Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Is anyone still using one of these headsets?

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Is anyone still using one of these headsets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Dec 2022, 20:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Is anyone still using one of these headsets?


In the UK, probably not very likely given the dominance of Sennheiser and Airlite 100s these days. Incidentally, this is my own, customised with red GPO cable and very fetching cloth covers. I don't suppose NATS or other ATC units had them quite like this!
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2022, 20:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond N Yorks
Posts: 202
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I have one in my understairs cupboard somewhere. I saved it when we changes to a digital system. The new system was much better, allowed me to continue when my hearing was failing. But I couldn't be without my old friend af some 30yrs!!!


Last edited by Get me some traffic; 19th Dec 2022 at 20:19. Reason: Not finished.
Get me some traffic is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2022, 20:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 687
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Liked them - they were always very robust unlike our newer ones which were never ATCO-proofed and sometimes only seem to last a few weeks.
Dan Dare is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2022, 21:03
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Yes, the good old Amplivox or Racal Astrolite. I know they haven't been made for at least a decade but they were in production for what seemed like forever. Not cheap but robust, about a dozen different configurations and relatively easy to service and repair. They had them in the control tower at LBA for about thirty years.

This is one of three new-old-stock units I've recently acquired. Racal label still attached. They came with NATO stock numbers so probably destined for the RAF.

Last edited by Mooncrest; 19th Dec 2022 at 21:14.
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2022, 17:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Urgh. Hated those.

Couldn't wear one for more than 30 mins before it became painful. The Astrolite with the larger padding was better, but nothing is as comfortable as the Sennheiser (HMD-46 (soon to be HME-46)) to wear (I have spectacles).
Gonzo is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2022, 04:01
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
The HMD and HME seem to have taken over now. I have some of the bigger Astrolite earpads but I thought they looked a bit weird, which I suppose isn't as important as comfort.
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2023, 18:58
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We had Astrolites at 'CC, both in the tower and the centre. I had the thinner castellated ear-pads with cloth or tissue 'muffs' and never had a problem, even as a spectacle-wearer. I couldn't thad the thick ear-pads. Several colleagues had sealed ear pads which were like being underwater. It was almost impossible to hear conversations on adjacent sectors. When the unit split into TWR/APP and Area, the aerodrome side got some really rubbish kit, and one pilot asked why tower/approach sounded like the 'medium wave'. The Sennheisers were lighter, but the sound quality was nowhere near as good.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2023, 09:24
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Sennheiser don't offer ventilated earpads with any of their headsets - it might just have been a Racal thing. I actually fitted a pair of scrap Sennheiser earphone speakers to an Astrolite and the sound quality is much the same as with regular Racal parts. The fact that the donor Sennheiser set was in a state beyond repair speaks volumes for their longevity and robustness (or rather lack thereof)!

I think all CAA/NATS units used Astrolites, plus some other airfields (LBA and BRS). Everywhere else seemed to go for the Airlite 62, twice as heavy but half the price. And still in production.
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2023, 13:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We used Jetlite RA112s before switching to Sennheiser
Gonzo is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2023, 17:47
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I also have one or two Jetlites. Identical components to the Astrolite, fitted to a very lightweight but not as tough headband and boom rassembly rehashed from a few decades earlier. Known to suffer from insulation parting company with the earpads and downleads! Not Racal's finest hour.
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2023, 05:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice ... there was also a later version with a smaller mic and thicker padding on the headband
poppiholla is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2023, 07:36
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by poppiholla
nice ... there was also a later version with a smaller mic and thicker padding on the headband
That version was fitted with an electret microphone which was tiny and only needed a small housing. They were used at LATCC but I don't think the NATS airports got them. The bigger microphone in my pictures is a magnetic-dynamic type, producing quite trebly and nasally speech with a basic tape recorder but perfect for radio and telephone systems of the time. It would be interesting to see how well the Astrolite would perform with modern ATC communications systems.
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2023, 13:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Home
Posts: 118
Received 28 Likes on 6 Posts
I don't suppose NATS or other ATC units had them quite like this!
Used them many years ago and found them functional and pretty robust. Engineers seemed to like because they could be easily repaired when necessary. The fetching, or otherwise, knickers were seen by some as not just a quick way to identify one's own headset but also a fashion statement. Personally, mine took on the 100-wash grey very soon after I got a new pair, and stayed that way until some new ones got ordered.

Don't use a headset professionally these days but modern ones may be a bit more comfortable - but not always - but rather flimsy and not inspiring confidence that it will work at that moment when you really need it to. But I'm clearly a luddite, I can recall the days of RDCE in NATS (at airports) and every 'advance' since then seems to have been a backward step from the users' perspective! I wonder whether it's an age thing, and whether younger people don't find some of these advances as much a hindrance as a benefit but I guess we can't stop progress .

​​​​​​​PS - apologies for the rambling thread drift.
Equivocal is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2023, 10:16
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
RDCE was in use at LBA until 2005. Not the NATS - designed stuff but a home-grown system using the same sort of panels and switches. That system lasted 28 years, was replaced by Schmid gear in 2005 and this in turn only managed 16 years before Frequentis came along. Sometimes, the old-school British stuff really is the best!
Mooncrest is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.