Heading 090 DEGREES
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Heading 090 DEGREES
Given a radar heading.
Reply - Continue heading 090 DEGREES
Uk RT is for all headings ending in a 0, must have degrees after them spoken to avoid confusion. Is this applicable worldwide (bar USA) who do there own thing?
If so do you have a reference.
Thanks
Pin
Reply - Continue heading 090 DEGREES
Uk RT is for all headings ending in a 0, must have degrees after them spoken to avoid confusion. Is this applicable worldwide (bar USA) who do there own thing?
If so do you have a reference.
Thanks
Pin

Joined: Dec 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Hamburg
Appending the word 'degrees' to those heading figures where the heading ends in zero is not prescribed by ICAO. According to 5.2.1.4.1.1 of ICAO Annex 10, Volume II, a heading of 100 degrees is to be transmitted as 'heading one zero zero' and a heading of 080 degrees is to be transmitted as 'heading zero eight zero'.
The Manual of Radiotelephony (Doc 9432) goes even further and states in 3.1.3 of Chapter 3: 'The following words may be omitted from transmissions provided that no confusion or ambiguity will result: [...] b) "DEGREES" in relation to radar headings.'
The Manual of Radiotelephony (Doc 9432) goes even further and states in 3.1.3 of Chapter 3: 'The following words may be omitted from transmissions provided that no confusion or ambiguity will result: [...] b) "DEGREES" in relation to radar headings.'
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: UK
I think there was a change in the UK phraseology a while back which was designed to further reduce confusion by having the parameter plus the unit in case you don't hear one of them.
Climb Altitude six thousand feet. Descend Height one thousand feet. Turn right Heading Zero Nine Zero DEGREES. Set QNH Nine Nine Eight Hectopascals, Speed two two zero knots or less.
Climb Altitude six thousand feet. Descend Height one thousand feet. Turn right Heading Zero Nine Zero DEGREES. Set QNH Nine Nine Eight Hectopascals, Speed two two zero knots or less.

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 308
Likes: 6
From: etha
But in the CAP 413 examples for radar vectoring (Chapter 5, page 7), any example where the heading ends with a "0", degrees is also said, and those examples ending in "5" do not have degrees. I cannot find anywhere a sentence that specifies this!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: UK
But in the CAP 413 examples for radar vectoring (Chapter 5, page 7), any example where the heading ends with a "0", degrees is also said, and those examples ending in "5" do not have degrees. I cannot find anywhere a sentence that specifies this!
"For all transmissions, with the exception of those used for surveillance or precision radar approaches, “degrees” shall be appended to heading figures where the heading ends in zero, or in cases where confusion or ambiguity may result."

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 308
Likes: 6
From: etha
Pin Head - it is to distinguish from ALL flight levels AND headings ending in zero. Your post alludes to the use of wun hundred/two hundred degrees being permitted to be said just as, which is incorrect, "hundred" is not to be used when referring to a heading.
reportyourlevel, thanks for that. Your CAP493 reference no longer exists, Attachment/appendix E has been totally rewritten and all examples of phraseology removed, nothing in attachment/appendix E refers to headings and degrees. However, although again slightly changed, the CAP413 Chapter 3 page 1, and now para 3.3 does state exactly what you wrote, cheers.
reportyourlevel, thanks for that. Your CAP493 reference no longer exists, Attachment/appendix E has been totally rewritten and all examples of phraseology removed, nothing in attachment/appendix E refers to headings and degrees. However, although again slightly changed, the CAP413 Chapter 3 page 1, and now para 3.3 does state exactly what you wrote, cheers.

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 5
From: South of England
I think there was a change in the UK phraseology a while back which was designed to further reduce confusion by having the parameter plus the unit in case you don't hear one of them.
Climb Altitude six thousand feet. Descend Height one thousand feet. Turn right Heading Zero Nine Zero DEGREES. Set QNH Nine Nine Eight Hectopascals, Speed two two zero knots or less.
Climb Altitude six thousand feet. Descend Height one thousand feet. Turn right Heading Zero Nine Zero DEGREES. Set QNH Nine Nine Eight Hectopascals, Speed two two zero knots or less.
2 s



Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,448
Likes: 367
From: Wildest Surrey
The use of either a '5' at the end of a heading when radar vectoring or '0' followed by 'degrees' is what is known as 'best practice' phraseology in order to avoid a heading instruction being confused with a level change under 'high workload'.
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 1
From: On the wireless...
Originally Posted by 2 sheds
'best practice'

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 308
Likes: 6
From: etha
Best practice? Where does that come from? The book says "shall" use degrees following a heading ending in zero, which I believe is far more than just best practice, and certainly something a UCE should be picking up on.
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 1
From: On the wireless...
Just wait until you get a jobsworth UCE who pontificates that it's (his/her) 'best practice' to include units regardless ie. degrees for any heading, hectopascals for barometric settings 1000 hPa and above, and anything else about which he/she 'gets a feeling in the water'…etc...
…because they are out there…and should be reined in by CAA SARG...
…because they are out there…and should be reined in by CAA SARG...



