Is a standby ATC tower required?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sylt, Germany
Age: 57
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is a standby ATC tower required?
I know that many airports have a standby tower, but that is only because they build a new tower to meet the demand in increase of traffic. However, is it a requirement to have a standby ATC tower if there is none Tried to search ICAO docs but could not find any.
Guest
Posts: n/a
There's no requirement for a standby tower in ICAO - although there is a SARP that says there should be a contingency plan. Of course, a contingency plan may simply be to withdraw the service.
I think you'll find more in the EUROCONTROL ESSIP - there certainly used to be - but I'm not up to speed with the current details. This will apply to DE.
I think you'll find more in the EUROCONTROL ESSIP - there certainly used to be - but I'm not up to speed with the current details. This will apply to DE.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester
Age: 79
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Standby Towers or Emergency Control Units
Many years ago - in the early 1970s (before even MACC opened) - Manchester Airport decided to utilise an old "Runway Controller Caravan" as an Emergency Control Unit. Later, that was replaced with a portakabin-type building. Both were located near the landing threshold of what is now 05L. In neither case was any radar contingency provided so the plan was that approach control (procedural) and aerodrome control be provided. In reality, that plan was hopelessly unrealistic. Given that there was neither willingness nor money on the part of the airport owners, the idea of such an emergency control facility was knocked on the head - if I recall correctly - around 2001. [The matter had to be addressed as part of the Unit Safety Case]. The ECU building was retained as a communications point so that ATC could keep in touch with LACC during any evacuation period.
Since then, I have departed from NATS so the above information is historic. Perhaps some current Manchester bod might update us?
There is no obligation to maintain an emergency control facility (or standby tower). It becomes a commercial judgment. The usual choice is to accept the risk of loss of business in what is perhaps a once in a Preston Guild timescale.
Since then, I have departed from NATS so the above information is historic. Perhaps some current Manchester bod might update us?
There is no obligation to maintain an emergency control facility (or standby tower). It becomes a commercial judgment. The usual choice is to accept the risk of loss of business in what is perhaps a once in a Preston Guild timescale.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In our medium sized airport (Norway) our contingency plan for a u/s tower is to drive the "tower-car" into a nice position where you have a good look-out, and use the radio in the car to get the a/c on the ground. Then we close up shop 
