Gliding areas.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gliding areas.
I've been for a bimble this afternoon over to Skeggy and up the coast to Mablethorpe. On turning west at Mabby I was told by the zone I was on (no names no pack drill) that I was infringing Strubby glider field's Notamed area. I was actually about a mile outside, not a lot I know but I was visual with Strubby and the gliders pootling around.
It wasn't a problem, no offense taken or anything I just headed further north but I was wondering if ATC designates a larger area to glider fields than is actually on the half mil map and GPS? And yes I'm much aware of glider fields and the dangers thereof, I'm also a glider pilot.
It wasn't a problem, no offense taken or anything I just headed further north but I was wondering if ATC designates a larger area to glider fields than is actually on the half mil map and GPS? And yes I'm much aware of glider fields and the dangers thereof, I'm also a glider pilot.
What is it NOTAMMed as, advisory such as 'intensive gliding activity's or is it RA(T) or even CAS(T)? If not the two latter, you haven't infringed anything, and as you probably know being a glider pilot, unless local club rules dictate, there's nothing to stop a glider flying as far from base as possible in class G airspace provided the pilot has a map with him.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's just a glider site with 3,000' launches. Like a lot of glider sites (mine included) they fly Wednesdays as well, it's known as old duffers day. Saltby often have a semi permanent Notam on, 'intensive gliding' etc, not a competition or anything, just them doing what they do every day. I have a feeling that the nice lady on ATC was getting mixed up between Notamed and just being 'active.'
Maybe they were just being over cautious. Nothing wrong with that.
Maybe they were just being over cautious. Nothing wrong with that.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 425 Likes
on
224 Posts
infringing Strubby glider field's Notamed area
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Indeed but this is Lincolnshire and therefore the land of our uniformed scopey friends, you have to make allowances for these things...
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Well I know where I'm not....
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder if infringing was the wrong term to use? I suppose this could have depended on what service where you receiving. If I am providing a radar service to a pilot then I have to provide separation from notified areas; commonly 5 miles/1000ft from the published area.
The above is a must for RCS & DC but even if you were on a Traffic Service there is still an obligation on the controller to inform you of traffic that may come into proximity with you, so therefore I would aim to keep you to my prescribed minima.
If you were pootling about on a Basic Service, I would only need to tell you the area is active, it's entirely up to you how close you would get to the boundary. Of course, this leaves you with the possibility of downgrading your service.
The above is a must for RCS & DC but even if you were on a Traffic Service there is still an obligation on the controller to inform you of traffic that may come into proximity with you, so therefore I would aim to keep you to my prescribed minima.
If you were pootling about on a Basic Service, I would only need to tell you the area is active, it's entirely up to you how close you would get to the boundary. Of course, this leaves you with the possibility of downgrading your service.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by ToweringCu
You were happy that you were a mile away, and that was probably sufficient, but a mile on an ATC radar display wouldn't look like much at all.
On the point in the original post, I don't know the area so I ow to those with local knowledge, but I can't find anything NOTAMd about it today (maybe there was something yesterday?) and all I can find in the AIP is notification that winch and aero-tow gliding activity takes place up to 3000 ft at the aerodrome - no lateral limits are specified (ENR 5.5).
If there wasn't anything else notified yesterday, for a controller to talk about infringing something is a bit OTT. Maybe I'm missing something because thing mentions that he/she was a mile outside????
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I could just make it clear I was a mile outside the area, not a mile away from the airfield. I often make the turn in at Mablethorpe and fly between Strubby and Manby glider fields because there is gas venting to 3,600 at Theddlethorpe gas terminal about a mile north of Mab and then that runs straight into Donna Nook danger area, so it's not that I like getting close to glider fields, it's just that the airspace around there is a bit clogged up. I know the area very well and had my GPS which I downloaded the log off and had a look just to check so I know exactly where I was.
It's not a big deal, I was just a little bemused that I had apparently infringed a Notamed area and wondered what the score was. As I said earlier perhaps she may have thought I didn't know about Strubby and just got her terminology wrong, and also as the above poster said maybe a mile doesn't look much on the screen. It was a basic service by the way.
