Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

heathrow approach stack question

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

heathrow approach stack question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jul 2012, 05:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Joburg
Age: 70
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question heathrow approach stack question

Aircraft from the Ockham stack generally peel off and approach the field from the south. Occasionally though, esecially during the 6am rush, they peel off and fly north over the field and join the approach from the north, fitting in between LAM and BOV arrivals. Interested to hear if there is a "rule" as to when this is done, or is it based on the landing runway.
Tks

Last edited by starliner; 30th Jul 2012 at 05:56.
starliner is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2012, 07:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is totally at the discretion of the Heathrow Number 1 Director (The Master Director if it is 'split' No.1 N and No. 1 South). The vectoring to the landing runway includes both right and left-hand circuits and if spare capacity is identified in the opposite circuit then an aircraft may, subject to mutual agreement, be taken 'over the top'. It is often an option if there are 'too many off the stack'. The only constraint is that the aircraft must remain within the joint radar vectoring area. The Number 2 (Final) Director isn't bothered which side they appear from as long as they are sensibly spaced for the base turn. Certain ATCOs favour its use more than others when under pressure. Colloquially known as 'Over the top' meaning over the top of the Final Approach sequence hence the initial descent from minimum stack level to (say) only 5000'. It happens occasionally off BNN too then they are taken left-hand. The Radar Directors are mentally 'counting' the track distance all the time for 'Continuous Descent Approaches' and the 'Over the Top' is yet another path-stretching 'tool in the bag' along with 'orbits' and 'once more around the hold'. It can also happen on easterlies as well but much more rarely as there is greater room to maneuver in the first place.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2012, 10:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sometimes to reduce airbourne delays they choose the odd inbound aircraft to land on the departure runway. Aircraft are chosen tactically depending on the landing order, wake turbulence catagories and which terminal they are parking at. (Seach for Threads on "Heathrow TEAM")
Say a 747 is approaching from one of the south stacks for 27L and the following aircraft, an A320 also from the south stacks is for 27R. Intermediate Wake Turbulence rules dictate that you must either remain at least 5 miles behind or 1000ft above, but the controllers want to end up with the A320 2 miles(?) diagonally behind the 747 once they're both established on their respective final approaches. By planning ahead and placing the A320 on the other side, it saves Heathrow Final Director quite a bit of work and makes it much easier to put the A320 2 miles diagonally from the 747 infront.
This is one reason for it! I hope the explanation makes sense.
twentypoint4 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2012, 12:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Sometimes to reduce airbourne delays they choose the odd inbound aircraft to land on the departure runway. Aircraft are chosen tactically depending on the landing order, wake turbulence catagories and which terminal they are parking at.
A trial is currently in progress (continuing up to the end of March 2013) which includes provision for landing up to 12 aircraft per hour on the departure runway, subject to defined delay triggers.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2012, 19:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
??? What happened to TEAM? The procedure for running over the top has been in use for many, many years. Its' so much easier for the Final Director. I used to do it all the time during the 06-0700 hour.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2012, 20:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
What happened to TEAM?
TEAM is alive and well and still in operation pretty well every day. But the flavour of the month (well the 9 months from July to March, in fact) is the new, enhanced version, officially designated TEAM*.

Like TEAM, but subject to less stringent delay triggers, and can be deployed at any time from 0700 until the last arrival.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2012, 20:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I wasn't gonna mention any names, like you, me...and PL...
I thought it was a great wheeze...but 'D' Watch didn't seem to take to it...
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2012, 20:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Departures and arrivals from the same runway end, without real time wake turbulence measurement, is lemming talk...
especially with marine and inversion layers present...
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2012, 20:28
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any chance of that in English please?
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2012, 21:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Departures and arrivals from the same runway end, without real time wake turbulence measurement, is lemming talk
On the other hand, simultaneous departures and arrivals from opposite runway ends aren't such a good idea.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2012, 09:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

D Watch didn't do it? Yes we did, you just wasn't around when we did!
vectorer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.