Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Flying at the Transition Level

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Flying at the Transition Level

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Feb 2013, 08:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: new york city
Age: 66
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying at the Transition Level

During our arrival into Frankfurt-Hahn airport (EDFH), the ATIS announced "Transition Level is six zero."

ATC cleared us to descend and maintain "Six thousand feet." Was this an error on their part?

We were subsequently given a lower altitude, and didn't have a chance to ask the controller.

I was prepared to enter the local altimeter setting in our altimeter, since he said "6000 feet." My F/O did not agree, and wanted to keep 1013.

Thanks in advance. Mike
76mike is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 10:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hahn is "TL by ATC." Normally they give you the altitude in feet followed by "on QNH xxxx. That is my cue.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 10:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm assuming that the Transition Altitude is 6000'. In this case there is no problem in using that level. Aircraft above will be dropped to the first separated FL above the Transition Level, in this case FL70. As you were given a descent to an "Altitude" you should've set the local QNH. Bit of an ambiguous call by ATC though, they should have said "Descend to Altitude 6000 feet"

Last edited by Glamdring; 21st Feb 2013 at 10:29.
Glamdring is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 10:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: The Pub
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both Glam and Marker are correct.
First altitude involving a change from a FL should be
"Descend to ALTITUDE xxxxfeet, QNH xxxx"
Belt and braces to change.
Reedback would also include both.
NotMeMate is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 11:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have seen a few loses of separation with people using 6000 ft altitude and FL70 when the pressure is low.I preferred 5000ft altitude and FL70 or FL80 if the pressure was very low.I don't believe saying altitude is a requirement in Doc4444.
throw a dyce is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 11:08
  #6 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Was it an error? All depends on the pressure....and whether both 6000ft and FL60 existed. I've never been any good at these altimetry questions - I'm sure you know if it's high or low pressure that will give you the right conditions for both FL60 and 6A to exist.

There's a second issue that varies between States of whether the Transition Layer is a minimum of 1000ft 'thick'. Some States have procedures that ensure any altitude allocated below the Transition Level will be separated from any FL that is allocated above - others do not.

I think the 'must say altitude' thing, although good practise, is a bit of a UK thing.
 
Old 21st Feb 2013, 11:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Euroland
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Glam, Transition altitude is 5000ft in Hahn. If QNH is 1013 or higher TL is FL60, if QNH is below 1013 TL is FL70.

I've had a few times Langen say explicitly "maintain altitude 6000ft I say again altitude 6000 due traffic descending above" on the departure or the other way around with maintaining a FL.

Last edited by Tom!; 21st Feb 2013 at 11:15.
Tom! is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 13:09
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In that case I wouldn't expect Altitude 6000 feet to be used as a matter of course. I can see situations where it might be used tactically though.

I've used Flight Levels myself below the TA when I can't be bothered doing the altimetry maths (Obviously terrain safe FLs I might add )

Last edited by Glamdring; 21st Feb 2013 at 13:10.
Glamdring is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 13:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: brasil
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation TA and TL in Germany

Transition altitude is 5000ft in Hahn. If QNH is 1013 or higher TL is FL60, if QNH is below 1013 TL is FL70
This is applicable for hall german airspace. You will not find an altitude
of 6000 ft on any ARR, DEP or APP chart. The TRANSITION layer is minimum 1000 ft.
Generally altitute 6000 ft is not flown in Germany. So I would say if Hahn ATC cleared you to that altitude without further explanation, it was simply a mistake.
vaschandi is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 15:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Europe
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit of an ambiguous call by ATC though, they should have said "Descend to Altitude 6000 feet"

I don't think so...4444 do not say so either.
"6000 ft" is just enough of information. Pilot should obey ATC's instructions in such case, confirmation is an option though. The reason for clearing to altitude instead of TL is unknown, but I wouldn't say it's a legal option.

Last edited by zoneman; 21st Feb 2013 at 15:12.
zoneman is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2013, 23:44
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: EGLL
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Transition level is the first available Flight Level above the TA. So if it is 6000' the TL could be FL65, 70, 75 etc depending on the QNH. However tho does not mean that an a/c cannot fly at 6000', 7000', 8000' etc. I' sure most of you guys understand altimetry but separation using QNH altitudes and Flight Levels is not difficult. As long as it's 1000' or greater. I've used altitudes well above the TA just to get the a/c in.
ILS 119.5 is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2013, 01:46
  #12 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Transition level is the first available Flight Level above the TA.
As I said before, the question sometimes is what available means. Is it the first FL that exists above the TA or it it the first one that is at least 1000ft above the TA??

Different countries apply different 'rules'. From Tom! and vaschandi's posts it seems that Germany use the latter interpretation. When I controlled in the UK years ago there was no 'rule' and even different units did it differently - one place I worked I would be in line for a real rollocking if I didn't keep 1000ft between alts and flight levels and at another all I had to do was keep the aeroplanes apart vertically by 1000ft. Like ILS, I occasionally used altitudes above the TA (along with a quick explanation to the crew) if it helped to sort out the traffic.

There's a third option that I have seen where TA is, say 10A and TL is FL120 and no-one needs to worry about about working out what FL can be used unless the pressure is unusually extreme. Personally, I don't much like that system because most of the time you unnecessarily lose at least one level and because people don't usually have to worry about what the pressure is, they can easily not remember to do so when it is necessary.
 