It's not a big deal, I was just a little bemused that I had apparently infringed a Notamed area and wondered what the score was. As I said earlier perhaps she may have thought I didn't know about Strubby and just got her terminology wrong, and also as the above poster said maybe a mile doesn't look much on the screen. It was a basic service by the way.
Guest
Posts: n/a
thing, I understand you were a mile outside the area - I'm just not sure what area you're talking about. Is it on a chart? I haven't spent much time searching for info but it seems to me that as far as the AIP is concerned there is not notified area associated with Strubby, just a notification of gliding/launching activity from the field.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 425 Likes
on
224 Posts
Perhaps "entering a NOTAMed gliding area (or area of NOTAMed intense gliding activity)" might be more appropriate phraseology, rather than "Infringing", which would cause any pilot some consternation.
At the end of the day, as far as gliding activity is concerned, the whole of class G, plus some extra airspace, such as that near Dunstable downs and embedded in Luton's CTR, requires the same "see and avoid", NOTAMed or not.
BTW, anyone can put forward a NOTAM. I discovered this some years ago when I rang the contact number given on a NOTAM. The person who had put it forward was a chap flying birds of prey to and from a tethered kite. I explained that I often needed to enter the given area to gain access to a landing site. He insisted that I must now avoid "his" area by 3nm and 2000ft! The NOTAMed area for launching the kite was itself 3nm in diameter (he varied it day by day), so he reckoned he was entitled to a 6nm radius "sterile" area all to himself. I pointed out that he unfortunately had false expectations because even his local airport, operating large airliners, only had a 2.5nm ATZ to protect it.
Another kite flyer had a permanent NOTAM put on one of my regular routes, right in a choke point where airspace required us to descend to 1500 feet QNH. I rang the contact number to find out more details and the kite flyer's partner answered the phone. She told me the kite flyer was at work and she couldn't remember the last time he had been out flying his kite, it was months before.
I rang AIS to advise them of this. I was told if a NOTAM was submitted in the correct format they had no option but to publish it until it was withdrawn by the applicant.
At the end of the day, as far as gliding activity is concerned, the whole of class G, plus some extra airspace, such as that near Dunstable downs and embedded in Luton's CTR, requires the same "see and avoid", NOTAMed or not.
BTW, anyone can put forward a NOTAM. I discovered this some years ago when I rang the contact number given on a NOTAM. The person who had put it forward was a chap flying birds of prey to and from a tethered kite. I explained that I often needed to enter the given area to gain access to a landing site. He insisted that I must now avoid "his" area by 3nm and 2000ft! The NOTAMed area for launching the kite was itself 3nm in diameter (he varied it day by day), so he reckoned he was entitled to a 6nm radius "sterile" area all to himself. I pointed out that he unfortunately had false expectations because even his local airport, operating large airliners, only had a 2.5nm ATZ to protect it.
Another kite flyer had a permanent NOTAM put on one of my regular routes, right in a choke point where airspace required us to descend to 1500 feet QNH. I rang the contact number to find out more details and the kite flyer's partner answered the phone. She told me the kite flyer was at work and she couldn't remember the last time he had been out flying his kite, it was months before.
I rang AIS to advise them of this. I was told if a NOTAM was submitted in the correct format they had no option but to publish it until it was withdrawn by the applicant.
Unless the kite flying takes place from a civil licenced airfield or a military airfield, you would have to get it issued via AUS not direct with AIS.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
1 Post
someone else:
What, even if you couldn't see any radar returns in that area? How on earth would you report that to the pilot, under any service?
And what's the basis for providing 5nm/1000ft separation from notified areas, as opposed to traffic? Where's that from? I've never seen that in any document. I would not be happy to be vectored 5nm away from a NOTAMed area that I'd flight-planned to miss by a mile, because of some unwritten rule relating to what might possibly be operating inside that area even though no-one can see anything in it.
