Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Plymouth Airport Bird Control Unit disbands

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Plymouth Airport Bird Control Unit disbands

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Aug 2009, 21:16
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Age: 67
Posts: 257
Received 59 Likes on 23 Posts
Zooker
No EGCC does not (his legacy is well remembered and lives on though!) ... but .. it does have a full time Wildlife Control person who monitors/co-ordinates/researches etc.

The day to day bird scaring is done 24/7 by an assigned person each shift from the Airfield Safety Team .... they do not perform any other duties when on this shift.
42psi is online now  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 21:53
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by niknak
Well that goes to prove that having a dedicated BCU is no more effective than having the wildlife dispersal done on an irregular basis.
In fact it could be convincingly argued by no fee no win lawyers that the BCU operator at Kinloss contributed to this accident by failing in his professional duties and dispersing the birds from one point, but failing to ensure that they had been dispersed away from the runway and approaches.

Worthy of thought for anyone involved in BCU operations, especially Safeskys and the individual BCU operators in a similar situation - you would both be equally culpable.

A bird control unit can't be everywhere at any one time and unless the operator is omnipresent and precisely because of the above, airport authorities are highly likely to go for the option of not having dedicated BCUs.
Any airport thinking of abandoning full time 24/7 wildlife control is asking for trouble. It's amazing how many think bird/animal control begins and ends at the runway. Unless you can prove through an audit trail that you did everything possible to avoid bird strikes etc. you will end up on the wrong end of a claim. This includes controlling any hazards within a 15km radius of the airfield. Working with other local business/parks etc to minimise risk. Not only scaring wildlife but actively culling when needed.
Birds being birds, no one can give a cast iron guarantee of a bird free airport but a well trained, full time BCU can drastically reduce the risk of a major bird strike.
call100 is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 13:21
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Niknak Noooooooooo

Niknak,

You really should not open your mouth until you check your facts.

Safeskys provides bird control on every RAF Station in England & Wales.

Another provider (AWM) provides bird control at RAF Kinloss.

Safeskys' bird controllers are professionals and do not 'move birds from one location to another'. They take a great pride in their job and have won many awards and plaudits from RAF customers.

They object to your ill informed slur. Will you apologise ?
Vulcan Lover is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 13:44
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps you are correct but in low light when the birds flew North of the runway it was impossible to see where they landed, they merely circled and landed out of sight. That being said, Kinloss bay has one of the largest concentrations of seabirds and they settle on the beach in the approach to runway 08. No more fatal accidents since, that has to tell you something.
WhatMeanPullUp is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 15:56
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Living In The Past
Age: 76
Posts: 299
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How times have changed - old codgers like me will probably remember the rubbish tip under the 06 (now 05) approach at Glasgow in the 70's, just beyond the M8 - gull heaven !
I don't know when it went but I'm sure the BAA had a hard job getting the council to quit, as the heap got quite high during my time @ PF
Eric T Cartman is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 19:52
  #26 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VL

No slur published - nothing to apologise for .

Tighten yer knicker elastic Richard and concentrate on getting ATC work.
niknak is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 20:14
  #27 (permalink)  

Forewarned is Forearmed
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: uk
Age: 60
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a Bird Control Co-ordinator of a number of years, there is no doubt that the return to an outdated unprofessional approach at any licensed airfield of this size by utilising Firefighters to carry out these duties reflects the lack and importance and understanding of the Bird Hazard by any aerodrome authority.

I have yet to see an effective Bird Control Unit staffed by Fire fighters, thankfully some have learnt from lessons in the past and this type of approach is very much in the minority.

The stats will show how effective things are in a few months with the annual return of Gulls and migrating birds.
Ranger 1 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2009, 00:23
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: southwest
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nimrod birdstrike

Having worked on the BCU for 2 years I can honestly say it is a vital cog in safety, a Nimrod went down about one year after I arrived at RAF Kinloss in 1983 due to ingestion of a flock of about 400 seabirds. A New Zealand Air Force pilot on a secondment lost his life, the birds were cleared from the middle of the runway but settled at the end of the runway, the result was they lifted as the aircraft rotated and the aircraft crashed in the Rozelle woods. Keep the birds away, for their sake as much as the human costs, if you think air safety is expensive try an accident.
Slightly confused, are you referring to Nimrod XV256 which suffered a birdstrike on take-off on the 17th November 1980 the report said 77 birds were recovered and the aircraft hit Canada Geese flying from their roost to their feeding ground ?

This was the birdstrike that change the way bird control was carried out in the RAF.
Up until then BCUs were manned by volunteers (volunteered!) personnel from various sections around the station(s) acoss the UK. After this accident it changed to TG9 staff which were Assistant Air Traffic Controllers then later, for continuity, civilianized.

