Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

En-Route Seperation


Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

En-Route Seperation

Old 7th August 2017 | 19:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Wherever LNAV Goes...
En-Route Seperation

Just would like to ask what separation do ATC in Europe require at high levels if two aircraft are at the same Flight Level, Mach No. and are on the same route? I would also like to ask how you calculate what Mach No. to assign aircraft that are converging etc. Is is based on an ETA for a waypoint?

Many thanks!
JT8D-17 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2017 | 09:23
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: in a TCU
Normally 5NM, the Mach number technique is usually used to keep the separation between aircraft on the same route or before sequencing for descend/arrival, when you early detect a conflict between converging airplanes you act adjusting their course by meants of radar headings or direct to a waypoint.
blissbak is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2017 | 08:28
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 306
Likes: 2
From: Down South
It's 5nm, and the easiest way to calculate the Mach number to use it to ask the one in front what they're doing and tell them to fly that or greater and the one behind does that Mach number or less. That should hold the gap at what we want.

Experience will tell me before I even ask if it's q question worth asking. For example, I won't try and run a 737-300 in front of a 737-800/A319 unless I absolutely have to in the cruise as most 300 series don't want to go above .75 and the 800 will want to be about .78. In the descent I'd happily do it.

In the case where the back one doesn't want to go that slow or the front one doesn't want to that fast then we negotiate or different levels are used or a direct routing for one if they're splitting up later on or as a last resort radar headings.
The Many Tentacles is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2017 | 09:32
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
I've had 2 DC8s at M=0.82 about a mile apart at FL350.
They were handed over to me one on top of the other at 330 and 350, same route and destination, different airlines; the lower one asked for FL370 so with both pilot's consent, I cleared him for a VMC climbthrough.
chevvron is online now  
Reply
Old 9th August 2017 | 09:42
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 324
Likes: 1
From: Near VTUU or EGPX
Originally Posted by chevvron
I've had 2 DC8s at M=0.82 about a mile apart at FL350.
They were handed over to me one on top of the other at 330 and 350, same route and destination, different airlines; the lower one asked for FL370 so with both pilot's consent, I cleared him for a VMC climbthrough.
Can't do it now in the UK, FL100 or below only.
The Fat Controller is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2017 | 11:45
  #6 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Originally Posted by The Fat Controller
Can't do it now in the UK, FL100 or below only.
Not in Class C airspace above FL195?
chevvron is online now  
Reply
Old 9th August 2017 | 11:50
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 306
Likes: 2
From: Down South
Technically yes, but there's something in the MATS somewhere that prohibits it
The Many Tentacles is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2017 | 14:43
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 324
Likes: 1
From: Near VTUU or EGPX
From the latest CAP493 (MATS 1) . Section 1, Chapter 3

It surprised me too !

5C. VMC Climb and Descent
5C.1 Controllers may authorise an aircraft to climb or descend in VMC provided:
(1) the manoeuvre is restricted to Class D, E, F and G airspace at or below FL100;
(2) it is during the hours of daylight;
(3) the aircraft is flying in visual meteorological conditions;
(4) the pilot of the aircraft climbing or descending agrees to maintain his own separation
from other aircraft and the manoeuvre is agreed by the pilot of the other aircraft; and
(5) essential traffic information is given.
5C.2 The application of VMC climb and descent could result in TCAS RA being triggered.
Therefore, in Class D airspace when surveillance services are being provided, VMC climb
and descent shall only be used where authorised and in accordance with any conditions
specified in MATS Part 2.
The Fat Controller is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2017 | 15:36
  #9 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 309
Likes: 4
From: Living In The Past
I posted this in ATC Humour about 10 years ago, but I think it shows the danger inherent in VMC climb/descent .....

Many, many years ago, an Aer Lingus inbound Manch told Preston Airways he had the BEA aircraft opposite direction in sight and asked for descent maintaining VMC which was given. The BEA skipper said "Aer Lingus , how do you know the BEA aircraft you can see is me?". Quick as a flash, the Aer Lingus skipper said " BEA, how do you know the Aer Lingus that just descended through your level was me ?"
Eric T Cartman is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2017 | 16:19
  #10 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
From: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
TFC,

I wonder if the editor of MATS Pt.1 knows that Class F Airspace disappeared from U.K. FIRs about 2 years ago?
Interesting that it's still included.
ZOOKER is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2017 | 20:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Poland
Probably because these rules are straightforward copies of relevant ICAO 4444 paragraphs and it's easier just to keep them aligned.
samotnik is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.