Old 27th Feb 2013, 12:17
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamburg
Age: 46
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike,

I think you were right and your F/O was wrong. As you say, ATC cleared you to an altitude of 6000 feet. I did my instrument flight training in northern Germany and we were regularly cleared to altitudes, even when above the transition altitude. I hope I can help by quoting the relevant rules below.

If the level of an aircraft is reported in relation to the standard atmospheric pressure 1013.2 hPa, the words FLIGHT LEVEL shall precede the level value. If the level of the aircraft is reported in relation to QNH / QFE, the level value shall be followed by the word FEET. (AIP Germany, GEN 3.4-11)

IFR flights shall be conducted in compliance with semi-circular cruising levels (Attachment 3), unless in climb or descent, at the flight level or altitude corresponding to the magnetic track. The [...] air navigation service provider may grant exemptions in individual cases [...]. (Section 37, Paragraph 3 of the German Aviation Regulation, published in AIP Germany, ENR 1.1-24. Italics added.)
hvogt is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2013, 12:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: EGLL
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the TA is 5000' then the first available level is FL55 but could be FL60, but dependent on pressure. It would be unlikely for an atco to use 55 because after that it will be 65, 75, etc. and then to get back to normal levels you would have to use 90, 100 etc, so somewhere you will lose 500'. So std operating would be TA 5000' QNH 1000 hpa or below lowest FL70, QNH above 1000 hpa, lowest FL60. Technically if all a/c are on the same pressure setting either QFE, QNH, 1013, then separation would be easier unfortunately we have to use different pressure settings due aerodrome elevation (QFE, for GA and RAF), terrain and obstacle clearance (QNH) and FL for everyone who is safe from terrain. So wherever you are there are calculations to be done. (normally by the computer)

76mike, what was the qnh at the time. If the atco said 6000' i would question it, as the first descent to an altitude you must be given the qnh, its in the book. Also where were you at the time the descent was given, as I remember all the departure SID's go to FL60, and if you were on the transition downwind abeam the field FL70 is adequate for a 3 deg glide path descent profile (continuous, or as near as)

Last edited by ILS 119.5; 27th Feb 2013 at 12:36.
ILS 119.5 is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2013, 19:57
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Europe
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ILS119.5 , wouln'd you put 1012hPa instead of 1000hPa in:
"So std operating would be TA 5000' QNH 1000 hpa or below lowest FL70, QNH above 1000 hpa, lowest FL60."
We just need to gain 1000ft above TA for separation purposes, and it is 1000ft when QNH is 1013. If it drops below we need to use higher FL, if it's above 1013 we get some extra ft.
Mixed use of alt and FL could be treated as a serious safety issue...with all respect to UK guys.
zoneman is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2013, 07:45
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 759
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
IIRC I was taught to never fly at either the TL or TA as the separation between the two was never more than 500' ... but that was well before we went hectopascalling.
FantomZorbin is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2013, 12:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Landvetter, Sweden
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TA vs TL

TA is set by the CAA in the country and itīs fixed, e.g. 5.0ft.
TL fluctuates with the air pressure and temperature. In some countries there is a built in separation between TA and TL and in other countries it's not.
In the US there is another solution. 18.0ft is TA and F200 is TL just to make it easier. By doing the US solution you lose a level.

In countries where there is no built-in separation the controllers have to think by themselves where there is separation. To make it simple and safe you regard the TA and the TL as the same level for separation purposes e.g. TA 5.0ft and TL55. That means that 5.0ft is the same as level F55. Then you descend the arriving aircraft to F70. You could descend to F65 but you select a level that ends with a 0, just to make it more simple.

I hope this makes it perfectly clear to all and everyone.
2control is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2013, 13:36
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't make much sense to me 2control....

"TA is set by the CAA in the country and itīs fixed, e.g. 5.0ft."

I think you mean "e.g. 5000 ft". "5.0ft" is just five feet.

And FantomZorbin.... hectopascals are precisely the same as millibars so have no bearing on the current discussion.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2013, 13:49
  #19 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
2control...wow! How could I have gone through life for so long without understanding such a simple thing the way that you do?

And having the the gift to explain it so simply.

Oh, hang on a minute, um....so, let me get this right.....TA and the TL as the same level for separation purposes.....

I must have done it wrong every working day for 20+ years!
 
Old 6th Mar 2013, 15:09
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: EGLL
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't remember but doesn't 50 indicate fl50 and 5.0 or A5.0 indicate 5000' altitude on the strips. To be truthful I not bothered if flying on qnh at an altitude above the ta providing I'm 1000' vertically separated from any other a/c, or 3/5 miles laterally and I don't mean three fifths.
Technically you could fly at a FL below the TA and still be above the MSA within the MRVA, I know this is never done but theoretically it could be.
H.D. You are correct in what you state by saying that the TA is set by the CAA for that country and "fixed", but only fixed for a certain area of the country and can vary from area to area. Whereas the USA and Canada it is fixed for all of the states at the same value of 18000'.
Confusing things more:-
UK TMA Controller:- "USA XXX descend altitude 5000' QNH 1015"
"Err London, USA XXX can we have that in inches"
"Affirm USA XXX descend altitude 60000 inches QNH 1015"
ILS 119.5 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.