Calling All Piots Who Fly Outside Of Controlled Airspace
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: worcestershire
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OUTCAS
My advice would be to suggest that if FISO and LARS and ATC units were really connected rather than just by having a telephone call the whole situation would be better. In this day and age of Global Intergrated Communications any non flyer would be amazed that air safety is often based on people just making a telephone call.
I use Farnborough anf Brize alot and get excellent service but feel sometimes that asking for a co-ordinated approach in to say Blackbush from Farnborough is too much of an ask. They have to go off line to make a phone call. What I then have to do having negotiated round 2 MATZ is an overhead join at 250 IAS slwing to 160 in the circuit which for passengers is a fairground ride. I also use FISO when I get dumped out of the airways a long way from my destination which is often the case in the South East. A FISO service at 300knts is helpful but in IMC dangerous then I have to try and get de-conflict from someone.
A more published procedure would be very helpful for pilots who are tryning to do the right thing. I think this would be a constructive approach to your new emplyees. They will believe that IFR and airways have little to do with FISO as they only think of the large airports and published Instrument Arrival and Approach.
I use Farnborough anf Brize alot and get excellent service but feel sometimes that asking for a co-ordinated approach in to say Blackbush from Farnborough is too much of an ask. They have to go off line to make a phone call. What I then have to do having negotiated round 2 MATZ is an overhead join at 250 IAS slwing to 160 in the circuit which for passengers is a fairground ride. I also use FISO when I get dumped out of the airways a long way from my destination which is often the case in the South East. A FISO service at 300knts is helpful but in IMC dangerous then I have to try and get de-conflict from someone.
A more published procedure would be very helpful for pilots who are tryning to do the right thing. I think this would be a constructive approach to your new emplyees. They will believe that IFR and airways have little to do with FISO as they only think of the large airports and published Instrument Arrival and Approach.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: An ATC centre this side of the moon.
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hell if the wx is crap and I want the current ATIS for HIAL airports I give Scottish Info a call from way above 5000ft,
Although Scottish info does seem to be crewed by some right characters (said in the nicest possible way)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: worcestershire
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OUTCAS
Prob 270 IAS but 300 + over the ground when you leave the airway in to Class G depending on what level you leaeve the airway but often you are dumped out high.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't change the characters for anything.
As an Instructor the characters at Scottish info have made the student learning curve of pressing the tit one of enjoyment instead of terror.
You guys probably don't realise the tone of your voice and your patience does way more to encouraging students to use the service available than any number of briefs on airmanship and RT.
I am sure some prat who has never been near a PPL student would have issue with "Roger G-xx take a deep breath you nearly got it that time and now say again"
As an instructor I say crack on it aids flight safety.
And PS whats wrong with 300knts above FL100 in class G.
As an Instructor the characters at Scottish info have made the student learning curve of pressing the tit one of enjoyment instead of terror.
You guys probably don't realise the tone of your voice and your patience does way more to encouraging students to use the service available than any number of briefs on airmanship and RT.
I am sure some prat who has never been near a PPL student would have issue with "Roger G-xx take a deep breath you nearly got it that time and now say again"
As an instructor I say crack on it aids flight safety.
And PS whats wrong with 300knts above FL100 in class G.
Last edited by mad_jock; 6th Nov 2009 at 19:12.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the rain
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got the opportunity to do some joyriding around the alps a few years ago, VFR. I remember we called Munich and Vienna Info for FIS and a RIS, but one where we didn't have to practically sign a contract with the ground unit and could manoeuvre as we wished while still being provided with radar based traffic information. Vienna even co-ordinated our transit through Innsbruck controlled airspace.
I've had a very similar service from Montreal, Toronto, Moncton, Boston, Albuquerque ACCs but this time we were sharing the frequency with airways traffic.
I really can't get my head around why London and Scottish info aren't equipped to provide LARS centrally rather than have to bounce between various approach units and beg for a traffic/deconfliction service. I know the controllers at said units are more than willing to oblige workload permitting, and they do an outstanding job, but a little more organisation wouldn't go amiss.
Just my thoughts anyway... I spend most of my time in the upper atmosphere now but this still bothers me.
I've had a very similar service from Montreal, Toronto, Moncton, Boston, Albuquerque ACCs but this time we were sharing the frequency with airways traffic.
I really can't get my head around why London and Scottish info aren't equipped to provide LARS centrally rather than have to bounce between various approach units and beg for a traffic/deconfliction service. I know the controllers at said units are more than willing to oblige workload permitting, and they do an outstanding job, but a little more organisation wouldn't go amiss.
Just my thoughts anyway... I spend most of my time in the upper atmosphere now but this still bothers me.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: An ATC centre this side of the moon.
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As an Instructor the characters at Scottish info have made the student learning curve of pressing the tit one of enjoyment instead of terror.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: From Despair To Nowhere
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
babotika
Have you thought of the advantages of the UK system? Like the fact that all the radar traffic in the area is working the same controller? How about the problems of operating the system you suggest? Have you ever heard how busy Farnborough gets? London would end up with so many sectors you'd end up changing frequency just as often! It might not be a perfect system, but it has developed for a reason (well, apart from the new ATSOCAS system).
Have you thought of the advantages of the UK system? Like the fact that all the radar traffic in the area is working the same controller? How about the problems of operating the system you suggest? Have you ever heard how busy Farnborough gets? London would end up with so many sectors you'd end up changing frequency just as often! It might not be a perfect system, but it has developed for a reason (well, apart from the new ATSOCAS system).
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Like the fact that all the radar traffic in the area is working the same controller?
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: An ATC centre this side of the moon.
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
south of Aberdeen where traffic within 10 miles of each other can be working 4 different controllers, madness!
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: From Despair To Nowhere
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only to climb up or descend. However in my experience in other regions of the UK there is a smooth handover (usually 'contact' rather than 'free call' too) at appropriate points between radar units. The point I made (albeit I was not clear) is that approach radar is talking to the inbound and local traffic as well as me as transit traffic; area radar would not be. The former is not always relevant, but there are plenty of LARS units which don't have their own controlled airspace, including most of the military ones, and arrivals to most others from outside controlled airspace. I would not like to pass through parts of East Anglia without talking to the local mil controllers, having heard how many they are talking to and what that traffic is doing!
By the way in some countries all area radar, even in controlled airspace, is by local controllers. It seems odd to hear a taxi clearance given when you are in the airways!
By the way in some countries all area radar, even in controlled airspace, is by local controllers. It seems odd to hear a taxi clearance given when you are in the airways!