Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Cost of Fuel Burnt

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Cost of Fuel Burnt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th September 2012 | 02:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: malaysia
Cost of Fuel Burnt

Hi Aviators..do airlines have a record of the amount
of fuel burnt due to ATC reasons such as holding etc.
Do you fill in a voyage report which the company
takes into account of the fuel burnt due to delays
by atc? Would like to know if such a statistic exists.
Thanks in advance.
veloo maniam is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2012 | 07:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,562
Likes: 33
From: I wouldn't know.
In my outfit we do have a statistic about how much delay due to ATC we have. It is in minutes per year. Since we know how fuel we burn per average minute it is quite easy to get extra fuel burned due to ATC delay. Additionally we fill in ACARS reports whenever we do not get the filed flight level, get a very early descent clearance and so on. So fuel burned due to ATC is something quite often used in political debates for example about a faster implementation of a true single european sky. The current status quo costs a lot of money, for no good reason at all.

Last edited by Denti; 14th September 2012 at 07:06.
Denti is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2012 | 07:11
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 538
Likes: 1
From: Oz
I think you will find most "ATC delays" are caused by airlines scheduling multiple flights to arrive and depart at the same time.
topdrop is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2012 | 08:03
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,718
Likes: 2,084
From: Reading, UK
I think you will find most "ATC delays" are caused by airlines scheduling multiple flights to arrive and depart at the same time.
Quite so. That's a scandalous practice, and should be stopped.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2012 | 09:57
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: South EU
... and most of the time, requesting the same FL´s ...
Lssar is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2012 | 10:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Yes, I'm not sure if it should be put the in "ATC Delays" column, or "ATC Keeping Us Alive For The Cost Of A Little Extra Fuel" column at budget time.

I mean, really??!
kiwi chick is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2012 | 12:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Southampton
Quite bl@@dy so!

How often have us ATCOs sat on a plane and heard the current delay is 'due to Air Traffic Control'?!?

Is it that there are too may chuffing aircraft arriving at this particular time who all want to land on the same piece of black-top, or that 26 aircraft are ready to depart at the same time from a similar piece. These are not ATC delays, these are Air Traffic Delays! So please think twice before you blame those whose job (as Kiwi Girl suggests) is to keep you all safely separated.

Similarly if the poor bod in front blocks the runway or bad weather increases the gaps on final approach - to maintain a safe operation. Again, not ATC delays.

There ARE some ATC delays, when sickness causes below normal staffing for example, but the broad brush blame game is not reasonable. On at least half a dozen occasions I have challenged the reason for our delay, for it to be clarified as non-ATC related. To be fair on several of these occasions the pilots have PA'd with a more accurate reason!

Safe flying...

Last edited by Cartman's Twin; 14th September 2012 at 12:55.
Cartman's Twin is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2012 | 13:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: F370
At our company we assign time delays to various causes, including ATC. That could be waiting for clearance before start. The fuel burn is just the cost of doing business, and the company doesn't assign blame.

Joe
AtoBsafely is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2012 | 14:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: In t'sky
Cartman's Twin,

Nothing would give me better pleasure than to state clearly on the PA "Apologies for the delay, this is due to the scheduling of an inadequate amount of time to achieve a safe turnaround", however we might lose our jobs

I normally blame the weather, even if it's CAVOK.
MrHorgy is offline  
Reply
Old 15th September 2012 | 13:27
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Southampton
Go on Horgy, do it for the team! Maybe on your last day........
Cartman's Twin is offline  
Reply
Old 15th September 2012 | 13:49
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: The Netherlands
Is there also a column on this chart for ATC savings? For when you get a direct route
millerman is offline  
Reply
Old 15th September 2012 | 18:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: England
Some years back, a pilot in a passenger carrying 737 received a Radar Advisory Service (at his own request) from me at a unit using raw radar AR1 equipment.

After a couple of "Avoiding action, turn right heading 120, traffic was 12 O'clock, range 5 miles, height unknown" type transmissions to cater for unknown "pop-ups", he asked me if I had any idea what this was costing his company in fuel.

When I replied that I didn't, I also asked him to confirm what service he was requesting. He confirmed RAS, so I continued with more of the same. In return, he complained again and eventually requested a Radar Information Service. Some days, a controller can't win.
P6 Driver is offline  
Reply
Old 16th September 2012 | 09:34
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: The South
@millerman Directs - most of the time there's not even a 'thank you'...
Rossoneri is offline  
Reply
Old 16th September 2012 | 12:41
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: In t'sky
Cartman,

Legend has it, one particular Captain here picks up the PA upon arrival and rather than the traditional "Welcome to XXX Cabin Crew disarm doors" simply states..

"Ladies and Gentlemen, O'Leary has your money now f*** off!"
MrHorgy is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2012 | 06:48
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: malaysia
Cost of fuel burnt

Coral...one of the best replies...I presume it should read as "get rid of atc.."
veloo maniam is offline  
Reply
Old 26th September 2012 | 06:21
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Northwich
IATA delay codes starting with 8 come under the heading of ATC (even though some are clearly nothing to do with ATC). It is often not clear why a delay is caused and there is much inaccurate reporting as a result. Having been exposed to the Spanish work to rule for some time now it just highlights how flexible and accommodating our Northern Europe ATC units are. So Rossoneri "Thank you" from all of us.

81: ATC restriction en-route or capacity
82: ATC restriction due to staff shortage or equipment failure en-route
83: ATC restriction at destination
84: ATC restriction due to weather at destination
85: Mandatory security
86: Immigration, Customs, Health
87: Airport Facilities, parking stands, ramp congestion, buildings, gate limitations, ...
88: Restrictions at airport of destination, airport/runway closed due obstruction, industrial action, staff shortage, political unrest, noise abatement, night curfew, special flights, ...
89: Restrictions at airport of departure, airport/runway closed due obstruction, industrial action, staff shortage, political unrest, noise abatement, night curfew, special flights, start-up and pushback, ...

Last edited by alosaurus; 26th September 2012 at 06:22. Reason: IATA codes added
alosaurus is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.