Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

CAT I approach during LVO

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

CAT I approach during LVO

Old 11th Feb 2021, 08:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Meteorology Avenue 17
Age: 41
Posts: 185
CAT I approach during LVO

Let's assume you're approaching in CAT II wx (EASA airport LVO in force), but suddenly found that the tail wind is out of limitation and decided to ask for opposite rwy which has only CAT I but with prevailing good weather. You request ATC for the opposite rwy but got denied stating that once the airport has LVO/LVP in force you can fly only CAT II/III approaches. Is that legal? Will appreciate for any ICAO or EASA reference.
maximus610 is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 15:08
  #2 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wherever I lay my hat
Age: 43
Posts: 569
I would question why they're landing LVOs with a tailwind when the other end is Cat 1... Has this actually happened?
rudestuff is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 15:46
  #3 (permalink)  
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 631
I can think of all sorts of scenarios that could lead to the choice of Cat 1 in to wind or Cat 3 with a tailwind, so the premise of the question seems reasonable. Not being a pilot I can only guess, but neither approach sounds to be allowed under normal circumstances (exceed autoland tailwind limits or descend below Cat 1 minima) so I would expect you to divert unless an emergency compelled you to land. Once you call the emergency then you call the shots and you decide which rule you want to break. In the event that you request a runway change it could take a while to set everything up to open the opposite direction runway.
Dan Dare is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 16:17
  #4 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Joined 2005 was Alycidon
Posts: 1
An airfield can be in LVOps in CAT 1 conditions, so if a CAT 1 approach is available then it is legal. Sounds like a local restriction, in which case it's up to them if they decide to prohibit the CAT 1 approach having gone into LVOs.
D9009 is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2021, 19:43
  #5 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dorset
Posts: 75
I agree with D9009 as far as I recall going many years back when LVOps first were set out the procedure was commenced in order to protect the runway and landing aids etc for CAT 11/111. Nothing was done to dictate that CAT 1 was not permitted it was up to the crew to apply their minima for that. It just meant that if CAT 11 or 111 were undertaken then the safeguards for those approaches were in place.
oldandbald is online now  
Old 12th Feb 2021, 16:33
  #6 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the way to sea
Posts: 249
I've never denied anybody in flying whatever approach they want. ATCOs are not police to check what licence and approvals your aircraft and crew have. Flying is your responsibility. It was not legal from them to deny you an approach. Failed approach can always contiune into missed approach....
kontrolor is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2021, 13:13
  #7 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: England
Posts: 380
LVOs are normally instated before actually being required. It gets the extra measures in place so that there no delay when the rvr falls below Cat 1 minima. The relevance of LVOs is that you can not fly below CAT 1 without the measures being in place.
Capt Scribble is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2021, 16:59
  #8 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: EU
Posts: 495
Is the issue here not to do with the request being for the opposite runway? If I was flying to an airport with LVPs in force and a CATII/III approach, but the RVR was for example 1500m, I can't see any reason why they can or would stop you flying to CAT I mins, and frankly aside from keeping everyone in the loop there's not really reason to tell anyone anyway.

It's obviously different though if you are asking for the opposite runway, and I imagine there are various implications. I don't know if it's reasonable that an airport/ATCU might have procedures in place to say no ad-hoc runway changes during LVPs. I could definitely see a scenario if for example if it's somewhat busy and everyone else can land with the tailwind, and you want the whole operation swapped around for your approach. Depending on procedures, infrastructure, holding points etc this may just frankly not be reasonably possible without buggering up the entire thing.
OhNoCB is online now  
Old 15th Feb 2021, 08:40
  #9 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the way to sea
Posts: 249
it doesn't matter. As long as there is instrumental approach availible, it is all the same. cat i, ii or iii
kontrolor is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2021, 09:40
  #10 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting home
Age: 43
Posts: 3,296
If we re-phrased the answer from what may have actually happened:

It's denied, because once under LVP for one runway, approaches from the opposide side are dis allowed?
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2021, 17:17
  #11 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Home
Posts: 53
Technically, LVO is not put on for a runway, it's for the airport - tailored to protect whatever operations may go on in low visibilities.
Equivocal is online now  
Old 15th Feb 2021, 19:11
  #12 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,142
I think that FlightDetent was saying that part of the LVPs may have been a requirement to remain with only one runway in use.

2 s
2 sheds is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2021, 13:03
  #13 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the way to sea
Posts: 249
why would they be? Protected area arround LLZ is affected same way if you land from the other side....
kontrolor is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2021, 16:05
  #14 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting home
Age: 43
Posts: 3,296
I just thought that having aircraft land from the opposing sides of a single physical runway is not the most favourite ATC sport. On a busy airport, such are those where CATIII is justifiably installed.

Consequently once LVO is up and running for one side (the only equipped one), a pilot's request to shoot an approach against all the flow is expectedly answered with a polite suggestion to reconsider the idea.

Not to mention that even if approved and done, after vacation the aircraft might end up in a part of taxiway system that is not properly marked, equipped or approved for LVP OPS while they'd be in force. Lessons from Linate not to be forgotten https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linate_Airport_disaster.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2021, 12:16
  #15 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the way to sea
Posts: 249
it only means, when you clear someone on opposite RWY during LVP, that nobody can't be cleared to proceed on ILS for two reasons - LLZ signal is disturbed and of course, you don't want to have head-on traffic on ILS in case of MAP
kontrolor is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2021, 11:00
  #16 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SA
Age: 60
Posts: 356
I understand that selecting CAT II (or III) for one direction immediately de-selects the ILS for the reciprocal runway. Perhaps this is what the controller was referring to.
sunnySA is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2021, 12:04
  #17 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: England
Age: 58
Posts: 250
It is not just about approaches and departures. When LVOs are declared, then many airports have particular routings for aircraft on the ground with various runway entry and exit routes not being available as well as differing availability of taxiways and routings. Having an aircraft landing in the opposite direction will create havoc to the LVO ground operations, particularly if ground radar is not available.
Don Coyote is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.