LGW LAM4M Stepped Climb
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere
Age: 41
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LGW LAM4M Stepped Climb
Departing LGW tonight on the LAM4M, couldn't get a word in on London frequency so on reaching DET29 i was about to dial in 5000 to be level at ACORN thus following the SID Vertical Profile when my Captain stopped me saying maintain 4000. Shouldn't we have followed the vertical profile? Been searching online but can't find a definitive answer/reference. For example what if terrain had been an issue?
Edited to add image of plate:
Edited to add image of plate:
Last edited by redED; 21st Dec 2011 at 00:38.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Age: 45
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes you should have otherwise you'll end up in London City's airspace which is up to 4000ft. There's no terrain issue, just other aircraft . The chart would state if you needed ATC clearance to climb with the profile.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere
Age: 41
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Vortex, terrain was used as an example not specifically for this SID. The Captain was saying without clearance you can't climb, i was saying the clearance is written on the plate in the vertical profile as part of the SID.
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chart in the AIP also shows to be level at 5,000' at ACORN, along with the wording "...pilots must ensure strict compliance with the specified climb profile unless cleared by ATC.". Suggest you show him a copy!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even in the absence of terrain issues, following the SID vertical profile ensures you don't stray outside controlled airspace, as the base steps up as you leave the CTR. These areas of class G can often be quite busy with light A/C etc under the TMA.
If you ever fly the MONTY/NOKIN SIDs from EGCC, (which go to 5000ft), the vertical profile ensures you stay above the NANTI departures from EGGP, which climb to 4000ft underneath the Manch' outbounds.
If you ever fly the MONTY/NOKIN SIDs from EGCC, (which go to 5000ft), the vertical profile ensures you stay above the NANTI departures from EGGP, which climb to 4000ft underneath the Manch' outbounds.
Last edited by ZOOKER; 21st Dec 2011 at 11:07.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This captain is NEVER wrong if you know what I mean!
He must be if Controllers are always right
He must be if Controllers are always right
Anyhow, when I could get a word in (frequency congestion on 120.525, never!) I asked if our idea of keeping heading was a good plan... Well, the response was astonishingly appreciative!
(An LHR outbound 747 on our LHS)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hope all of these instances of perceived frequency congestion are included in voyage reports, ASRs or CHIRPs. Don't forget that next time you might need to shout MAYDAY at someone.
One of the questions often asked regarding the rather grey area of 'ATC overloads' is, "could you have safely handled an emergency with the volume of traffic in your airspace"? If the RTF is so busy that a distress, or a PAN call cannot be made, it adds a whole new dimension to the proceedings.
One of the questions often asked regarding the rather grey area of 'ATC overloads' is, "could you have safely handled an emergency with the volume of traffic in your airspace"? If the RTF is so busy that a distress, or a PAN call cannot be made, it adds a whole new dimension to the proceedings.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Somewhere on a RWY
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I fully agree with the issues of RTF congestion.
Just remember that a mayday can be "transmitted" using the XPDR. And a controller can impose silence, stop departures etc...
Although I can't remember doing it (imposing silence)
B.
Just remember that a mayday can be "transmitted" using the XPDR. And a controller can impose silence, stop departures etc...
Although I can't remember doing it (imposing silence)
B.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
redED, does your captain have at least Level 4 English Language? Is the Plate really that difficult to understand? Your captain was not only wrong but DANGEROUS to maintain 4000ft without ATC clearance. I suggest that you print off this thread for your captain before he or she hits another aeroplane...
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cough
An LHR outbound 747 on our LHS
In visual contact with all traffic it might be ok (as a Lightning pilot would say "One peep is worth a thousand sweeps") but in IMC I would advocate flying the SID as published. At least your widow would have the satisfaction of knowing it was not your fault......
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh trust me, I only knew it was a 747, coz I'd been watching it for a while. Visually, we were in front of the 747 on a parallel track, and an airprox/tcas event would have been next had we turned. So if you are suggesting that I turn in front of a huge lump of metal that I can see just because my clearance is something else then I need to say, gulp, airmanship?
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No - have another look at my post? It should really have been filed as an MOR for the controller, however, if there really was no clearance for the published SID or vectoring instruction given. He/she SHOULD have been expecting you to turn left unless otherwise instructed. Controller needed botty smacking.
The point I was making was that you had little idea what might be descending/climbing/turning into the 'clear airspace' ahead of you (LCY/Biggin?) if you continued on heading and while you displayed your usual outstanding airmanship and Cough saved the day it was not a procedure to be blithely recommended. SIDs are there for a reason.
The point I was making was that you had little idea what might be descending/climbing/turning into the 'clear airspace' ahead of you (LCY/Biggin?) if you continued on heading and while you displayed your usual outstanding airmanship and Cough saved the day it was not a procedure to be blithely recommended. SIDs are there for a reason.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But DET 10d on the SID you should have been at 5,000ft not 6,000ft. Maybe that's why the 747 at 6,000ft was in the way of a left turn
Maybe that's why it's a stepped climb, so that only after you clear that track, at LAM 15d, do you start to climb to 6,000ft.
Nevertheless Good Airmanship
Maybe that's why it's a stepped climb, so that only after you clear that track, at LAM 15d, do you start to climb to 6,000ft.
Nevertheless Good Airmanship