Level Abeam
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Level Abeam
Hello all,
After flying overseas for many years many in the US, I've come back to EU flying and have encountered the slightly tricky UK ATC clearance of being on a radar heading and then "descend to FL xx be level abeam XYZ wpt"
I'm sure many aircraft FMS systems can cope with this easily but on my simple machine, if I'm not going to the wpt then VNAV isn't very useful, so we're left with swagging it, which feels a bit wrong and depending on the geometry is prone to error.
Just curious how other people manage this? Also, I can see now useful it is for a controller but just to raise the point that it's a bit of a tricky clearance for some less advanced aircraft!
Cheers
TDK
Former Blue Suit ATCO at LATCC many moons ago...
After flying overseas for many years many in the US, I've come back to EU flying and have encountered the slightly tricky UK ATC clearance of being on a radar heading and then "descend to FL xx be level abeam XYZ wpt"
I'm sure many aircraft FMS systems can cope with this easily but on my simple machine, if I'm not going to the wpt then VNAV isn't very useful, so we're left with swagging it, which feels a bit wrong and depending on the geometry is prone to error.
Just curious how other people manage this? Also, I can see now useful it is for a controller but just to raise the point that it's a bit of a tricky clearance for some less advanced aircraft!
Cheers
TDK
Former Blue Suit ATCO at LATCC many moons ago...
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Norrnally 'abeam beacons/waypoints' will be close enough to track to apply simple 1 in 3 to the abeam point and then a bit of TLAR. It cannot be that difficult to crack! Heavens, we even managed it BEFORE VNAV, you know.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand it can be tricky to plot a position abeam fix escpecially when you have nothing more than a basic analog instruments or no GNSS. If you think you are unable to conduct your descent as required by atc and may bust the level, you should just say "unable" - a word so rarely used by pilots yet so useful.
It is REALLY better to say "unable" than to make a good but failed effort.
It is REALLY better to say "unable" than to make a good but failed effort.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's easy
1) Input waypoint into GPS / FMS
2) Set VNAV to be level 5nm prior to waypoint (Your clearance will, 99.9% of the time want you level BY, not levelling at
3) Use computed TOD on FMS whilst still flying Heading
That's accurate enough from both an ATC and a flying point of view.
1) Input waypoint into GPS / FMS
2) Set VNAV to be level 5nm prior to waypoint (Your clearance will, 99.9% of the time want you level BY, not levelling at
3) Use computed TOD on FMS whilst still flying Heading
That's accurate enough from both an ATC and a flying point of view.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
when you have nothing more than a basic analog instruments or no GNSS
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting point raised by Chilli that is missed (from an understanding perspective) by most (if not all) pilots.
If ATC ask you to be level, for example FL270 BY RESNO, what they really want is you to be level 5 miles before that point.
That's about 40 seconds before you get there.
What this does for the controller is give the assurance that you will actually be level at the point and remove the need for any coordination (because 9 times out of 10 the LEVEL BY requirement is on a sector boundary).
What happens too often is a VNAV descent that the computer on board initiates as late as possible before the waypoint. This give ATC the heebyjeebys because it looks like you've forgotten to descend or will be too high.
In short - go down early. Wont kill you, since you dont really care what level you cross the point at do you?
If ATC ask you to be level, for example FL270 BY RESNO, what they really want is you to be level 5 miles before that point.
That's about 40 seconds before you get there.
What this does for the controller is give the assurance that you will actually be level at the point and remove the need for any coordination (because 9 times out of 10 the LEVEL BY requirement is on a sector boundary).
What happens too often is a VNAV descent that the computer on board initiates as late as possible before the waypoint. This give ATC the heebyjeebys because it looks like you've forgotten to descend or will be too high.
In short - go down early. Wont kill you, since you dont really care what level you cross the point at do you?
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Way north
Age: 47
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You could ask how many miles to the point and do the math, or request a rate of descend to be able to meet the restriction (not friendly to a busy controller, as he has to do the math), or even easier, ask for a time to be level before.
The last would give an answer like "be level before time xx" or "in xx minutes", then you should be able to calculate the rate of climb/descend yourself.
That's the really oldschool answers, if your flying without FMS and whatnot....
The last would give an answer like "be level before time xx" or "in xx minutes", then you should be able to calculate the rate of climb/descend yourself.
That's the really oldschool answers, if your flying without FMS and whatnot....
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the posts, will have a fiddle about with it all next time. Seem to always manage ok...
Thought we might avoid the sadly inevitable "back in the day we did this with a compass, stopwatch and candlelight brigade, but the temptation is too great for some people"!!!
Thought we might avoid the sadly inevitable "back in the day we did this with a compass, stopwatch and candlelight brigade, but the temptation is too great for some people"!!!
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Location
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If ATC ask you to be level, for example FL270 BY RESNO, what they really want is you to be level 5 miles before that point.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember a procedure being introduced for the interface between Manchester area sectors and Swanwick which involved parallel tracks with a/c on radar headings. The ops people came up with the splendid phraseology to be used......
"Climb FL190 to be level 10 miles before abeam Honiley".
I can't remember any of us ever saying that.
"Climb FL190 to be level 10 miles before abeam Honiley".
I can't remember any of us ever saying that.
Last edited by ZOOKER; 27th Nov 2014 at 22:22.
Plenty of rubbish FMSs out there that can't create abeam points. The UNS-1 comes to mind. You simply have to pick a vertical speed that looks about right and aim slightly on the conservative side in the more basic aircraft. If you are given a direct, keep the original routing in one of the FMS boxes to give you a reference for distance to the target point.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Samsonite Avenue
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The three times table for profile awareness and dividing your groundspeed by two and adding a zero at the end (or multiplying by five) to get your required rate of descent to make good the profile, always stood me in good stead on my last type when it came to descent planning.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southampton
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do think FinallyFlying makes a valid point - Although "level by . . . ." means exactly that I can't think of a colleague who would mind, or complain, if you levelled 1 or 2 miles early!!
I know it's slightly non-standard (and therefore must be frowned upon!) but i have sometimes used "be level at or before . . . . "
It does appear sometimes that, as said before
An aircraft descends at 3000fpm or more which will make the restriction with about 100yds to spare, then, of course reduces its descent rate, as it needs to level off, and misses the restriction by about 600ft or more!!
I know it's slightly non-standard (and therefore must be frowned upon!) but i have sometimes used "be level at or before . . . . "
It does appear sometimes that, as said before
What happens too often is a VNAV descent that the computer on board initiates as late as possible before the waypoint. This give ATC the heebyjeebys because it looks like you've forgotten to descend or will be too high.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about If you were on a STAR .....which included a level restriction
So same scenario....you are put on a heading.....my understanding is the level restriction still applies abeam the waypoint even though you are no longer flying the lateral STAR clearance?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.