Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Low F16 on Finals at Waddington Airshow

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Low F16 on Finals at Waddington Airshow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2014, 07:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,814
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
You guys obviously haven't seen videos of 747s landing at St Maarten if you think that was dicy.
At Halton in the mid 60s, people often used to park their cars in the undershoot of runway 02 when we were gliding. I have a memory of one approach I made in a Sedburgh where there were children sitting on the roof of a car and a man was snatching them off the roof as I passed over when landing. Some of the other guys would stuff the nose down for excess speed and descend low over the field across the road from the airfield, then pull up over the road to land. Funny how the local bus company would always switch to single deck buses in summer but would run double deckers for the rest of the year.
chevvron is online now  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 07:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
chevvron, as a Chesham local, do you remember the fatal accident at Bovingdon when an aircraft hit the Bovingdon-Chesham 316 bus at the 04 threshold? Traffic lights were installed after that, and I believe London Country switched to GS single-deckers. I remember seeing the aftermath but don't know what type of aircraft was involved. The bus might have been an RLH.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2014, 08:05
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 1,094
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
TDM

Malc, Didn't know you were a bus man too .
Brian 48nav is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2014, 08:19
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,814
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
An RLH is the 'low' double decker isn't it? As far as I'm aware, they were used mainly for the 336 Chesham - Watford service via Amersham.
I only remember travelling to my aunt's place (originally Bourne End, later Boxmoor) in single deck London Transport (green) buses or Rover coaches, I don't recall double deckers on this route.

Last edited by chevvron; 8th Jul 2014 at 14:31.
chevvron is online now  
Old 8th Jul 2014, 17:56
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Up There!!!
Age: 61
Posts: 439
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Another angle on that approach!

https://mobile.twitter.com/warrenadr...47490997817344
7of9 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2014, 09:24
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Age: 54
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Minesthechevy
Westlakes:

<<So under what legal power could the Police move folk from that area that is part of the public highway?>>

Many. Trust me on this.
Really? Do tell.


Posted from Pprune.org App for Android
Tashengurt is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2014, 11:44
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: That France
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Google is your friend.

However, start with the Public Order Act 1986, the RTA Acts (various), and Criminal Justice Act 1967.

I used to be quite involved in vehicular Rights of Way issues but moved out of the UK 8 years ago, so have not bothered updating my brain over these things.

Bottom line, if Plod wants you moved on or stopped, he'll find some law which gives him the excuse.
Minesthechevy is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2014, 14:00
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Age: 54
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Minesthechevy
Google is your friend.

However, start with the Public Order Act 1986, the RTA Acts (various), and Criminal Justice Act 1967.

I used to be quite involved in vehicular Rights of Way issues but moved out of the UK 8 years ago, so have not bothered updating my brain over these things.

Bottom line, if Plod wants you moved on or stopped, he'll find some law which gives him the excuse.
As a plod. No he won't. Not if wants to keep his job.


Posted from Pprune.org App for Android
Tashengurt is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2014, 17:25
  #29 (permalink)  
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On the western edge of The Moor
Age: 67
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bottom line, if Plod wants you moved on or stopped, he'll find some law which gives him the excuse.
As did many by using the Terrorism Act to prevent folk taking photos in public places, confiscation memory cards (or film) of getting shots deleted.
This sort of action leads to a invite to a no tea no biccies interview. as would trying to move the folk in the video, might get away with it for one or two, but that number would quickly lead to official action against any officer involved and 15 minutes of fame on Youtube
west lakes is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2014, 07:32
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: An Airport Near You
Posts: 673
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
he probably didn't know which one of the finals to use.
I wonder if he was low downwinds and base legs as well?
360BakTrak is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2014, 08:16
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll just quote myself from page 1 of this thread.

To start with the constable could start with simply ask them to move off the centreline using powers of persuasion (a cop can ask you to do pretty much anything they like without needing a legal power as you can choose to comply or refuse)


But if you're looking for offences or legislative powers then you can start with Actions endangering safety of aircraft (under ANO) for one (approach surface infringement which is a safety specification). Constables have power to use reasonable force to prevent the offence (i.e. move the people on)

For anyone between the hedgeline and the field boundary then they're on the highway (as the legal highway includes footpaths and verges) and must obey the directions of a constable to proceed in a particular direction.
And actually the posters further up were right - if a constable feels that they need you to do something then there is usually a law that allows them to do it. If there's a law that allows them to do it then they wont be losing their job.

And to the person above commenting on the overzealous use of S44 terrorism act against photographers - it didnt result in 'hats on no biccies' interviews it actually resulted in Parliament saying "it was too wide ranging" and they revoked it and brought in an amended version which tightened up the circumstances in which it could be used
Burnie5204 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2014, 13:27
  #32 (permalink)  
Fit like min?
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ...
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given he was the Solo Turk, am I allowed to say it looked like a close shave?
Richard Taylor is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2014, 16:57
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Mysterious East
Posts: 384
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got to agree with Tashengurt on that one.
LXGB is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2014, 18:31
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC News - RAF Waddington plane spotters get Typhoon shock
LTNman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.