Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Speed bird check in

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Speed bird check in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jan 2012, 12:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Swindon
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speed bird check in

Is there any reason why some speedbird upon check in with London tell them which arrival they are expecting? Eg Speedbird XXX ............expecting the Ockham 2 Fox
clonecity1 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2012, 12:33
  #2 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Perhaps so as to have as much time as possible to re-brief and set the aircraft up if they're going to have to fly another arrival?????
 
Old 1st Jan 2012, 12:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It's to reduce R/T traffic.

Under the "old" system:

1. You'd check in with London,

2. They would acknowledge and issue the STAR ( the arrival, which was almost inevitably the one you'd have on your flight plan and already loaded in the FMC).

3. You'd read back the STAR to ATC.

4. They'd confirm the readback was correct.

Under the current system:

1. You check in with London and tell them your flight planned STAR in one transmission.

2. They acknowledge with one transmission.

Last edited by wiggy; 1st Jan 2012 at 14:52.
wiggy is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2012, 14:53
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Swindon
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok,
Notwithstanding the theory behind this, there is invariably a third transmission anyway after you are given a direct eg Numpo then Bedek...
and thereby obfuscate the cunning tactics of Nigel.
clonecity1 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2012, 15:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hundred Acre Wood
Posts: 264
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not just BA, Midland callsigns have to do it too.
Doug E Style is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2012, 18:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do it, and I'm with EZY. You know with 99% certainty what arrival you are going to get and it just reduces the RT.
billybuds is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2012, 20:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flybe (Jersey) do it as well. We have been doing this for about 2 years.
choppercopper 99 is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2012, 03:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
there is invariably a third transmission anyway after you are given a direct eg Numpo then Bedek...
and thereby obfuscate the cunning tactics of Nigel.
That might be true but just to be clear this is not a tactic or non-standard procedure that the Nigels at BA made up.

The inclusion of the flight planned STAR in the initial call to London was requested by ATC for all traffic inbound to the LTMA a couple of years back, AFAIR promulgated by NOTAM.

Any of our ATC colleagues at London able to provide current chapter and verse on this?

Last edited by wiggy; 2nd Jan 2012 at 09:16.
wiggy is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 21:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ongoing trial in an attempt to reduce RTF loading, STAR is to be reported on initial check in with London.

Thomson are also involved and I think Lufthansa may be too. I believe it is only for routes into a London TMA airfield and Southampton and Bournemouth.

IMHO, works quite well!!
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2012, 20:27
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
absolutely 5 miles.....when sector is busy, it helps immensely when the aircraft that calls on gives you all the information required so that you get on with something else and you only have to give a STAR if it is different from that expected which is very rare.
There are more and more airlines doing this so please keep up the good work. it is appreciated.
Conspiracy Theories is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2012, 20:35
  #11 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about this for reducing RT loading. Don't check in at all and wait for ATC to call you. They know you're coming.

Seems to work inbound to Logan at certain times of the day.....
Human Factor is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2012, 23:24
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HF, ATC have no idea that you are actually listening out and that the previous control have transferred you. There are occasions where "blind calling" happens and can work, but not always. Give it another 10 years or so though, and there won't be any RTF unless its an emergency......!
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2012, 09:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Costa del Swanwick
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This "trial " has been going on now for around 5 years. More airlines and STARS have been introduced but I now think it is time that it is either stopped completely or adopted as a procedure.

I understand it was SRG that was the barrier to full introduction hiding behind NATSs failure to provide accurate information on the success of the trial.

I agree with "conspiracy" and would urge all of the operators to tell us your STAR and give us the momentum to get it formalised quickly.

The only real issue is if there is en-route holding before you get to the end of the STAR eg BRASO and we are pretty good at picking those events up-in fact I don't think there have been any issues with a/c going beyond the outer hold because it was missed on first contact.
250 kts is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2012, 23:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the rain
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know where this NOTAM is hiding? I remember seeing it issued and I always report STAR on contact, but never hear any company traffic doing it.

S.
babotika is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2012, 00:04
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NOTAM? Never seen one of those for years.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2012, 00:37
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Playing Golf!
Age: 46
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Afrim its Lufthansa SOP and right there on the charts to remind you!
PT6A is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2012, 11:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Age: 75
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not checking in with London ATC

Sometimes it is just not possible. I know you are busy people but please tell me why there seems to be a competition between London controllers (mainly women) to see who can make the longest ATC transmission without a break or breath. I think I counted 20 different calls once and I just gave up and sure enough the 21st call was "is XXX 125 on frequency" made with a slightly annoyed tone of voice.
hawker750 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.