Worthy of thought for anyone involved in BCU operations, especially Safeskys and the individual BCU operators in a similar situation - you would both be equally culpable.
Niknak, I can see where your coming from, bird control was in it's infancy back in 1980 and many lessons were learned.
The BCU could be culpable if proved negligent in his duty. However culpability would more likely be aimed at Airport Managers and Airport Directors as it is these people who write the policies and police their bird control as such.
( I checked with a tame solicitor)

call100
Birds being birds, no one can give a cast iron guarantee of a bird free airport but a well trained, full time BCU can drastically reduce the risk of a major bird strike.
Yep, I'll agree with that.

A bird control unit can't be everywhere at any one time and unless the operator is omnipresent and precisely because of the above, airport authorities are highly likely to go for the option of not having dedicated BCUs.
As call100 said, a dedicated BCU will reduce the risk.

Sadly, it will take a loss of an airliner, to get all Airports,Airlines and the CAA singing from the same hymn book on the subject of BCUs.
Merlin69 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2009, 17:29
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: a galaxy far, far,away...
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interestingly, there is no form of bird control at all in Australia apart from an occasional shotgun fired when the flock gets too big/settled.
aluminium persuader is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2009, 19:41
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
None anywhere???? All that research and money wasted at Sydney then. Nothing at Adelaide?? Perth??
Or are we talking outback only here?
call100 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2009, 10:42
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: a galaxy far, far,away...
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't know anything about research, but no - just a car called out by ATC when the birds get too much. Mostly they just chase them around but sometimes they take a shotgun to them.

ap
aluminium persuader is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2009, 13:07
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slight thread-drift I know, BUT........
Ranger 1,
Why does everyone with a job call themselves a 'co-ordinator' these days?
Who did you co-ordinate with? Do tell.
"Attention all puffins"
"Incoming message for all black-headed gulls, ATR on long final for 23"
I recently had a letter from a 'Human Resources Co-ordinator'
Councils of course are well-known for this muppetry, employing such essentials as "Lesbian Outreach Co-ordinators" and, (most bizzarely), "Street Football Co-ordinators"
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2009, 15:26
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In defence of Ranger1........Your post actually shows your ignorance of the subject being discussed.
I suggest you read CAP680. the Bird Control co-ordinator's function is described in some detail there. It will save anyone typing the long list.
You will find a BCC at all the major airports. It is an actual job title not something he called himself.....
call100 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2009, 15:33
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you mean CAP772 perchance?
(t replaced CAP680 in 2007).
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2009, 16:43
  #35 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Councils of course are well-known for this muppetry, employing such essentials as "Lesbian Outreach Co-ordinators" and, (most bizzarely), "Street Football Co-ordinators"
Ahhh, so Mt. Belzoni sits somewhere close to Manchester....
 
Old 21st Aug 2009, 19:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZOOKER
Do you mean CAP772 perchance?
(t replaced CAP680 in 2007).
Correct, 680 quoted for so long, apologies!! The description is still in there. Chapter two I think.
Were you upset by a co-ordinator of something. Or, have you just got a bee in your bonnet about BCC's?
call100 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2009, 19:58
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interestingly, there is no form of bird control at all in Australia
AP, you should find that's changing (slowly and painfully). At least one major airport now has dedicated bird control staff and another is starting the process.
It's long overdue given the size of ibis, pelicans and other species that frequently use Aussie airports for their own aviation activities, but Management Teams are often hard to convince when it comes to cost/benefit.
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2009, 20:04
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
call100,
yes and no, and no offence meant to Ranger1.
It's just another fine example of 'clackfart' language.
Throw in a 'facilitator', and a 'business-partner' (or two), and you're all set to embed solutions to challenges!
Out of curiosity, what were the other 91 CAP's published between 680 and 772?
Spitoon,
the "Street Football Co-ordinators" are in Moray, north of The Grampians.
Manchester is not, as far as I'm aware, north of The Grampians.
Mt. Belzoni, on the other hand, can be anywhere you want it to be!

Last edited by Jetdriver; 11th Sep 2009 at 03:27.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2009, 20:25
  #39 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well geography never was my strong point.

As for the CAPs.....
681 was Global Fatal Accident Review
682 was Guidance for Approval of Training Organisations
683 was The Assessment of Runway Surface Friction Characteristics
684 was UK Airports Annual Annual Statistics
685...OK, you've got me
686 was Corporate Code of Practice (Helicopters)
687...another one lost in the mists of time
688 was Standards for Clearance Delivery Officers (Ocean)
689 was Progress Report 1998

And now I'm bored. I feel sure my time would be better spent studying my Oxford School Atlas and finding out where these Grampian things are.
 
Old 21st Aug 2009, 22:26
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: a galaxy far, far,away...
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Worrals -
I sincerely hope so, & not a moment too soon.

ap
aluminium persuader is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.