Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

ATC-ARFF-FlightCrew emergency communication

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

ATC-ARFF-FlightCrew emergency communication

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd May 2011 | 05:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Question ATC-ARFF-FlightCrew emergency communication

Hello

I´m a commercial pilot (A320) and also study air safety management at city university/ UK. For my project i´m doing research on ATC-ARFF-Flight Crew emergency communication. One part will be the effectiveness of a discrete frequency. Certain german airports are currently testing the use of a def. For UK airports this is normal for more then a decade. Therefore i would like to know from you ( fire fighters, atc, pilots):
What problems/ challenges did you face, when you had to communicate with ATC-ARFF-Flight Crew in an emergency or during an incident?
for example language, different perception, etc.
What are the negative aspect of a discrete frequency ( if there are any)?
Where do you see room for improvement when it comes to ATC-ARFF-Flight Crew emergency communication?
Would be very useful if you could share your experience.
Thank you
Hoschi
hoschi is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd May 2011 | 07:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,266
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire, UK
The use of a discrete VHF frequency for pilots to communicate with the safety services has been employed in the UK for more than a decade - for at least 40 years at some places. It was very simple: When an aircraft with a problem left the runway the pilot was instructed to contact the safety services on box 2. He then let ATC know when the safety services had authorised him to continue to the gate. All very simple and it worked well..
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2011 | 12:55
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Question

The FAA published a list of handsignals for firefighters in order to communicate with flight crews in case of communication breakdowns. They are called Standard Emergency Hand and Arm Signals (Recommend Evacuation/ Recommend Stop/Emergency Contained).
Do those handsignals also exists in the UK and are they useful?
hoschi is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2011 | 13:07
  #4 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 1
From: Up someone's nose
IIRC in the States the fire trucks at major airfields had the frequency painted on the sides.
Lon More is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2011 | 13:20
  #5 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,446
Likes: 366
From: Wildest Surrey
The frequency normally used in the UK is NOT an ATC frequency and ATC cannot normally transmit or receive it; as HD says it is solely for comms between the crew of the aircraft and AFRS.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 24th May 2011 | 20:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: hotels all over the globe
interesting to learn:

In a similar case as UPS B744 in DXB, when the pilot could not see or change freq. the R VHF is always set to 121.5, easy to use, so if a pilot uses only 121.5 all the way from cruise FL to PAX evac in any airport, would he be able to communicate with all ATC concerned?
Any ATC station can communicate in 121.5?
Are the FIRE CREWS also on 121.5?

A change of frequency in not always possible as the UPS case showed
ricfly744 is offline  
Reply
Old 24th May 2011 | 20:40
  #7 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,446
Likes: 366
From: Wildest Surrey
In the UK, it's rare for a civil airport ATC or RFFS to be able to access 121.5; usually ATC wise it's only the ATCC that has it by virtue of the 'Distress and Diversion' cell.
The system usually is that if you have an emergency, you stay on the frequency in use (except when you need to communicate with RFFS) and the controller offloads all other traffic to another frequency.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2012 | 10:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Bournemouth UK
Latest on this?

from AeroSafety World June 2012 pp42-45- I hope this is interesting for you, hoschi
LedZeppelin is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2012 | 16:26
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Canada
We have a discrete frequency for ARFF here and it works well. We also monitor 121.5 and I'm pretty sure all towers in Canada do.

We also have a tuneable vhf in the cab and can access any frequency through that radio it has limited range and is most often used to get over flights on the correct freq for the ACC.
Tower Controller is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2012 | 19:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 153
Likes: 2
From: South Coast and Suffolk
In the UK, it's rare for a civil airport ATC or RFFS to be able to access 121.5; usually ATC wise it's only the ATCC that has it by virtue of the 'Distress and Diversion' cell.
In the UK, it is now a requirement for ATC Control Towers and Approach Control Sectors, serving international aerodromes and international alternative aerodromes*, to be able to provide a service on 121.500.

As 121.500 is an ATC frequency, the equipment/recording needs to comply with the usual CAA requirements and as a result, a lot of units have signed an annual LoA with D&D to provide such a service on their behalf until such time they have the equipment to be able to provide the service themselves.

Whether these units will ever have the equipment to provide the service or will continue to sign a new LoA each year remains to be seen!

* A list of Aerodromes deemed to be 'International' available on request!
Andy Mayes is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2012 | 22:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: southeast england
The frequency normally used in the UK is NOT an ATC frequency and ATC cannot normally transmit or receive it; as HD says it is solely for comms between the crew of the aircraft and AFRS.
I'm not sure about all units but we can certainly select the freq to monitor if required (not sure about transmitting on it)
vespasia is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd July 2012 | 06:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: UK
We have transmit/receive capability on 121.5 and receive only on 121.6.
reportyourlevel is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.