Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Airliners mixing it with gliders and puddle-jumpers?

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Airliners mixing it with gliders and puddle-jumpers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Apr 2010, 18:50
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: England
Age: 70
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deconfliction

You would be hard pressed to find a controller giving a Deconfliction service in an area of high activity. They may at best get a Traffic Service and told where there the gliders are ie.

"Big Jet 123, area of high intensity gliding in your 12 o'clock, 5 miles, keep a good look out"
Thanks Vortex issues, that's all I need.
BugOutWest is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2010, 18:53
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,915
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I'd be cautious in generalising about how well gliders show on primary radar. My experience suggests that some gliders are detected on some types of primary radar.
spekesoftly is online now  
Old 25th Apr 2010, 19:03
  #23 (permalink)  

Lead on...
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Dorset
Posts: 91
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Primary radar

I'd be cautious in generalising about how well gliders show on primary radar. My experience suggests that some gliders are detected on some types of primary radar.
Sounds like BoW has a point. It's not a great place for airliners to be, in among the plastic aircraft.
McDuff is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2010, 20:16
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bugoutwest is right to be concerned about CAT flying outside CAS, in a busy part of the country, at levels used by light aircraft (including gliders). If CAS is available it should be used. Flying over a busy gliding site or aerodrome at these sort of altitudes and speeds, in an unmanoeverable jet is pretty poor airmanship. Airline pilots will not be keeping a good lookout and they are unlikely to be supplied with a deconfliction service (particularly in an area of high traffic density). Gliders do not always show on primary radar and when they do, are often mistaken as clutter or simply ignored by ATCOs. Some of the comments in reply to Bugout (while probably technically correct) show naivety and a lack of appreciation.
ToweringCu is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2010, 20:41
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think many CAT pilots would do it out of choice.

Ops tells you to shift an airframe the IFR flight plan gets submitted a couple of hours slot comes up on it due to flow restriction in an area sector. The aircraft is required 30 mins ago to be somewhere. Crew get told to take it VFR. Its legal so you have to do it or risk having a no tea and biscuits or possibly worse.

Until the ANO is changed so its not legal, it will continue to happen whatever the opinion of pilots or ATCO's.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2010, 20:50
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe that the practice of mixing airliners with small GAT or gliders (which, as I said, are nearly invisible) is more risky than necessary
Could I suggest that the mixing of operations may not necessarily be the problem? I learnt to fly in an environment where many different types of aircraft were mixed with many other types. Uncontrolled airspace almost did not exist - but the freedom of VFR flying was still preserved away from terminal areas.

If the glider and airline are both in receipt of a suitable ATC service, could adaquate separation be performed? The fact that the glider is nearly always invisible on radar may be a problem if the glider issues inaccurate position reports? Or is the fitting of a mode-C/S transponder feasible?
fuzzy6988 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 04:59
  #27 (permalink)  

Lead on...
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Dorset
Posts: 91
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Glider kit

Could I suggest that the mixing of operations may not necessarily be the problem? I learnt to fly in an environment where many different types of aircraft were mixed with many other types. Uncontrolled airspace almost did not exist - but the freedom of VFR flying was still preserved away from terminal areas.

If the glider and airline are both in receipt of a suitable ATC service, could adaquate separation be performed? The fact that the glider is nearly always invisible on radar may be a problem if the glider issues inaccurate position reports? Or is the fitting of a mode-C/S transponder feasible?
I suspect that many gliders don't have radios, let alone transponders: weight is a major consideration as well as cost.

I've flown in Florida as well, fuzzy, and I know that you mean about the many different types, but there are 2 differences, I reckon: most light aircraft get a traffic or deconfliction service (from what I used to hear on the radio with Jacksonville Centre) and all military are flying IFR, even at low level, unless they're in the range or the manoeuvring areas (TMAs).
McDuff is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2010, 18:54
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Tcu:
Gliders do not always show on primary radar and when they do, are often...simply ignored by ATCOs
Two days gone and no ATCO responses to that? - c'mon guys!
NS
NorthSouth is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2010, 22:22
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: somewhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
> Two days gone and no ATCO responses to that?

No €€€. No incentive. No talk.
dpo2309j is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 04:48
  #30 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Two days gone and no ATCO responses to that? - c'mon guys!
Well, I'm an ex-controller....and bored for a few minutes - will I do?

I spent many years working traffic in a mixed airspace environment (inside and outside CAS, and a variety of different classes) with areas which respectively attracted mil and GA aircraft and gliders. What the controller sees on radar depends on the type of radar and the aircraft characteristics.

One primary radar that I used was excellent at displaying gliders - and anyone with the right knowledge and training could easily be pretty sure they were looking at a glider rather than clutter (just as they could recognise angels, anaprop and other common radar artefacts). And no-one I know ignored the targets that were displayed - they may not have provided a service in an area where there were multiple targets, but they did not ignore them.

This particular radar was not heavily processed and so all of these things could be seen on the display. However, other processing systems typically used today are designed to filter out anything that isn't deemed to be a 'proper' (and I mean no disrespect to pilots who fly things that might not fall into this category) aircraft.
 
