animals running wildly around LHR as if its the serenghetii.

We hope this instills confidence in a clearly unsafe pastime.
GT3 is offline  
Old 14th May 2003, 22:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now if the tower controllers worked a bit harder at getting the planes off the runway, there'd be no need for go arounds
vertigo is offline  
Old 14th May 2003, 23:24
  #3 (permalink)  
GT3
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
now theres a thought
GT3 is offline  
Old 15th May 2003, 01:45
  #4 (permalink)  
ZRH
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the CIR
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or you could make the spacing between traffic on final sooo big that they wouldn't have to go-around, but rather "re-position"
ZRH is offline  
Old 15th May 2003, 04:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,346
Received 22 Likes on 11 Posts
Why not cut out the middle men and let the BBC take over LHR?
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 15th May 2003, 05:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 543
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wink

Too many luvvies, saying can we do that again Captain, & would that count as a go around?
Trinity 09L is offline  
Old 16th May 2003, 01:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GT3

If go arounds are to be outlawed, then doesn't that put you out of a job?!
Point Seven is offline  
Old 16th May 2003, 02:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 35,000ft
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets get the terminolgy right "luvvies" are actors who are too thick to think for themselves and read other peoples scripts.

Journalists write the words for documentaries and the actors, they know nothing about the subject and can make the opening of a can of beans an international crisis and disaster.

Researchers feed the journalists a brief story line gleaned from someone who was almost there when the beans were opened but heard about it from someone who heard about it from a checkout girl in the supermarket
Vizsla is offline  
Old 16th May 2003, 02:44
  #9 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And you P7......but then again, you're so damn lazy, you wouldn't get out of your own way!!! *gasp*

"YUKON HO.................................."

Jerricho is offline  
Old 16th May 2003, 21:46
  #10 (permalink)  
GT3
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If go arounds are to be outlawed, then doesn't that put you out of a job?!
Doh! better get down the job centre i hear that ann summers are looking for people - know anyone with such experience
GT3 is offline  
Old 17th May 2003, 01:00
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: London, England
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, its another spectacularly inane thread......... That doesn't happen all the time.... Can we not go back to debating about where my £15K is??
halo is offline  
Old 17th May 2003, 18:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blimey.. I thought go-arounds were a thing of the past since I retired? Long ago there was a real frightener developing on 28R (not the numbers) with only 50/50 chance of a departure beating a landing Vanguard. Vanguard, looking down at the dep rolling underneath him says: "What happens if I overshoot ?" Air man says: "You're not cleared to overshoot" so he landed! (Sorry for stone age phraseology)

Bren M
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 17th May 2003, 18:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Asgard
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow Director:

I remember an Aeroflot TU104 (remember them?) being told to overshoot (much nicer phraseology) to which the pilot replied:

"Negative, I am committed"
Loki is offline  
Old 17th May 2003, 18:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't they take 30 seconds to spool up to full power? Nice!
Gonzo is offline  
Old 17th May 2003, 18:53
  #15 (permalink)  
Warped Factor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Told an Iberia to go-around once from short final on 27R one dark and stormy night.

Didn't surprise me when he just ignored what I had to say and landed anyway

WF.
 
Old 17th May 2003, 20:22
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same thing happened to me, same circumstances, same airline.

Going back to the Vanguard/Viscount, we were chatting at work yesterday and someone was recounting the tale of when a Trident was launched wheels up following a Viscount, and the Deps controller realised his error, came up on the R/T to the Viscount, just as if it was on the ground at the holding point: "xxx, pull over to the right, there's one to overtake you." He did, and it did!

Gonzo.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 17th May 2003, 21:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems NO-ONE does what you tell them to......that (in the opinion of programme makers) you are dangerous...and yet you STILL want an extra 15k?



TONGUE SERIOUSLY IN CHEEK!!
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 18th May 2003, 00:36
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chilly Jocko Land
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

30 secs for a Tu 104 gonzo ? That's for wimps - try an Il76 who lines up , saying "we need three minutes to run engines up to temperature and pressure !" ;-)
geezer is offline  
Old 18th May 2003, 01:15
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gonzo.. I think that's actually where the front one was a Bristol Freighter (Bristol Frightener). JK could probably explain!!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 18th May 2003, 01:44
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

As a frequent flyer I did not find the BBC programme
alarming as it was clearly a drama and not based on
facts, but from some of the incidents you are talking
about here I wonder when TCAS becomes operational.
If it doesn't work on taxiing to holding point, what height
or when does it come into effect?
barleymow is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.