Please explain!
NS
If I am providing a radar service to a pilot then I have to provide separation from notified areas; commonly 5 miles/1000ft from the published area.
The above is a must for RCS & DC but even if you were on a Traffic Service there is still an obligation on the controller to inform you of traffic that may come into proximity with you, so therefore I would aim to keep you to my prescribed minima.
The above is a must for RCS & DC but even if you were on a Traffic Service there is still an obligation on the controller to inform you of traffic that may come into proximity with you, so therefore I would aim to keep you to my prescribed minima.
And what's the basis for providing 5nm/1000ft separation from notified areas, as opposed to traffic? Where's that from? I've never seen that in any document. I would not be happy to be vectored 5nm away from a NOTAMed area that I'd flight-planned to miss by a mile, because of some unwritten rule relating to what might possibly be operating inside that area even though no-one can see anything in it.
Please explain!
NS
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thing, I understand you were a mile outside the area - I'm just not sure what area you're talking about.
Yes it is on the half mil, it's a bog standard, non Notamed glider site with cables to height 3000'. The area is the little circle that goes along with it, 1nm radius. I know it's not illegal to fly in there, it is however very ill advised unless you want your wing slicing off. We sometimes get low flyers over our glider field, nothing you can do other than wait until they are gone.
Thing, if yiu were working a military unit, they were probably using different charts. On military low flying charts, glider sites are usually depicted with a 2nm avoid radius, so I suspect this may be why the controller thought you were infringing.
I used to spend a lot of time on Farnborough LARS (West) explaining to people that it wasn't a good idea to fly over Lasham below 3700ft on a clear day and still they didn't seem to take notice!
I used to spend a lot of time on Farnborough LARS (West) explaining to people that it wasn't a good idea to fly over Lasham below 3700ft on a clear day and still they didn't seem to take notice!
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 425 Likes
on
224 Posts
Maybe the controller meant to say "notified" gliding site or area, rather than "NOTAMed".
Anyway, hopefully for once we can all agree on the rules pertaining...
Anyway, hopefully for once we can all agree on the rules pertaining...
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madrid FIR
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thing,
I take it from your post #6 the unnamed zone was military. In which case your comments in that post hit the nail on the head. When we (civil) took over the ATC task from the RAF at this airfield we were amazed at how the military mind seems perpetually to be at war. Even the simplest 'Yawn, boring' aircraft movement was turned into an adrenalin and testosterone fuelled frenzy. And regardless of being in Class G airspace, every transitting aircraft was instructed to 'Keep clear of the area' or 'Remain clear of the approach', blind calls on 121.5 being made if the aircraft was not in R/T contact. I think the RAF see themselves as aerial traffic wardens, hence the over-enthusiastic use of the term 'Infringing'.
(Nothing against the military; I had 16 marvelous years wearing a blue suit. But then I saw the light.)
I take it from your post #6 the unnamed zone was military. In which case your comments in that post hit the nail on the head. When we (civil) took over the ATC task from the RAF at this airfield we were amazed at how the military mind seems perpetually to be at war. Even the simplest 'Yawn, boring' aircraft movement was turned into an adrenalin and testosterone fuelled frenzy. And regardless of being in Class G airspace, every transitting aircraft was instructed to 'Keep clear of the area' or 'Remain clear of the approach', blind calls on 121.5 being made if the aircraft was not in R/T contact. I think the RAF see themselves as aerial traffic wardens, hence the over-enthusiastic use of the term 'Infringing'.
(Nothing against the military; I had 16 marvelous years wearing a blue suit. But then I saw the light.)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are indeed. I have to add our 'own' blue suit zone are always great, because they know who we are and recognise the call signs and indeed some of them fly with us. In fact I was surprised I was passed over to 'XXX' as I normally stay with my own zone whilst floating around the locality.
Doncaster are next door and the change in ethos is very striking. Not any more or less efficient, just 'different'.
Doncaster are next door and the change in ethos is very striking. Not any more or less efficient, just 'different'.