Old 28th Apr 2010, 07:53
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With heavily processed primary,gliders could be partially visible to completely gone depending on the RAG map setting.When they are visible then thermalling gliders look like a windfarm.Single gliders can be mistaken for spurious because the of the low speed and intermittent returns.Some high performance ones like the ASH25 can show,where as the old K8 no chance.
I didn't ignore them.Just vectored the pilot around what I could see,or downgraded the service.If VFRs wanted to overfly the gliding site,then here's their frequency,and the pilot can talk to them.Class G
throw a dyce is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 10:11
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,819
Received 97 Likes on 70 Posts
Easyjet (and other airlines) frequently operate crew-only positioning flights into Lasham airfield for maintenance, this being the busiest gliding site in the country. Sometimes they do a visual approach, mostly it's an SRA, but except when Farnborough is closed ie roughly 10pm - 7am weekdays or 8pm - 8am weekends, they are operating under at least traffic service. If the operators and their insurance companies are happy with this, then BugOutWest should accept it's not an unusual or dangerous situation.
chevvron is online now  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 10:47
  #33 (permalink)  
DFC
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Little aircraft should be kept well away from big ones.

Don't let those pesky B737 or A320s anywhere near an A380. They should have separate airfields and separate zones and only the little ones (B737 and A320) should be allowed to fly over peoples back gardens.

DFC is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2010, 09:55
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: England
Age: 70
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Co-operation

Easyjet (and other airlines) frequently operate crew-only positioning flights into Lasham airfield for maintenance, this being the busiest gliding site in the country. Sometimes they do a visual approach, mostly it's an SRA, but except when Farnborough is closed ie roughly 10pm - 7am weekdays or 8pm - 8am weekends, they are operating under at least traffic service. If the operators and their insurance companies are happy with this, then BugOutWest should accept it's not an unusual or dangerous situation.
That sounds like a good bit of co-operation, chevvron.

I should be surprised if that happens around my neck of the woods, though.
BugOutWest is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2010, 11:08
  #35 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
seems to be related to the Protocol thread
Lon More is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 17:09
  #36 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: England
Age: 70
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Atlantic Airlines mixing it with gliders etc ...

Hmmm, since my last post I have discovered radarvirtuel.com. From this I managed to find the flight parameters of an Atlantic Airlines B733 (?) flying on an easterly heading over Gransden glider site at between 2,500 and 3,000ft at around 1632Z today.

I wasn't there at the time, but I saw the aircraft from my garden. It was too far away to be a nuisance, of course, but I was extremely concerned at the aircraft's height -- particularly since my son was gliding at that airfield only a few hours earlier.

Again, flying an airliner in open airspace in the vicinity of gliders which are virtually invisible to radar, and which are very difficult to pick up visually is for me extremely poor airmanship.

Any dissenters?

BoW
BugOutWest is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 18:07
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What exactly do you expect us to do about it Bug?

Current climate of jobs and ops asked me to do it. I would give the choice of doing it or looking for another job along with the othr 1-2k pilots out of work in the UK a good thinking about for all of half a second then agree to do it.

There are quiet a few place round the UK where airliners mix with GA and gliders in Class G. In fact if you wanted to ban it you would cut off the whole of the North and West of Scotland.

Its the company's you will have to speak to/ or make life difficult (through your MP maybe) to get any changes. ATCO's can't stop the practise and for every pilot that refuses to do it there are another 3 who would be quite happy to operate to get a job.

Last edited by mad_jock; 22nd May 2010 at 18:25.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 20:33
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
positioning flights into Lasham airfield for maintenance.....do a visual approach, mostly it's an SRA, but except when Farnborough is closed ie roughly 10pm - 7am weekdays or 8pm - 8am weekends, they are operating under at least traffic service.
Don't worry, chevvers, they get a Traffic Service when Farnborough is closed.....
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 21:27
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Luton
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hmmm, since my last post I have discovered radarvirtuel.com. From this I managed to find the flight parameters of an Atlantic Airlines B733 (?) flying on an easterly heading over Gransden glider site at between 2,500 and 3,000ft at around 1632Z today.
If the comment above is accurate then the airliner pilots involved are very brave. Gransden Lodge is a notified cable launch site to 3,000' above surface (250').
Jim59 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 08:16
  #40 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: England
Age: 70
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snapshot of the RadarVirtuel picture

If the comment above is accurate then the airliner pilots involved are very brave. Gransden Lodge is a notified cable launch site to 3,000' above surface (250').
Well, I've grabbed a snapshot of the Atlantic Airlines track off RadarVirtuel website. Jim59. I'm not sure that it's going to work as a link.

I'm not sure that "brave" is a good way to describe this sort of flight path. He/she might have considered it safe because it was late on a Saturday afternoon. Perhaps Stansted had ascertained that gliding had finished for the day, but I really don't think that an airliner should be there.

BoW

Picasa Web Albums - cmacdb - Airliner tracks

Last edited by BugOutWest; 23rd May 2010 at 08:28. Reason: Improve reading
BugOutWest is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.